Online Journal
Front Page 
 Special Reports
 News Media
 Elections & Voting
 Social Security
 Editors' Blog
 Reclaiming America
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 The Lighter Side
 The Mailbag
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Join Mailing List

News Media Last Updated: Mar 26th, 2010 - 00:51:41

The F Word: The New York Times� bias killed ACORN
By Laura Flanders
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Mar 26, 2010, 00:20

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

So, the New York Times finally ran a correction. But after six weeks of �considering� the errors in its own reporting, the so-called paper of record�s correction of its misleading ACORN story, came way, way, WAY too late.

The Times� correction ran the same day that the anti-poverty group ACORN called it quits, after a year under attack -- and a day after the paper�s public editor wrote that yes indeed, the paper has �mistakenly reinforced falsehoods� from right-wing activists against the group.

When activists released videos appearing to show ACORN workers offering advice to people posing as a pimp and a prostitute, the Times fell for an editing trick. The videos gave the impression that two activists were dressed in outlandish costumes when they visited ACORN offices. They weren�t. Video transcripts also contradicted what the video makers claimed, namely that ACORN staffers appeared to endorse talk of using underage girls as prostitutes.

In fact, the transcript reveals that ACORN staffers believed they were discussing a plan to protect two girls. The Times also fell for that.

Responding to a complaint from the media critics at Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, Hoyt said Sunday that the paper�s editors were �considering issuing a correction.�

They�d had six weeks (since the transcript was first brought to their attention) for that. �Considering.� Synonyms include chewing over, cogitating, contemplating. Just what were they contemplating?

What Times readers might want to consider is New York Times prejudice. If Hoyt and his friends had been taken for a ride by the Yes Men, say, who regularly pose as captains of industry saying outrageous (or not so outrageous) things -- would the paper have cogitated over a correction for weeks?

Activists with the group Code Pink pulled off a hoax Tuesday by releasing a fake press release in AIPAC�s name calling for a complete freeze on Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories. Think the Times would have fallen so unquestioningly for that?

Here�s something to consider. The paper fact-checks allegations from left leaning groups -- to death. The contemplation-of-a-correction story is less about bad reporting than bias. The Times seems to have considered ACORN guilty from the start.

In ACORN�s case, the patient�s dead. But that doesn�t mean the doctor shouldn�t be struck off.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at and Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

News Media
Latest Headlines
Where�s Ed Newman when you need him?
Press TV under attack
Afghanistan in the picture, but not in the flesh
Reporting on the reporting
The mainstream media mind warp
The buffoonization of Hugo Chavez
Helen Thomas, James Taranto, the WSJ editorial page, and me
Thanks, Helen, for telling it like it is!
Michigan senator introduces bill to register journalists
The Internet is a game changer - a paperless world
Chevron's �crude� attempt to suppress free speech
Reporters Without Borders seems to have a geopolitical agenda
The south reduced: How the news media promotes a mistaken view of the world
Turkey�s henchmen: Mass media butcher the Armenian genocide
The F Word: The New York Times� bias killed ACORN
The Washington Post on �lunatic� 9/11 �conspiracy theorists�
The Dispatch goes for the re-kill of Arthur Shapiro
It�s snow news
Iran and Latin America: The media states its case