Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 Satire
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

The Lighter Side Last Updated: Feb 24th, 2010 - 01:02:11


Bulletin from the Institute of Future History: ExxonMobil and Citigroup to run for president
By Alan James Strachan, Ph.D.
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Feb 24, 2010, 00:28

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

March 28, 2012 -- In the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision that corporations can run for President, Exxon Mobil and Citigroup announced their candidacy.

In a series of rulings over the past 120 years, the Supreme Court has determined that corporations are, in fact, human beings, and it has gradually expanded their rights as US citizens.

In the court�s most recent ruling, the unanimous decision decreed, �As human beings and citizens of the US, any corporation has the right to run for political office. Corporations, like each and every citizen, have the inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Can anyone deny how happy they will be to be able to hold political office?�

The ACLU accused the court of succumbing to intense corporate lobbying. Chief Justice Roberts, located at a Citigroup-owned resort in Majorca, declined comment.

A court spokesperson stated that the unanimous decision was completely unrelated to corporate sponsorship of the court. Last year, when the US government was unable to provide a budget, the Supreme Court was forced to turn to corporate sponsors. Responding to public complaints that corporate logos on the justice�s robes lack dignity, a spokesperson stated that they were �tasteful� and �in no way affected the impartiality of the court.�

Citigroup was selected by a secret meeting of the Banker�s Party, formerly the Democratic Party, while Exxon Mobil was chosen in a similar fashion by the Oil and Gas Party, formerly the Republican Party. When asked why the decisions were made behind closed doors, rather than in an open convention, each party declined comment.

After announcing their candidacy at a joint press conference, Citigroup and Exxon Mobil issued the following statement:

We are proud to announce a new era of cooperation in the selection of a president. We will not be running a negative campaign. In fact, we will not be running a campaign at all. The mere fact that we are now able to run for office amply demonstrates our ability to get things done. Voters seeking further information are referred to our annual reports. Finally, we want to assure the voters that whichever candidate they vote for, they will receive exactly the same representation.

In related news, stock prices for Citigroup and Exxon Mobil soared to unprecedented highs.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

The Lighter Side
Latest Headlines
Why it takes so many Mossad agents to kill a Palestinian with a pillow
Bulletin from the Institute of Future History: ExxonMobil and Citigroup to run for president
The State of the Corporate Union
My country �tis of thee -- Corporatocracy! Of thee I sing
New loan promises to save USA, global capital
Mocha Revolution in New York!
Bulletins from Konsciousness Kontrol
The real criminals
Just say no (to medical marijuana in NH): An open letter to Gov. Lynch
What to do with 1,200 pounds of bull and other handy lessons from Women�s History
The beeper cacophony
Skoda: Car of the ordinary citizen
Christian settlers expel Jews from Holy Land
Nation rearing the old fashion way
The holiday formerly known as Thanksgiving
What�s in a middle name?
Sarah Palin wins debate -- by darn
Meditation upon a broomstick (an allusion to Jonathan Swift)
Something you might not know about John McCain
The rocket�s red glare may be Chinese