This is difficult to write. It is a delicate subject, which
is why it is one that isn�t discussed or written about very much. Yet it is
also a very important subject. Over 3,000 Troopies have been killed in action,
which raises the question: �Did they die in vain?�
Many argue that we must continue fighting in Iraq so those
who have died did not die in vain. But should more then die so they would not have
died in vain? You can see how delicate the topic is to those who have lost
someone close to them.
I lost a friend whose name is on the Vietnam Wall and
several who died as a result of exposure to Agent Orange. I didn�t -- and still
don�t -- want them to have died in vain, so I understand how many people, who
have lost someone, must hang on to the thought that they did not die in vain.
It gives a lot of meaning to their deaths, which might otherwise be
meaningless.
I have a friend who was a Marine that fought in the Vietnam
War. He was so gung-ho he was called �Gunny.� He was terribly wounded in the
fighting at Con Thien in September 1967, and was put in the Dying Corner. He
refused to die, and has since been through physical rehabilitation to the point
that he has raised a family, rides his motorcycle, has made over 1,000
parachute jumps, and conquered enormous emotional problems stemming from the
war.
�Gunny� is one tough Marine and an absolutely loyal patriot,
yet he also joined Vietnam Veterans Against The War in 1970. I would like to
share with readers what he said about his decision to protest the Vietnam War.
Perhaps it will also explain why people who consistently support the Troopies
also want them to get out of Iraq.
�I joined VVAW in 1970 because, by 1970, I couldn�t lie to
myself anymore and convince myself it meant anything . . . I�d been a
closet-not pacifist-but closet antiwar person for quite awhile. But nobody knew
because I wasn�t about to tell them, because I felt like I had to protect my
partners who were overseas. And that meant any grunt, any man in the infantry
who was out there facing death. And, by God, I had to protect them. And the
only way I knew was to try to make it mean something by telling people that it
did. It�s kind of like going through the motions and hoping the motions will
create the meaning. But finally I realized that there was nothing I could do to
create meaning. If it wasn�t there, it wasn�t there.�
Senator Kerry, in an appearance before Congress in April
1971, asked, �How do you ask a man to be the last to die for a mistake?�
Must we now ask Bush, in regard to Iraq, �How do you ask
someone to be the last to die for a lie?� Bush and Cheney would reply, �It�s
easy.� Bush said that the Iraq war would be a �comma� in history.
My
God! Are our people fighting to have a place in history as a �comma� and dying
in vain for a lie? And must more die so others will not have died in vain?
Think about it.