The last time I spoke publicly in the United States before
my current tour was nearly four years ago. During this time I had travelled the
world, passing my message to people in nearly 20 countries. Wherever I went, my
calls for justice for the Palestinian people and for global alternatives to
racism and war were well received. However, my latest talks in the US have made
me realize that the witch-hunt on intellectuals that escalated rapidly since
September 11, 2001, is nowhere near over.
Doubtless, the US has long served as a focal site for
intellectual freedom, from which ground-breaking ideas have developed and
spread throughout the world. And despite incessant attempts to circumvent this
historic reality, most Americans still remain committed to their country's
founding principles. It is this commitment that causes those interested in
stifling undesirable viewpoints to resort to the most disingenuous tactics,
half-truths and downright fabrication.
Norfolk, Virginia, was the first leg of the tour for my
latest book, The Second Palestinian Intifada. Co-existing with the town's 14
military bases is an energetic and hugely inspiring antiwar community. To now
be able to stand among and share my views on peace and justice with these
activists was a truly heartening experience for me.
At Virginia Wesleyan College, I spoke about a myriad of
topics, including Palestine, Iraq, Venezuela, Nicaragua. I tend towards a
cross-cultural perspective to help my audience assess their relationship to
issues beyond geopolitical limitations, national arrogance and
ethnocentricities.
On Palestine, I preached co-existence without prescribing
any easy recipes. Instead I outlined basic prerequisites. To achieve
co-existence, justice is a must, and to achieve justice, Israel needs to
acknowledge its historic injustices against the Palestinian people and make a
commitment to redressing them. Palestine cannot be single handedly expected to
extract peace from a belligerent Israeli government that has done its utmost to
undermine it.
I discussed suicide bombings in a context usually missing
from mainstream discourse, trying to delineate that such heinous acts are not a
lifestyle choice. One must be courageous enough to examine the roots of
violence in order to eliminate it; for Palestinian violence to end, the much
more costly, systematic and state-initiated Israeli violence and illegal
occupation must also stop. Palestinian suffering cannot be expected to
magically vanish for the sake of Israel's security. To base one nation's
security on deprivation of another is nothing short of illegal, irrational, and
inhumane.
In my talk, I praised Palestinians for their courage in
living up to the diktats of democracy, and chastised those who ensured the
demise of the once promising Palestinian democratic experience, which could
have served as a model for democracies in the entire region. Palestinians
should not be starved and a civil war should not have been provoked to punish
the Palestinian people for electing a government that insists on the respect of
their people's rights. I contested that Hamas' Islamic ideas were hardly the
reason behind the US-Israeli violent response to their advent, and that
'extremism' and 'moderation' are not defined based on liberal ideals, but are
used to distinguish between those who are willing to serve as client regimes
and those who opt otherwise. I tried to imagine a future in which Palestinians
and Israelis can work together to escape the dark abyss brought about by the
Israeli and US governments, stressing that such a future cannot be guaranteed
with the hollow lip service to 'peace'; it requires real justice and equality.
Apparently my words did not move local Rabbi Israel Zoberman
and his comrades. They attended the talk after a local Jewish newspaper
highlighted the upcoming event on their front page: a 'Pro Palestinian'
Journalist to Speak at Virginia Wesleyan. They came armed and ready to attack
my integrity before even hearing me speak. One after the other, they hijacked
the questions; one alleged that in 1880 there were more Jews than Christians
and Muslims in Palestine. How does one respond to such a falsehood? Another
claimed that Israel has never ethnically cleansed one Palestinian. Not one? A
third claimed that by trying to contextualize suicide bombings, no matter how
well my intentions may be, I am justifying the horrific terrorism of 9/11. This
accusation was by far the most devious. Zoberman himself accused me of being a
'Hamas sympathizer,' and since Hamas is on the US State Department list of
terrorist groups, well, you can do the math.
Infuriated by the fact that I refused compromise at a
following event, Zoberman began a campaign of letter-writing and phoning the
university and a local newspaper, describing my message as 'poisonous.' He also
chastised the college for hosting my talk and demanded a change of course. The
campaign of defamation is yet to end.
Although this is not my first experience of such unfair and
dishonest smearing, the last few years have witnessed an increase in the
Zionist attempts to curb free debate on the Middle East in this country, from
such respected figures and intellectuals as Jimmy Carter and Desmond Tutu, Norman
Finkelstein, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. In short, anyone who dares
question the US government's Middle East policy or even recognize the rights of
the Palestinian people is a candidate for senseless attacks and (often) of
accusations of anti-Semitism. Fortunately this time, I was spared the latter.
The truth is, the greater the intimidation campaign, the
more determined many US intellectuals become in exposing the destructive role
that Israel has played in shaping US foreign policy. What Zionists in the US
wish to overlook is the fact that some of the most ardent supporters of
Palestinian rights are themselves Jewish, and that is simply because the
question of justice and peace is not hostage to ethnic or religious identities.
That intimidation may break the will of the weak, but the human spirit is too
strong to be shattered by smearing and arm-twisting. The truth will always
manage to find its way out to the people; in fact, in many respects, it already
has.
Ramzy
Baroud is a Palestinian-American author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has
been published in numerous newspapers and journals worldwide, including the
Washington Post, Japan Times, Al Ahram Weekly and Lemonde Diplomatique. His
latest book is The
Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People�s
Struggle (Pluto Press, London). Read more about him on his website: ramzybaroud.net.