Some argue that humans are no better than all other species,
as evidenced by our murderous behavior. Nevertheless, language especially
separates us from the assortment of grunting, singing and yelping animal life
which we domesticate, eat, worship or cage. It has evolved over eons and
assumes a top position in the hierarchy of human achievements. But when we
attach more significance to words and pay less attention to the actions they
represent, we abuse the notion of humanity as a higher form of animal life.
True to our Western dualism, we use ancient written
scriptures as guides to preaching morality, or as rationalizations for
practicing immorality. We do the same with constitutions which establish the
legality of our state structures. Too often we honor words to interpret what we
do as being godly and lawful, while practicing deeds which are in total
contradiction to the legal systems and moral codes they symbolize. The examples
are too numerous for a short essay, but this concerns our language of bigotry,
or what has become labeled as hate speech.
Racial slurs made by a media personality recently opened the
floodgates of criticism, as well as arguments in defense of such talk as free
speech. While many justifiably challenged any supposed right to slur human
beings with such gross disrespect, they often missed the fact that it goes on
all the time and is a money-maker in the radio universe. Much of the tasteless
and irreverent shock jock talk is heard by listeners as honest response to a
kind of speech regulation which is often hypocritical. Rather than changing
hateful realities at the core of our culture, it simply makes them less overt
in speech, while convincing regulators of their own moral righteousness. This
is progress in the way that addressing someone by a publicly accepted title can
somehow blur the fact that he is in prison, or living in poverty, or otherwise
being treated as a second-class citizen.
One of the forward steps taken as a result of the civil
rights movement of the sixties was when whites stopped addressing grown black
men as �boy.� This disrespectful conduct was finally changed, but while this
was a big move in personal healing, it didn�t change much of what actually went
on in the material world. No longer addressing a man as though he were a boy
did not mean that his status, in theory, made him an equal to all other men, in
Using politically correct verbal forms to address people,
while practicing socially incorrect behavior in the treatment of those same
people, exemplifies what a holy book or constitution is often used for: the
justification or rationalization of human indignity, with a legalistic or holy
veneer that does nothing to stop physical inhumanity, but only uses words to
make it sound less inhumane.
People who would never say the �n� word or the �f� word in
public but call people niggers or faggots in private, are part of the problem.
But those who would never use such language at any time are not part of the
solution, as long as their language sensitivity does little or nothing to
change the social realities which treat so many people as less than human.
Support for correct social speech, joined with maintenance of incorrect social
practice, equals hypocrisy, not democracy.
We should never use language that is insulting or
disrespectful to any people, but polite habits of speech mean very little when
society treats so many with a disrespect that amounts to murderous disregard.
When we consign children to underfunded, physically run down schools that can�t
possibly provide the education supposedly guaranteed them by our written laws,
addressing them with verbal respectability masks a cruel and material
disrespect. Using nasty terms like ho or bitch when addressing women is
degrading, but calling someone Miss or Mrs. while forcing her to work at below
minimum wages and raise children in a home with broken windows and no heat, is
hardly a sign of a healthy respect for women.
While our consciousness of how hurtful talk can be has led
to some progress, it has also helped create a kind of language police force
armed with hate laws and moral righteousness. At the same time we have a
material police force armed with the older laws and weapons which are too often
used to pump bullets into an unarmed and innocent man because he looked
suspiciously, criminally black. Neither such a man, nor his family or his
community, are protected from ignorant bigotry by respectfully referring to
him, with politically correct language, as a dead African American.
An old childhood adage retaliated to name calling by
chanting ; sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never harm me. Of
course derogatory names can cause deep personal pain, as can heartbreaking
relationships, loneliness and depression. But physical pain hurts far more, and
when we over stress the correction of language to free it of derogatory words,
we sometimes forget the social pain we allow in everyday performance of even
more derogatory deeds.
We don�t need politically correct speech as much as we need
a political actuality that fits the words we use to profess it. Our credit
culture ultimately demands material actions to back up any immaterial credit
language; landlords and banks will not accept endless promises to pay the rent
or mortgage. Social relations amount to a verbal bill that needs to be paid in
something more than additional promissory verbiage. While we act to enforce
rules of decent speech, we would do well to remember another old adage; actions
speak louder than words. It�s time to put those words into action.
Copyright � 2007
Frank Scott. All rights reserved.
This text may be used
and shared in accordance with the fair-use provisions of U.S. copyright law,
and it may be archived and redistributed in electronic form, provided that the
author is notified and no fee is charged for access. Archiving, redistribution,
or republication of this text on other terms, in any medium, requires the
consent of the author.
Scott writes political commentary which appears in the Coastal Post, a monthly
publication from Marin County, California, and on numerous web sites, and
on his shared blog at legalienate.blogspot.com.
Contact him at email@example.com.