Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Feb 4th, 2010 - 00:38:28


The defense industry is pleased with Obama
By Laura Flanders
Online Journal Guest Writer


Feb 4, 2010, 00:22

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Who says the president is failing to show leadership? In one area at least, there�s no sign of flag or falter. If anything, the administration�s only becoming more forthright. Sad to say, that area is military build-up.

Last year, the White House made a big deal of cutting a weapons program -- the F-22 fighter jet -- and the cuts conveniently obscured the growth in spending on unmanned aircraft or drones (the weapons that Pakistanis say killed a record 123 civilians in 12 attacks last month; 41 for every alleged Al Qaeda member.)

This year, the president dispensed with window dressing. No big deal about cuts -- except on the domestic side. While the administration�s record $3.8 trillion budget shrinks or freezes spending on domestic needs, it requests $708.3 billion for war. That�s $14.8 billion more than we�re spending now.

The total includes $548.9 billion for �regular� war, plus $159.3 billion for special spending on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Oh yes, the administration�s also asking Congress to increase spending on new nuclear weapons by more than $7 billion dollars over the next five years -- despite that peace prize-winning pledge to cut the US arsenal and seek a nuclear weapons-free world.

The quote of the day comes from the CEO of a military contractor-funded policy group called the Lexington Institute. Loren Thompson tells Tuesday�s New York Times, �The defense industry is pleased but bemused . . . It�s been telling itself for years that when the Democrats got control it would be bad news for weapons programs. But the spending keeps going on.�

Take that you Nobel committee!

And to think some whiners complain about Democrats suffering from a lack of direction.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Obama seeks $200 million fund for Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial security
Gulf anti-missile shield
The defense industry is pleased with Obama
Capitalist tool
Decency and strength
What do Iraqis want?
Blair has slithered off the hook again
So now what?
Supreme Court-porate opinion blesses corruporate campaign financing
Hijinks or undercover ops?
What�s quaking, what�s shaking?
Last rites for America�s near-death democracy
Obama�s 2011 budget
American anomalies: Just how insane is our foreign policy?
A life well lived: Remembering Howard Zinn, people�s historian
Will Obama guarantee a new reactor war?
Is it failing schools or failing communities?
What is the purpose of the London Conference on Afghanistan?
What Is it you said, Mr. President?
It�s not a new Turkey; it�s the right time