Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 Progressive Press
 Barnes and Noble
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Feb 16th, 2007 - 00:48:40


Serious questions about Bush-Gates Iran mortar allegation
By Larry Chin
Online Journal Associate Editor


Feb 16, 2007, 00:46

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

In the wake of purported �strong evidence� that mortars used to attack US soldiers in Iraq were manufactured by Iran, disturbing new questions are being raised about the veracity of the claims made by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and President George W. Bush.

Here is one analysis, the first on this topic, by Ray Hanania, which also contains a link to photographic evidence: Serious questions about the mortar, Bush and the media.

The photograph is of an 81 mm shell. But the serial numbers on the shell are in English. Would a mortar �manufactured by Iran� have English lettering (if so, why)? Why an American-style 81mm shell instead of a more typical Russian-manufactured 82mm shell? How and where were these munitions really made and distrubuted? Is it an American shell? Is it an American-style shell that was brokered globally? If so, how did this shell find its way to Iran (or did it)?

Is it planted evidence by the Bush administration�s intelligence apparatus?  Is this just one of the many planted lies being used to set up the upcoming attack on Iraq? (See Fabricating the case against Iran.)

Iranian officials have called the mortar evidence a complete fabrication. In a related development, another allegation, that Iran is harboring Iraq insurgency leader Al-Sadr, has been denied by Al-Sadr�s organization.

Neither Gates nor Bush have been grilled or pressured to provide any verifiable proof to back their claims. They have not provided any proof on the source of this �evidence�-- if there is one.

The tidal wave of disinformation is just beginning.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Never again to antiwar battle fatigue
Tuesday�s market meltdown; Greenspan�s �invisible hand�
Middle East is plagued by covert operations
A democracy in crisis: Who is really in control?
The sham of nuke power & Patrick Moore
Why the FBI got away with the first WTC bombing
Vultures circle overhead to feast off Iraq�s carrion
Operation FALCON and the looming police state
Cheney is recklessly �Bob�-ing Iraq & Iran
Peace and reparations for a confederated Iraq
Washington�s shifting alliances in Iraq
All roads lead to checkpoints
�Doomsday� Dick and the plague of frogs
Another U.S. escalation in Afghanistan?
Dying for a comma
Democrats reinforce �war on terrorism� lie
Shame on shame
America�s death march
A trying answer to a legitimate question
How long will we be in Iraq?