election cannot give a country a firm sense of direction if it has two or more
national parties which merely have different names but are as alike in their
principles and aims as two peas in the same pod.� --Franklin D.
Roosevelt, 32nd US President (1933-45)
�Behind the ostensible government sits
enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no
responsibility to the people.� --Theodore Roosevelt, 26th US
�I don�t remember any time, maybe even
in the Great Depression, when things went down quite so fast, quite so
uniformly around the world.� --Paul Volcker, former U. S. Fed Chairman
�Prosperity is just around the corner.�
--President Herbert Hoover, 1932
�This recession was not caused by a
normal downturn in the business cycle. It was caused by a perfect storm of
irresponsibility and poor decision-making that stretched from Wall Street to
Washington to Main Street.� -- President Barack Obama, April 14, 2009
On April 29,
President Barack Obama completed his first 100 days in office, a symbolic
milestone. In somewhat of a parallel to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who
succeeded the beleaguered administration of Herbert Hoover, Barack Obama took over from a most
clumsy predecessor, George W. Bush.
And, just as for Roosevelt, Obama had a window of
opportunity in his first 100 days in office to initiate new ways of doing
things and new policies. He had all the incentive, mandate and leeway necessary
to distance himself from the previous administration and profoundly change
things for the future.
On the economic front, for example, facing a most urgent
challenge then as now, President Roosevelt immediately embarked upon a
comprehensive program of fundamental reforms and of public works. For instance,
he did not hesitate to close American banks, going as far as to declare a �bank holiday� from March 6, 1933, to March 14, 1933, in order
to reorganize the banking system and to clean up the banks� books. The purpose,
of course, was to renew public confidence in financial institutions and to reestablish the flow of credit
and the level of spending in the economy.
Some 76 years later, it is fair to say that President Barack
Obama was much less determined in dealing with a similar, serious banking
crisis, firstly by reappointing or keeping officials close to the previous Bush
administration and secondly, by prolonging Bush�s policies of subsidizing �too
big-to-fail� and �too big-to-manage� mega-banks with a minimum of conditions,
instead of restructuring them and changing their business model.
This applies to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, American
International Group (AIG), and a host of large international investment banks
(J.P. Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Sun Trust Bank, HSBC
Bank USA, etc.) that have indulged in casino finance rather than
concentrating on channeling stable capital into the economy. In so doing, and
in contrast to what Franklin D. Roosevelt did, Obama did not confront and
reverse the unhealthy and corrupt symbiosis between big
business and big government, which most everybody knows to be the
main cause of the current financial crisis; he prolonged it.
For example, no thorough investigation on the basic causes
of the financial crisis has been launched, and no structural changes in the
financial system have been advanced, above and beyond throwing trillions of
public dollars to camouflage the problem. Consequently, mega-banks can still
rely on casino finance through the derivative market, still package and collateralize
long-term loans into risky short-term financial instruments. Similarly,
gamblers can still buy Credit Default Swaps (CDS), even though they have no
owned securities to protect, while simultaneously engaging in naked short
selling of the stocks of companies, in the hope of depressing the price of
their collateralized debt obligations (CDO). The derivative market is the
greatest grand casino of all, and if left unregulated, it will come again to
haunt the real economy in the future.
Another issue that the new administration failed to tackle is
the practice of vulture or predatory capitalism, where financial operators are
allowed to raid profitable companies and to saddle them with the debt incurred
to take them over. Through such a process, prudently managed companies become
the prey of unscrupulous financial operators who raid them while resorting to
the practice of leveraged finance.
Most amazing of all, maybe, is the lack of concern about the
repeal of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act, and its replacement, in late 1999,
by the pro-banks Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
that, in effect, removed most regulations of risk-taking investment banking. A
similar issue is the lack of concern about the way the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
abandoned its role of protector of the public interest and became a cheerleader
for the mega-banks.
All this leads to the observation that the structural
financial problems of the American banking system have not been aggressively
tackled and corrected, and that future financial crises and their attendant
economic dislocations can be expected. The record will show that President
Obama, in his first 100 days in office, has given the impression of being
co-opted by Wall Street and its laissez-faire ideology, at a time when a clean
break was necessary.
When there are flaws in the policies of a new
administration, the responsibility may not rest with the president alone, but
one must look at his entourage. For better or for worse, President Barack Obama
has surrounded himself with close advisors who are cut from the same cloth: Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff,
David Axelrod, as his senior political adviser, and Lawrence Summers, director
of the National Economic Council and his top economic adviser. Since these
advisors have been known in the past to be opposed to the regulation of exotic
financial instruments, this could explain why President Obama chose someone to
head the strategic Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) who is also
opposed to such regulation, Gary Gensler. Keep in mind that
the CFTC is one of the outfits that regulate the trading in futures contracts
on a host of derivative products that have magnified the subprime mortgage
Sometimes the real influence of close advisors on policies
and decisions can be stronger than that of the president himself, the latter
being busy making speeches, appearing on TV shows and traveling around the
world. The image that comes to mind is the boxer who is taking it on the chin
in the ring, while the backroom managers run the shop. Obviously, President
Obama�s entourage seems to be most influential . . . for better or for worse.
And they have a bias towards Wall Street rather than Main Street.
Rodrigue Tremblay lives in Montreal and can be reached at email@example.com. He is the author of the book ��The New American Empire.� Check out his
new book, �The Code for Global Ethics. Visit his blog site at thenewamericanempire.com/blog.