Oil
prices have surpassed a record US $95 a barrel. Given the growing geopolitical
tensions in the Middle East involving an imminent war between the Turks and the
Kurds over the future of oil-rich Kirkuk and the prospect of an independent
Kurdish state, and the current standoff about Iran�s nuclear program, petroleum
prices may cross over $100 a barrel in coming days.
Despite
the indispensable role of the West, the United States in particular, in
creating and escalating diverse tensions in the Middle East and the
oil-suppliers of the Persian Gulf region, it is ironically the West itself
which will be forced to suffer for the fuel price hike and the consequences of
high-priced energy on the world economy.
Oil
functions as the lifeblood of the global economy and any increase in petroleum
prices causes serious effects and, in some cases, devastating pain on the economies
in both developed and developing countries. Cheap oil has long been an
important engine of rapid economic growth and development in the West and the
East.
For
instance, it was more than one and half decades ago when the American
economist, Alan Freeman, pointed out that each $1 drop in the price of a barrel
of petroleum transfers roughly $5 billion a year from Third World countries to
North America, and the difference between oil at $20 and oil at $25 a barrel
means the transfer of $70 to $100 billion from the poor and impoverished South
to the rich and prosperous North. Considering the sharp rise in global oil
consumption over the past decade, today these figures are no doubt even more
astounding.
Regarding
the new surge in petroleum prices, the West�s quandary over Iran�s nuclear
issue is of paramount importance. For Iran, the nuclear program is simply a
matter of national security aiming to counterbalance the country�s chronic
energy shortage in the not too distant future. Any American uncalculated harsh
policy and irrational behavior in bombing the country would obviously force the
Iranians into defensive and retaliatory measures, ranging from the closure of
the world�s oil throat, the Strait of Hormuz, to attacking oil tankers and
possibly targeting major oil fields in the southern part of the Persian Gulf.
Such a worse case scenario might cost the health of all oil-importing economies
dearly.
The
whole point about invading and occupying Iraq by the United States was about
oil, the hidden and unspoken fact behind the West�s fuss over Iran�s nuclear
program is also related to the issue of oil in one way to another.
What
the West prefers is a weak and defenseless Iran, vulnerable to being bullied
and conquered, such as what happened to Iraq in 2003. The West fears that an
Iran equipped with nuclear technology may dash its hopes in classifying the
country as another �Cakewalk� in Western geostrategic calculations and grand
strategies.
Because
of its location at the juncture of energy-rich Central Asia and the Persian
Gulf with domination over the Strait of Hormuz, where the majority of tankers
carrying Middle East oil pass through, Iran enjoys a very strategic location in
the world. It is also a main obsession in all considerations of great powers
with interests in the region. This makes sense why hardly any day passes
without Iran being in the headlines.
Oil
was first discovered in Iran in May 1908 and then in Iraq shortly after World
War I. Three decades after Iran, in 1938 oil was also discovered in Saudi
Arabia, the present largest petroleum producing country. Iran� current crude
oil reserves are estimated at 137 billion barrels, or 11.6 percent of the
world�s total reserves. At the same time, Iran has 29,000 billion cubic meters
of natural gas, or 15.3 percent of total global reserves.
While
oil prices are moving for higher, we have a couple of months left before Iran
prepares to celebrate the 100th anniversary of its oil discovery. The
continuation of current circumstances in the region only makes it predictable
for the Iranians to have the epoch-making event of the oil discovery celebrated
with $100 petroleum.
Where
it comes to the Persian Gulf region, a quick glance at history reveals that oil
prices are affected before key political developments. The longer the stalemate
over Iran�s nuclear issue, the higher petroleum prices, and this, undoubtedly,
is not good news for oil-thirsty economies. Hard policies or even a military
option to settle the crisis will only make things worse and could make U.S.
President George W. Bush�s prophecy about World War III come true.
Shirzad
Azad is an East-West Asian Relations researcher at the Graduate School of
International Politics, Economics and Communication, Aoyama Gakuin University,
Tokyo.