The popular perception of the recently skyrocketing oil
price is that there is an oil shortage in global energy markets. The perceived
shortage is generally blamed on the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
countries (OPEC) for �insufficient� production, or on countries like China and
India for their increased demand for energy, or on both.
This perception is reinforced -- indeed, largely shaped -- by
the Bush administration and its neoconservative handlers who are eager to
deflect attention away from war and geopolitical turbulence as driving forces
behind the skyrocketing energy prices.
Impressions of an oil shortage are further bolstered by Wall
Street and its financial giants that are taking advantage of the insecurity
created by war and geopolitical turmoil in oil markets and are making fortunes
through manipulative speculation in commodity futures markets.
Perceptions of insufficient oil supply are also heightened
by the recently resuscitated theory of so-called Peak Oil, which maintains that
world production of conventional oil will soon reach -- if it has not already
reached -- a maximum, or peak, and decline thereafter, with grave
socio-economic consequences.[1]
However, claims of an oil shortage are not supported by
facts. Evidence shows that, in reality, there is no discrepancy between
production and consumption of oil on a global level. Citing statistical
evidence of parity between production and consumption of oil, OPEC President
Chakib Khelil recently emphasized that there was no shortage of oil: �As far as
fundamentals are concerned I think we have equilibrium between supply and
demand. . . . In fact right now we have more supply than demand.�[2]
Facts of abundant oil supplies in global markets are now
also being acknowledged and reported by mainstream media. For example, Ed
Wallace of Business Week recently
reported that �that worldwide production of oil has risen 2.5 percent in the
first quarter, while worldwide demand has grown by only 2 percent. Production
is expected to increase by 3.3 percent in the second quarter, and by as much as
4.1 percent by the third quarter. The net result is that the U.S. daily
buffer for oil production against demand, which was a paltry 1.5 million
barrels as recently as 2005, is now up to 3 million barrels in excess capacity
today.�
Wallace then asks, �So what is going on here? Why would our
Energy Secretary say there�s a supply and demand problem when none exists? Why
would he say that speculators have little or nothing to do with the incredibly
high price of oil and gasoline, when it�s clear they do? President Bush -- a
former oilman -- gives the ever-growing demand for gasoline as the primary
reason prices are so high, yet that notion can be dispelled with one minute of
research.�[3]
So, if indeed there is no imbalance between production and
consumption of oil in global markets, how do we then explain the skyrocketing
oil prices?
The answer, in a nutshell, is: war and geopolitical
instability in oil markets. Contrary to the claims of the champions of war and
militarism, of the Wall Street speculators in energy markets, and of the
proponents of Peak Oil, the current oil price shocks are caused largely by the
destabilizing wars and political turbulences in the Middle
East. These include not only the raging wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, but also the danger of a looming war against Iran that would
threaten the flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz.
Close scrutiny of the soaring oil prices shows that anytime
there is a renewed U.S. or
Israeli military threat against Iran,
fuel prices move up several notches. For example, Agence France-Press (AFP)
recently reported, �Crude oil prices went on a record-setting surge Friday as
fears of a new Middle East conflict were fanned by comments from a top Israeli
official about Iran.
New York�s main oil futures contract . . . leapt 10.75 dollars a barrel -- its
biggest one-day jump ever.�[4]
War and political chaos in the Middle
East tend to increase energy prices in a number of ways. For one
thing, as war plunges the U.S. deep into debt, it depreciates the dollar, thereby
appreciating, or inflating, the price of dollar-denominated commodities,
especially oil.
The depreciated dollar tends to raise the price of oil (and
other commodities) in two major ways. First, since oil is priced in U.S.
dollars, oil exporting countries would demand more of the cheaper dollars for
the same barrel of oil in order to maintain the purchasing power of their oil.
Second, when the dollar falls, oil prices rise because investors are more
likely to use their money to buy tangible assets or commodities such as oil and
gold that won�t lose value.
According to a number of energy experts, between 30 and 40 percent
of the recent increases in the price of oil can be attributed to dollar
depreciation. One of the simplest ways to calculate this is to compare the
price per barrel of oil in dollars and euros over the last five years. �The
widening gap between the two [dollar price vs. euro price] indicates that 35
percent of the increase in the price of oil could be attributed to currency
[dollar] devaluation.�[5]
Stronger than the impact of dollar depreciation on the price
of oil has been the impact of manipulative speculation: war and political
instability have served as breeding grounds for hoarding and speculation in
energy futures markets. According to F. William Engdahl, a top expert on energy
and financial markets, �As much as 60
percent of today�s crude oil price is pure speculation driven by large trader
banks and hedge funds. It has nothing to do with the convenient myths of Peak
Oil. It has to do with control of oil and its price. . . . Since the
advent of oil futures trading and the two major London
and New York
oil futures contracts, control of oil prices has left OPEC and gone to Wall
Street. It is a classic case of the tail that wags the dog.�[6]
U.S. Representative Bart T. Stupak (D-Mich), chairman of the
subcommittee investigating commodity market speculation, attributes even a
higher percentage of the oil price hike to market manipulation: �Speculations
now account for about 70 percent of all benchmark crude trading on the New York
Mercantile Exchange, up from 37 percent in 200.�
Wall Street financial giants that created the Third World debt crisis in the late 1970s and early
1980s, the tech bubble in the 1990s, and the housing bubble in the 2000s are
now hard at work creating the oil bubble. By purchasing large numbers of
futures contracts, and thereby pushing up futures prices to even higher levels
than current prices, speculators have provided a financial incentive for giant
futures traders to buy even more oil and place it in storage.
Unrestrained by an appalling lack of regulation, this has
led to a steady rise in crude oil inventories over the last two years,
�resulting in US crude oil inventories that are now higher than at any time in
the previous eight years. The large influx of speculative investment into oil
futures has led to a situation where we have both high supplies of crude oil
and high crude oil prices. . . . In fact, during this period global supplies
have exceeded demand, according to the US Department of Energy.�[7]
The fact that the skyrocketing oil prices of late have been
accompanied by a surplus in global oil markets was also brought to the
attention of President George W. Bush by Saudi officials when he asked them,
during a recent trip to the kingdom, to increase production in order to stem
the rising prices. Saudi officials reminded the president that �there is plenty
of oil on the market. Iran
has put some 30 million barrels of oil that it can�t sell into floating
storage. �If we produced more oil, it wouldn�t find buyers,� says the Saudi
source. It wouldn�t affect the price at all.�[8]
And why producing more oil �wouldn�t affect the price at
all�? Well, because what is driving the soaring oil prices is not shortage but
speculation: �with so much investment money sloshing around in the commodities
markets, the Saudis calculate they have no hope of controlling short-term price
fluctuations. They blame the recent price run-ups on speculation and fear of
shortages [not real shortages], factors they say are beyond their control.�[9]
To sum up, manipulative speculation and dollar depreciation
account for most of the recent increases in the price of oil -- speculation
accounts for nearly 60 percent, dollar depreciation for almost 40 percent. This
is no longer a secret. What remains largely a secret, and needs to be exposed,
however, is the relationship between speculation and dollar depreciation, on
the one hand, and war and geopolitical instability, on the other.
While it is important to point out the impacts of dollar
depreciation and commodity speculation on the price of oil, it is even more
important to show that both of these factors are byproducts of war and
militarism. Not only has the war played a critical role in the weakening of the
dollar (through plunging the U.S.
deep into debt), it has also created favorable grounds for manipulative
speculation in commodity markets, especially energy markets.
Therefore, while efforts to curb speculation in energy
markets (through regulation of the largely unregulated futures markets) or
buttress the dollar from further declining may sound comforting, such efforts
will remain elusive and ineffectual unless the devastating wars and military
adventures in the oil-rich Middle East are terminated; that is, unless the root
causes of currency depreciation and commodity speculation are exposed and cut
out.
References
[1] Robert L. Hirsch, Roger Bezdek, and Robert Wendling, �Peaking
of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, and Risk Management,�
Testimony on Peak Oil before the House Subcommittee on Energy and Industry (7
December 2005),
[2] �No oil shortage in markets,� Reuters
(24 June 2008),
[3] Ed Wallace, �There
Is No Gas Shortage,� Business Week
(1 April 2008),
[4] �Oil Surges to New Heights after Israeli
Warning on Iran,� Agence
France-Press (6 June 2008).
[5] �Record oil prices tied to dollar depreciation,� GeoTimes.org
(15 April 2008).
[6] F. William
Engdahl, �Perhaps 60 percent of Today�s Oil Price Is
Pure Speculation,� financialsense.com (2 May 2008),
[7] Ibid.
[8] Stanley Reed, �Help
from the House of Saud: Why the leading
oil producer wants to cool off the market,� Business Week (29 May 2008),
[9] Ibid.
Ismael Hossein-zadeh,
author of the recently published The
Political Economy of U.S. Militarism (Palgrave-Macmillan 2007), teaches
economics at Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa.