It�s been 21 months since two Bear Stearns hedge funds
defaulted setting off a series of events which have led to the gravest economic
crisis since the Great Depression.
No one expected the financial meltdown to hit this hard or
spread this fast. The failure at Bear triggered a freeze in the secondary
market where mortgage loans are repackaged into securities and sold to
investors. That market is now completely paralyzed cutting off 40 percent of
funding for consumer and business loans and thrusting the broader economy into
a deep recession. Banks and financial institutions have been forced to curtail
their off-balance sheet operations and build their reserves which have ballooned
from $45 billion to nearly $700 billion in the last six months alone. Like
millions of homeowners who have seen their home equity vanish and their
retirement savings slashed in half, the banks are hunkering down hoping they
can outlast the deflationary hurricane ahead.
The deteriorating economic conditions have taken their toll
on consumer confidence and forced businesses to lay off employees that won�t be
needed during the slowdown. The system is bursting with overcapacity. Demand is
falling faster than any time since the 1930s. Inventories will have to be
trimmed and budgets cut to muddle through the downtimes. Foreign trade has
slowed to a crawl, auto sales are down by 40 percent or more, and unemployment
is rising at 650,000 per month. Policymakers have pushed through a $800 billion
stimulus plan, but it won�t be nearly enough to stop the steady rise in
unemployment or take up the slack in an economy where industrial output has
been cut in half, new home construction has dropped to record lows, and
manufacturing has fallen off a cliff. Economists warn that when governments don�t
step in and provide stimulus to increase aggregate demand, consumers cut back
sharply on spending and push the economy deeper into depression.
Treasury Secretary Geithner and Fed chief Bernanke have lent
or committed $13 trillion trying to keep the financial system functioning, but
they�ve only managed to plug a few holes and avoid a system-wide collapse. The
financial system is hobbled and unable to provide sufficient credit to generate
growth. Every sector has suffered cutbacks, layoffs and slimmer profits. The
problems go beyond toxic assets or complex derivatives. The system is plagued
with stagnation, overcapacity and redundancy.
Economics professor Robert Brenner sums it up like this in
an interview in the Asia Pacific Journal: �The current crisis is more serious
than the worst previous recession of the postwar period, between 1979 and 1982,
and could conceivably come to rival the Great Depression, though there is no
way of really knowing. Economic forecasters have underestimated how bad it is
because they have over-estimated the strength of the real economy and failed to
take into account the extent of its dependence upon a buildup of debt that
relied on asset price bubbles. In the U.S., during the recent business cycle of
the years 2001-2007, GDP growth was by far the slowest of the postwar epoch.
There was no increase in private sector employment. The increase in plants and
equipment was about a third of the previous, a postwar low. Real wages were
basically flat. There was no increase in median family income for the first
time since World War II. Economic growth was driven entirely by personal
consumption and residential investment, made possible by easy credit and rising
house prices. Economic performance was weak, even despite the enormous stimulus
from the housing bubble and the Bush administration�s huge federal deficits.
Housing by itself accounted for almost one-third of the growth of GDP and close
to half of the increase in employment in the years 2001-2005. It was,
therefore, to be expected that when the housing bubble burst, consumption and
residential investment would fall, and the economy would plunge. � (�Overproduction
not Financial Collapse is the Heart of the Crisis,� Robert P. Brenner speaks
with Jeong Seong-jin, Asia Pacific Journal)
The economy is now in a downward spiral. Tightening in the
credit markets has made it harder for consumers to borrow or businesses to
expand. Overextended financial institutions are forced to shed assets at fire sale
prices to meet margin calls from the banks. Asset deflation is ongoing with no
end in sight. Price declines in housing have reached 30 percent already and are
now accelerating on the downside. This is the nightmare scenario that Bernanke
hoped to avoid; a capitulation in real estate that drags the rest of economy
into a black hole.
Economist Nouriel Roubini and market analyst Meredith
Whitney predict that housing prices will drop another 20 percent before they
hit bottom. Nearly half of all homeowners will be underwater and owe more on
their mortgages than the current value of their homes. That will increase the
foreclosures and push scores of banks into default.
According to Merrill Lynch�s economist David Rosenberg, �It
would take over three years to achieve price stability (in housing) The problem
is that prices do not begin to stabilize until we break below eight months�
supply -- and they tend to deflate 3% per quarter until that happens. So as
impressive as it is that the builders have taken single-family starts below
underlying sales, their efforts are just not sufficient to prevent real estate
prices from falling further. In fact, even if the builders were to declare a
moratorium immediately, that is, taking starts to zero, demand is so weak and
the unsold inventory so intractable that it would now take over three years to
achieve the holy grail of price stability in the residential real estate
market.�
The main economic indicators all point to a long period of
retrenchment ahead. The slowdown in global trade has hit Germany, Japan, and
most of Asia particularly hard. The export-driven model of growth has suffered
a major setback and won�t rebound for some time to come. With the US consumer
unable to continue his debt-fueled spending spree, surplus countries will have
to develop domestic markets for growth, but it won�t be easy. Chinese workers
save 50 percent of what they earn and German workers already have a comfortable
life without increasing personal consumption. Higher wages and lower interest
rates can help stimulate demand, but cultural influences make it difficult to
change spending habits. Meanwhile, the economy will continue to languish,
operating well below its optimum capacity.
Capital flows have also suddenly reversed causing turmoil in
the currency markets. January�s TIC data indicates that net capital outflows
for the US were negative $148 billion in January. Capital is now fleeing the
country. Financial protectionism has triggered the repatriation of foreign
investment causing a sharp drop in the purchase of US sovereign debt.
This is from Brad Setser, economist for the CFR: �The
obvious implication of the recent downturn in total reserve holdings -- and the
$180 billion fall in q4 wasn�t driven by currency moves -- is that the pace of
growth in the world�s dollar reserves has slowed dramatically . . .
�The obvious implication: most of the 2009 US fiscal deficit
WILL NEED TO BE FINANCED DOMESTICALLY. The Fed�s custodial data indicates central
banks are still buying Treasuries, though at a somewhat slower pace than in
late 2008. But their demand hasn�t kept up with issuance. (Foreign Central
banks aren�t going to finance much of the 2009 US fiscal deficit; Their
reserves aren�t growing anymore,� Brad Setser, Council on Foreign Relations)
The United States does not have the reserves to finance its
own massive deficits which will soar to $1.9 trillion by the end of 2009. The
Fed will have to increase its purchases of US Treasuries and monetize the debt.
Foreign holders of Treasuries and dollar-backed assets ($5 trillion overseas)
will be watching carefully as Bernanke revs up the printing presses to fight
the recession and meet government obligations. China, Russia, Venezuela and
Iran have already called for a change in the world�s reserve currency. It won�t
happen overnight, but the momentum is steadily growing.
The S&P 500 has soared 23 percent in the last four
weeks, but the current market rally is misleading. The prospects for a quick
recovery are remote at best. The fundamentals are all weak. Corporate profits
are down, GDP is negative 6 percent, housing is in a shambles, and the banking
system broken. The Fed has increased the money supply by 22 percent, but
economic activity is at a standstill. The velocity at which money is spent is
the slowest since 1987. Nothing is moving. The banks are hoarding, credit has
dried up, and consumers are saving for the first time in two decades. The banks�
credit-conduit cannot function properly until bad assets are removed from their
balance sheets. But the magnitude of the losses make it impossible for the
government to purchase them outright without bankrupting the country.
According to the Times Online, the IMF has increased its
estimates of how much toxic mortgage-backed paper the banks are holding: �Toxic
debts racked up by banks and insurers could spiral to $4 trillion, new
forecasts from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are set to suggest.
�The IMF said in January that it expected the deterioration
in US-originated assets to reach $2.2 trillion by the end of next year, but it
is understood to be looking at raising that to $3.1 trillion in its next
assessment of the global economy, due to be published on April 21. In addition,
it is likely to boost that total by $900 billion for toxic assets originated in
Europe and Asia.
�Banks and insurers, which so far have owned up to $1.29
trillion in toxic assets, are facing increasing losses as the deepening
recession takes a toll, adding to the debts racked up from sub-prime mortgages.
The IMF�s new forecast, which could be revised again before the end of the
month, will come as a blow to governments that have already pumped billions
into the banking system.�
Since banks lend at a ratio of 10 to 1; the amount of credit
cut off to the broader economy will ensure that sluggish growth well into the
future. If there is a recovery, it will be weak. The Obama administration will
have to increase its capital injections even though they will add to
mushrooming deficits. So far, financial institutions have only written down $1
trillion or 25 percent of their losses. This means the banking system is
insolvent. Eventually, Obama will have to resolve the bad banks and auction off
troubled assets, even though political support is rapidly eroding.
According to political analyst F. William Engdahl, most of
the garbage assets are concentrated in the nation�s five biggest banks: �Today
five US banks according to data in the just-released Federal Office of
Comptroller of the Currency�s Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives
Activity, hold 96% of all US bank derivatives positions in terms of nominal
values, and an eye-popping 81% of the total net credit risk exposure in event
of default.
�The five are, in declining order of importance: JPMorgan
Chase which holds a staggering $88 trillion in derivatives (�66 trillion!).
Morgan Chase is followed by Bank of America with $38 trillion in derivatives,
and Citibank with $32 trillion. Number four in the derivatives sweepstakes is
Goldman Sachs with a �mere� $30 trillion in derivatives. Number five, the
merged Wells Fargo-Wachovia Bank, drops dramatically in size to $5 trillion.
Number six, Britain�s HSBC Bank USA has $3.7 trillion. (�Geithner�s
�Dirty Little Secret, �F. William Engdahl, Online Journal)
These five banking Goliaths are at the center of political
power in America today. Their White House emissary, Timothy Geithner, has
concocted a rescue plan -- the Public-Private Investment Program -- which will
provide 94 percent funding from the FDIC for the purchase bad assets. The
program is designed to keep asset prices artificially high while transferring
the bulk of the losses to the taxpayer.
The plan has been widely criticized and has raised a few
eyebrows even among usually supportive members of the establishment, like the
Financial Times: �US banks that have received government aid, including
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan Chase, are considering
buying toxic assets to be sold by rivals under the Treasury�s $1,000bn (�680bn)
plan to revive the financial system.
�The plans proved controversial, with critics charging that
the government�s public-private partnership -- which provide generous loans to
investors -- are intended to help banks sell, rather than acquire, troubled
securities and loans.
�Banks have three options if they want to buy toxic assets:
apply to become one of four or five fund managers that will purchase troubled
securities; bid for packages of bad loans; or buy into funds set up by others.
The government plan does not allow banks to buy their own assets, but there is
no ban on the purchase of securities and loans sold by others.� (The Financial
Times)
It�s a multi-billion dollar shell game with myriad
opportunities for fraud. In theory, the banks could create their own
off-balance sheet operations (SIVs or SPEs) and use them to purchase their own
bad assets, taking advantage of the government�s 94 percent low interest
nonrecourse loans. It�s a blatant swindle and another windfall for Wall Street.
Geithner�s plan does not fix the problems with the banks, it
only delays the final outcome. The next leg-down in the recession will push
many of the undercapitalized banks into receivership. Geithner�s PPIP won�t
change that. As housing prices fall and foreclosures rise, the capital position
of many of the banks will become untenable, leading to a rash of bank failures.
An article in last Monday�s Wall Street Journal puts adds
some historical perspective to today�s financial crisis: �The events of the
past 10 years have an eerie similarity to the period leading up to the Great
Depression. Total mortgage debt outstanding increased from $9.35 billion in
1920 to $29.44 billion in 1929. In 1920, residential mortgage debt was 10.2% of
household wealth; by 1929, it was 27.2% of household wealth. . . .
�The causes of the Great Depression need more study, but the
claims that losses on stock-market speculation and a monetary contraction
caused the decline of the banking system both seem inadequate. It appears that
both the Great Depression and the current crisis had their origins in excessive
consumer debt -- especially mortgage debt -- that was transmitted into the
financial sector during a sharp downturn.
�Why does one crash cause minimal damage to the financial
system, so that the economy can pick itself up quickly, while another crash
leaves a devastated financial sector in the wreckage? The hypothesis we propose
is that a financial crisis that originates in consumer debt, especially
consumer debt concentrated at the low end of the wealth and income
distribution, can be transmitted quickly and forcefully into the financial
system. It appears that we�re witnessing the second great consumer debt crash,
the end of a massive consumption binge.� (�From Bubble to Depression?� Steven
Gjerstad and Vernon L. Smith, Wall Street Journal)
Party like its 1929
Two leading economic historians, Barry Eichengreen and Kevin
H. Rourke, have written an article. �A Tale of Two Depressions,�
which has been widely circulated on the Internet. It illustrates (with graphs)
how the global economy is plummeting faster now than during the 1930s.
By nearly every objective standard, the present downturn is worse
than the Great Depression. Manufacturing, industrial production, foreign trade,
capital flows, consumer confidence, housing, and even stocks are falling faster
today than after the crash of 1929. So far, Bernanke�s monetary Band Aids have
prevented the wholesale collapse of the financial system, but that could
change. The economy continues its downhill slide and it looks like there�s
nothing to stop it from falling further still.
Mike
Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.