The dramatic military attack by the military of the Republic
of Georgia on South Ossetia in the last days has brought the world one major
step closer to the ultimate horror of the Cold War era -- a thermonuclear war
between Russia and the United States -- by miscalculation.
What is playing out in the Caucasus is being reported in US
media in an alarmingly misleading light, making Moscow appear the lone
aggressor. The question is whether George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are
encouraging the unstable Georgian President, Mikhail Saakashvili in order to
force the next US president to back the NATO military agenda of the Bush
Doctrine. Washington may have badly misjudged the possibilities, as it did in
Iraq, but this time with possible nuclear consequences.
The underlying issue, as I stressed in my July 11 article, Georgia, Washington and Moscow: a Nuclear
Geopolitical Poker Game, is the fact that since the dissolution of the
Warsaw Pact in 1991 one after another former member as well as former states of
the USSR have been coaxed and in many cases bribed with false promises by
Washington into joining the counter organization, NATO.
Rather than initiate discussions after the 1991 dissolution
of the Warsaw Pact about a systematic dissolution of NATO, Washington has systematically converted NATO
into what can only be called the military vehicle of an American global
imperial rule, linked by a network of military bases from Kosovo to Poland to Turkey to Iraq and Afghanistan. In
1999, former Warsaw Pact members Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic
joined NATO. Bulgaria,
Estonia,
Latvia,
Lithuania,
Romania,
and Slovakia
followed suit in March 2004. Now Washington
is putting immense pressure on the EU members of NATO, especially Germany and France, that
they vote in December to admit Georgia
and Ukraine.
The roots of the conflict
The
specific conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia and Abkhazia has its roots
in the following. First, the southern Ossetes, who until 1990 formed an
autonomous region of the Georgian Soviet Republic, seek to unite in one state
with their co-ethnics in North Ossetia, an autonomous republic of the Russian
Soviet Republic and now the Russian Federation. There is an historically
grounded Ossete fear of violent Georgian nationalism and the experience of
Georgian hatred of ethnic minorities under then Georgian leader Zviad
Gamsakhurdia, which the Ossetes see again under Georgian President Mikhel
Saakashvili. Saakashvili was brought to power with US financing and US covert
regime change activities in December 2003 in what was called the Rose
Revolution. Now the thorns of that rose are causing blood to spill.
Abkhazia
and South Ossetia -- the first a traditional Black Sea resort area, the second
an impoverished, sparsely populated region that borders Russia to the north -- each
has its own language, culture, history. When the Soviet Union collapsed, both
regions sought to separate themselves from Georgia in bloody conflicts -- South
Ossetia in 1990-1, Abkhazia in 1992-4.
In December
1990 Georgia
under Gamsakhurdia sent troops into South Ossetia
after the region declared its own sovereignty. This Georgian move was defeated
by Soviet Interior Ministry troops. Then Georgia declared abolition of the
South Ossete autonomous region and its incorporation into Georgia proper.
Both wars ended with cease-fires that were negotiated by Russia and
policed by peacekeeping forces under the aegis of the recently established
Commonwealth of Independent States. The situation hardened into �frozen
conflicts,� like that over Cyprus.
By late 2005, Georgia
signed an agreement that it would not use force, and the Abkhaz would allow the
gradual return of 200,000-plus ethnic Georgians who had fled the violence. But
the agreement collapsed in early 2006, when Saakashvili sent troops to retake
the Kodori Valley in Abkhazia. Since then
Saakashvili has been escalating preparations for military action.
Critical is
Russia�s
support for the Southern Ossetes. Russia is
unwilling to see Georgia
join NATO. In addition, the Ossetes are the oldest Russian allies in the Caucasus who have provided troops to the Russian army in
many wars. Russia
does not wish to abandon them and the Abkhaz, and fuel yet more ethnic unrest
among their compatriots in the Russian North Caucasus.
In a November 2006 referendum, 99 percent of South
Ossetians voted for independence from Georgia, at a time when most of
them had long held Russian passports. This enabled Russian President Medvedev
to justify his military�s counter-attack of Georgia on Friday as an effort to �protect
the lives and dignity of Russian citizens, wherever they may be.�
For Russia, Ossetia has been an important strategic base near the
Turkish and Iranian frontiers since the days of the czars. Georgia is also
an important transit country for oil being pumped from the Caspian
Sea to the Turkish port
of Ceyhan and a potential
base for Washington
efforts to encircle Tehran.
As far as
the Georgians are concerned, South Ossetia and
Abkhazia are simply part of their national territory, to be recovered at all
costs. Promises by NATO leaders to bring Georgia into the alliance, and
ostentatious declarations of support from Washington, have emboldened Saakashvili to
launch his military offensive against the two provinces, South
Ossetia and Abkhazia. Saakashvili and likely Dick Cheney�s office
in Washington appear to have miscalculated very badly. Russia has made
it clear that it has no intention of ceding its support for South
Ossetia or Abkhazia.
Proxy war
In March
this year as Washington went ahead to recognize the independence of Kosovo in the
former Yugoslavia, making Kosovo a de facto NATO-run territory against the will
of the UN Security Council and especially against Russian protest, Putin
responded with Russian Duma hearings on recognition of Abkhazia, South Ossetia
and Transnistria, a pro-Russian breakaway republic in Moldova. Moscow argued that the West�s logic on Kosovo
should apply as well to these ethnic communities seeking to free themselves
from the control of a hostile state. In mid-April, Putin held out the
possibility of recognition for the breakaway republics. It was a geopolitical
chess game in the strategic Caucasus for the highest stakes --- the future of
Russia itself.
Saakashvili
called then-President Putin to demand he reverse the decision. He reminded
Putin that the West had taken Georgia�s side. This past April at the NATO
summit in Bucharest, Romania, US President Bush proposed accepting Georgia into
NATO�s �Action Plan for Membership,� a precursor to NATO membership. To
Washington�s surprise, 10 NATO member states refused to support his plan,
including Germany, France and Italy.
They argued
that accepting the Georgians was problematic, because of the conflicts in
Abkhazia and South Ossetia. They were in
reality saying that they would not be willing to back Georgia as, under Article
5 of the NATO treaty, which mandates that an armed attack against any NATO
member country must be considered an attack against them all and consequently
requires use of collective armed force of all NATO members, it would mean that
Europe could be faced with war against Russia over the tiny Caucasus Republic
of Georgia, with its incalculable dictator, Saakashvili. That would mean the
troubled Caucasus would be on a hair-trigger to detonate World War III.
Russia
threatens Georgia,
but Georgia
threatens Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Russia looks
like a crocodile to Georgia,
but Georgia
looks to Russia
like the cats� paw of the West. Since Saakashvili took power in late 2003 the
Pentagon has been in Georgia
giving military aid and training. Not only are US military personnel active in Georgia today.
According to an Israeli-intelligence source, DEBKAfile, in 2007, the Georgian President
Saakashvili �commissioned from private Israeli security firms several hundred
military advisers, estimated at up to 1,000, to train the Georgian armed forces
in commando, air, sea, armored and artillery combat tactics. They also have
been giving instruction on military intelligence and security for the central
regime. Tbilisi
also purchased weapons, intelligence and electronic warfare systems from Israel. These
advisers were undoubtedly deeply involved in the Georgian army�s preparations
to conquer the South Ossetian capital Friday.�
DEBKAfile reported further, �Moscow has
repeatedly demanded that Jerusalem halt its military assistance to Georgia,
finally threatening a crisis in bilateral relations. Israel responded by saying that the
only assistance rendered Tbilisi
was �defensive.�� The Israeli news source added that Israel�s interest in Georgia has to
do as well with Caspian oil pipeline geopolitics. �Jerusalem has a strong interest in having
Caspian oil and gas pipelines reach the Turkish terminal port of Ceyhan,
rather than the Russian network. Intense negotiations are afoot between Israel
Turkey, Georgia,
Turkmenistan
and Azarbaijan for pipelines to reach Turkey and thence to Israel�s oil
terminal at Ashkelon and on to its Red Sea port
of Eilat. From there,
supertankers can carry the gas and oil to the Far East
through the Indian Ocean.�
This means
that the attack on South Ossetia is the first battle in a new proxy war between
Anglo-American-Israeli led interests and Russia. The only question is whether
Washington miscalculated the swiftness and intensity of the Russian response to
the Georgian attacks of 8 August.
So far,
each step in the Caucasus drama has put the
conflict on a yet higher plane of danger. The next step will no longer be just
about the Caucasus, or even Europe.
In 1914, it was the �Guns of August� that initiated the Great War. This time
the Guns of August 2008 could be the detonator of World War III and a nuclear
holocaust of unspeakable horror.
Nuclear primacy: the larger strategic danger
Most in the
West are unaware how dangerous the conflict over two tiny provinces in a remote
part of Eurasia has become. What is left out
of most all media coverage is the strategic military security context of the Caucasus dispute.
In my book,
Century of War, I describe the
developments by NATO and most directly by Washington since the end of the Cold
War to systematically pursue what military strategists call Nuclear Primacy.
Put simply, if one of two opposing nuclear powers is able to first develop an
operational anti-missile defense, even primitive, that can dramatically weaken
a potential counter-strike by the opposing side�s nuclear arsenal, the side
with missile defense has �won� the nuclear war.
As mad as
this sounds, it has been explicit Pentagon policy through the last three presidents
from father Bush in 1990, to Clinton and most aggressively, George W. Bush.
This is the issue where Russia
has drawn a deep line in the sand, understandably so. The forceful US effort to
push Georgia
as well as Ukraine
into NATO would present Russia
with the spectre of NATO literally coming to its doorstep, a military threat
that is aggressive in the extreme, and untenable for Russian national security.
This is
what gives the seemingly obscure fight over two provinces the size of Luxemburg
the potential to become the 1914 Sarajevo
trigger to a new nuclear war by miscalculation. The trigger for such a war is
not Georgia�s
right to annex South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
Rather, it is US
insistence on pushing NATO and its missile defense right up to Russia�s door.
F. William Engdahl is
author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order
(Pluto Press), and Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation
(www.globalresearch.ca). This essay is adapted from a book he has just
completed, titled Full Spectrum Dominance: The Geopolitical Agenda Behind
Washington�s Global Military Buildup (release date estimated Autumn 2008). He
may be contacted through his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net.