What a fiasco! In the saga of the sailors, truth takes a
back seat. Were they in Iranian waters? When they were in Iran they admitted
trespass. In Britain, they changed their stories. Now some of them have sold
those stories to the highest bidder with the blessing of Britain�s Defense
Department, which has now changed its mind and halted further sales while it
reviews the rules.
During a press conference six of 15 freed sailors and
Marines spoke of being coerced by Iranian officials to offer their services as
propaganda tools.
Were they beaten or tortured? Were their families
threatened? Were they subjected to stress positions, strobe lighting, and
deafening music? Were they stripped naked, photographed and humiliated by an
Iranian version of Lindy England?
Not at all! Apparently, they were initially lined up facing
a wall before being handed pajamas, made to sleep on piles of blankets in small
cells and given three meals a day, cigarettes and made-to-wear blindfolds
during trips to the toilet.
Later, they were allowed to meet together for several hours
each evening in full glare of the media. They said they agreed to sign
confessions when they were told such documents represented the key to their
freedom.
At the press conference broadcast around the world, they
were portrayed as heroes who had come through a great ordeal with honor. They
couldn�t find one good word for the Iranians. One sailor said they were not his
favorite people. In fact, there was little honor to be found in all this.
There is no doubt as prisoners in a foreign land they were
intimidated by circumstances and had to play ball with their captors to some
extent for their own survival. They may, indeed, have suffered an ordeal but
given the relaxed demeanor of most of them while �guests� of the Iranian
government, suspicions that they may have exaggerated the ordeal for the
benefit of the Western media may be well founded.
Put simply, for captives whose very lives were in peril,
their smiles were too broad. Their body language spoke of people with little to
fear as they chatted amongst themselves, tucked in to a meal or sat around
playing chess.
Once the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad had announced
his magnanimous gesture of sending them home as an Easter gift to the British
people, dressed in new suits, they were effusive with their thanks and
handshakes and seemed delighted with their goody bags, stuffed with pistachios
and souvenir vases.
As detainees go in today�s harsh climate, and in comparison
with the way America treats its detainees, the Brits were treated exceptionally
well. The jury is still out on whether or not they strayed into Iranian waters,
but we do know that, prior to their arrest, one was interviewed by Sky News and
he admitted that their duties included gathering intelligence on Iran. As
self-declared spies, they could have fared a lot worse.
Admittedly it was unwise of Iran to ratchet up tensions in
the Gulf at a time when an American armada is in the neighborhood and George W.
Bush is said to be itching for a fight but morality is on Iran�s side for
several reasons.
First, those waters are disputed. There are no absolutes as
during the Iran-Iraq War Saddam Hussein tore up a treaty.
Second, Iranians have more right over those waters than
Britons, whose government took their country into an illegal war with Iran�s
neighbors on the basis of a pack of lies.
Third, five Iranian diplomats were snatched by the US from
an Iranian mission in the northern Iraqi town of Irbil and until now have not
been given consular access.
A sixth Iranian diplomat, Jalal Sharafi, who was freed last
week -- some believe in a quid pro quo -- after being seized in Iraq, said he
had been tortured and interrogated by the CIA.
Another argument on this subject centers on the question of
which side won -- Britain or Iran?
The more hawkish in Britain and the US say Britain was
humiliated and condemn the servicemen and woman for giving out a lot more than
name, rank and number. The word �traitors� was flashed on the Fox News� screen
during one talk show.
Previously, Fox News� anchors had indulged in a veritable
orgy of anti-Iranian spin by parading former American Embassy hostages who each
told lurid tales of mock executions and beatings. In response to the video
where British sailors were shown feasting, one said with absolute certainty
that the food would be whipped away from their mouths as soon as the cameras
were turned off. Someone should tell him it�s 2007 not post-revolution 1979.
When it was all over one of the Fox and Friends teams couldn�t resist getting
in a cheap shot at Iran by referring to Iran�s gift of �cheap suits.�
Others respect Prime Minister Tony Blair�s soft diplomacy
that was packed with an underlying punch that resulted in a happy homecoming.
They say it was a win for moderation. However, when speaking to the press
shortly after the surprise release, Blair didn�t look like a winner. He has
rarely appeared as grumpy and instead of thanking his Iranian counterpart he
grasped the opportunity to accuse Iran of aiding the resistance in Iraq.
The 15 navy personnel didn�t look like winners either. They
swapped their suits for uniforms on board the flight from Tehran to Heathrow
and also exchanged their grins for serious, pained expressions no doubt in
realization of the questions they would face from their superiors and also from
a confused public as well as a critical press.
The bottom line is this. The British detainees are lucky.
They may sell their stories for hundreds of thousands of pounds.
They will dine out on their adventures for the rest of their
lives and now that the British media have opted to swallow the version of
events as told in Britain, they will forever be perceived as heroic. In
reality, they were compliant pawns, used both by Iran and by their own country
to make a political point.
The fate of the Iranian diplomats presumably being held in a
US hellhole on the lines of Abu Ghraib or Camp Cropper is less certain. They
were legitimately in Iraq issuing visas to Iraqi Kurds and their diplomatic
immunity has been grossly violated. But with all the brouhaha over the �poor
Brits� does anyone care?
Linda S. Heard is a British specialist writer on Middle
East affairs. She welcomes feedback and can be contacted by email at heardonthegrapevines@yahoo.co.uk.