Online Journal
Front Page 
 Special Reports
 News Media
 Elections & Voting
 Social Security
 Editors' Blog
 Reclaiming America
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 The Lighter Side
 The Mailbag
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Join Mailing List

Health Last Updated: Oct 5th, 2007 - 00:44:05

The topic of cancer
By Mickey Z.
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Oct 5, 2007, 00:41

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

When actress Farrah Fawcett recently sought out �alternative� cancer treatment, she was greeted with predictable media scorn. For example, (October 3) characterized such a choice as a �last-ditch attempt to find a cure, one that brings the patient into a murky world of offshore clinics and unproven courses of treatment that are scorned by the medical establishment.�

Speaking of the �medical establishment,� ABC News quoted Barrie Cassileth, chief of the Integrative Medicine Department at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cassileth said patients pursuing �alternative� approaches are �signing their own death certificate.� Dr. Cassileth added: "I would say they are wasting time they could otherwise spend happier and with their families."

Almost 600,000 American die of cancer each year�roughly 1500 per day�and a new case is diagnosed every seven seconds. Yet, the Western medical priesthood stigmatizes alternatives and aggressively defends its Holy Trinity of cancer treatment: surgery, radiation, and of course, chemotherapy.

�We've been told that it's only the treatments of orthodox medicine that have passed careful scientific scrutiny involving double-blind placebo-controlled studies,� write Gary Null and Dr. Debora Rasio. �Concomitantly, we've been told that alternative or complementary health care has no science to back it up, only anecdotal evidence. These two ideas have led to the widely accepted �truths� that anyone offering an alternative or complementary approach is depriving patients of the proven benefits of safe and effective care, and that people not only don't get well with alternative care, but are actually endangered by it.�

This includes the doctors themselves. As reported by John Robbins in Reclaiming Our Health, the percentage of oncologists who, if they had cancer, would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its �ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity� is 75 percent. Conversely, the percentage of Americans with cancer that receive chemotherapy is�you guessed it: 75 percent.

By odd coincidence, there was another October 3 story on the topic of cancer. It seems a Long Island woman was told she had breast cancer, underwent a double mastectomy, and then learned that the lab made a mistake. She didn't have cancer. Deemed a �mix-up,� the whole thing was blamed on �a technician who admitted cutting corners while labeling tissue specimens.�

Obviously, �murky� and �unproven� are in the eye of the beholder. But until American health care consumers move toward awareness, self-education, and prevention, all they�re doing is debating which pen to use when �signing their own death certificate.�

Mickey Z. can be found on the Web at

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
How Bush and the neocons plan to kill Medicare
Pandemic response plan: let the elderly, the sick, and the poor die
How to get universal health care
Despite 5,000 lawsuits, Wyeth and US endocrinologist group hope for HRT comeback
Time to end profit-driven mandatory vaccination racket
For-profit health care: More than one way to scan a CAT
Accused of hiding drug dangers again, Big Pharma starts 2008 defending itself
Medical researchers patented AIDS cure in 1990
The polio vaccine, AIDS, and their US-made viruses
Inside Bush's FDA: A perpetual leaker of insider information and the slipshod testing of generic drugs
So . . . what's this here single-payer health care thing all about anyway?
AIDS estimates surge in America
Teenage girl dies so CIGNA execs can get richer
Drugs not hugs, say pharma linked child psychiatrists
Medicare Part D destroys the lives of senior citizens, the poor, and the sick
Eli Lilly's latest curse: Cymbalta
FDA, industry insiders derail approval of new cancer treatments
The topic of cancer
Why Bush should have signed the children�s health act
S-CHIP veto: The millstone around Bush's neck