Online Journal
Front Page 
 Special Reports
 News Media
 Elections & Voting
 Social Security
 Editors' Blog
 Reclaiming America
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 The Lighter Side
 The Mailbag
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Join Mailing List

Analysis Last Updated: Jan 12th, 2009 - 01:48:03

US Senate endorses Israel�s war on Gaza
By Jeremy R. Hammond
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Jan 12, 2009, 00:23

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The US Senate last Thursday passed a non-binding resolution promoted by the influential Israeli lobby AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee), effectively endorsing Israel�s war on Gaza.

The resolution, entitled �A resolution expressing solidarity with Israel in Israel�s defense against terrorism in the Gaza Strip� recognizes �the right of Israel to defend itself against attacks from Gaza� and reaffirms �the United States� strong support for Israel in its battle with Hamas.�

The resolution does not recognize the right to self-defense of the Palestinian people.

The resolution criticizes Hamas for refusing �to comply with the requirements of the Quartet,� which include to �recognize Israel�s right to exist� and to �renounce violence.�

It makes no mention of Israel�s continuing settlement expansion in the West Bank, also in violation of the Quartet requirements. Nor does it call upon Israel, which illegally occupies the West Bank and has held Gaza under siege for three years, to recognize the �right to exist� of a Palestinian state or to renounce violence.

The resolution condemns the use of �human shields� by Hamas, but says nothing of the indiscriminate killing by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) that is taking a devastating toll upon civilians in Gaza.

The resolution, quoting from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, blames Hamas �for breaking the ceasefire and for the renewal of violence there.�

It makes no mention of the fact that Hamas had strictly observed the cease-fire until it was violated by Israel on November 4, when Israel launched an air strike into Gaza that killed five and injured several others.

The resolution notes that �the humanitarian situation in Gaza, including shortages of food, water, electricity, and adequate medical care, is becoming more acute.�

It neglects to point out that this is the direct result of Israel�s policy of blockading Gaza, and that the humanitarian crisis has been greatly exacerbated by Israel�s aerial bombardment and invasion of Gaza, instead praising the minimal amount of humanitarian aid Israel has allowed into the territory.

The resolution also states that �a sustainable resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that will allow for a viable and independent Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with the State of Israel . . . will not be possible as long as Israeli civilians are under threat from within Gaza.�

It says nothing about the impossibility of such a two-state solution so long as Palestinians live under occupation and threat from Israel.

Members of Congress voice support for Israel

Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) voiced her support for the resolution by saying that Israel�s war on Gaza was �a phase in a war against Iranian terror.� She said she looked forward to being able to visit Israel when its citizens were no longer under threat, presumably from rockets fired from Gaza.

She said nothing about wanting to visit Gaza or looking forward to its citizens living no longer under threat from Israel.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) characterized Israel�s war as �self-defense� and said it was well within its rights to engage in such action. He said he supported a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but added that such a solution would only be tenable if Israel is �secure.� He added that �Israel can always look to the United States for support and that this will continue to be true when Barack Obama becomes president.�

He said nothing about the security of any future Palestinian state, or of the security of the territories at present that are illegally occupied by Israel. He offered no suggestions as to whom the Palestinian people could look to for support.

Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-NV) expressed having �every confidence that the incoming administration would continue the unwavering support of the United States of America for the state of Israel.� She said her own opinion, �as a Jewish member of Congress� is that Israel has �every right to defend itself� and that Israelis �have been too patient� in responding to rocket attacks from Gaza. She expressed that it was unacceptable for tunnels to be used to smuggle weapons into Gaza.

She failed to note that it was Israel, not Hamas, which first violated the cease-fire. She expressed no similar empathy for the Palestinian people, who have lived under oppression and terror on a much greater scale, and who have been killed in far higher numbers by Israeli military actions. She made no mention of the fact that tunnels are also used to avert a complete humanitarian catastrophe, to bring in food, fuel, medical supplies, and other humanitarian goods because Israel�s blockade has prevented such basic necessities from being delivered into Gaza.

Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) condemned Hamas� firing of rockets into Israel because they were intended to kill civilians even though only a small number had been killed. He said the US looks forward to �supporting Israel through its difficult time now.�

He did not condemn the Israeli killing of hundreds of Palestinian civilians or express any sympathy for the difficult time the Palestinians are going through.

Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NV) said, �If you don�t want to be hit back, don�t hit. That�s really the message� of Israel�s war on Gaza. He blamed criticism of Israel on �anti-Semitism� and called it �blaming the victim.� He said �Israel has that right, to protect itself.�

He neglected to mention that it was Israel, not Hamas, which broke the cease-fire. Nor did he offer any indication that this standard applied equally to both Israelis and Palestinians. He expressed no support for the right of Palestinians to protect themselves.

Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA) expressed that weapons should not be made available to Hamas.

He offered no similar comments about weapons being made available to Israel.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) was a lone voice in the Congress expressing any kind of empathy for the plight of the Palestinians. In remarks from the floor of the House, he said:

�Wake up America. We have trillions for a war machine and the banks while our government stands by and sniffs at the slaughter of innocents in Gaza, where Israel is blocking aid for wounded Palestinians. Here�s today�s Washington Post. It says, �The International Committee of the Red Cross said Thursday that it found at least 15 bodies and several children emaciated but alive in a row of shattered houses in the Gaza Strip and accused the Israeli military of preventing ambulances from reaching the site for four days. Twelve corpses lying on mattresses in one home, along with four young children lying next to their dead mothers.� That�s a quote. Today, US tax dollars, US jets, and US helicopters provided to Israel are enabling the slaughter in Gaza. The administration enables Israel to press forward with the attack against defenseless civilians, blocks efforts at promoting a cease-fire at the UN, and refuses to make Israel compliant with conditions that arms shipments will not be used for aggression. Israel is going to receive $30 billion in a 10-year period for military assistance, without having to abide by any humanitarian principles, international laws, or standards of basic human decency. Wake up America.�

Jeremy R. Hammond is the editor of Foreign Policy Journal, a website dedicated to providing news, critical analysis, and opinion commentary on U.S. foreign policy from outside of the standard framework offered by government officials and the mainstream corporate media, particularly with regard to the �war on terrorism� and events in the Middle East. He has also written for numerous other online publications. You can contact him at

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
The collapsing US economy: Will the government turn to the printing press?
US Senate endorses Israel�s war on Gaza
Gaza catastrophe: Resource conflict?
Somber thought for the New Year: Will there be a recovery?
Gaza in perspective
UN Resolution 1850 is Bush�s farewell gift
A most desperate move by the Fed
London Banker: �The market has failed, and officialdom is perpetuating that failure�
Greece�s riots reveal the signs of a society in the throes of decomposition
Federal Reserve sets stage for Weimar-style hyperinflation
US/Canadian political impasse: The patient is dead
Understanding the goals of Zionism�s right-wing Revisionists
Whose interests will shape Barack Obama�s �change�?
Heed Russia�s warnings about further NATO expansion
Iraq�s US security charade
Igniting a new cold war: The cost of U.S. hegemony is beyond reach
Maliki and Bush: Conflicting priorities
A peace process that makes peace impossible
Obama�s foreign crises
The truth behind the Citigroup nationalization