Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 Progressive Press
 Barnes and Noble
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Jan 12th, 2007 - 00:26:30


More troops for Iraq? Just say no.
By Carl Conetta
Online Journal Guest Writer


Jan 12, 2007, 00:10

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

There is no way forward In Iraq except out. This is the grim truth that the Bush administration has eluded for years and eludes still. Despite 45 months of war, three "troop surges", and multiple "major offensives", the level of insurgent activity in Iraq has climbed steadily.

Even if we were to accept, at this late date, that our troubles in Iraq are due to our having invested too few bodies, why should we believe that a small increment can turn the tide? For those who put their faith in "force density", the president�s initiative cannot be very satisfying. The numbers will still fall far short of what historical experience suggests is often necessary for success in counter-insurgency and stability operations. Necessary, but not sufficient -- it is worth pointing out.

There is good reason to believe that not even 250,000 troops could achieve what the administration intends in Iraq. Critics have variously targeted the administration�s strategy, planning, priorities, and level of effort. In fact, the problem is the mission itself, which has been overly ambitious and intrusive

What the Bush administration has sought to do, at the point of a gun, is thoroughly reinvent Iraq -- its public institutions, legal system, security structures, economy, and political order. This is a revolution as profound as any, but foreign in origin, design, and implementation. It should not be surprising that these efforts -- which have flooded the country with nearly 300,000 foreign handlers -- have bred resentment and worse.

The most disconcerting data from Iraq concerns popular attitudes toward US forces. The percentage of Iraqis desiring US withdrawal within a year or less has steadily increased as has the percentage who support attacks on US troops. Indeed, strong majorities in both the Sunni and Shia communities now favor such withdrawal and support such attacks. This leaves no grounds for optimism regarding the effects of adding troops.

Carl Conetta is co-director of the Project on Defense Alternatives (PDA).

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Bush speaks; nation plays dead
No escalation! End the war against Iraq now!
The only real solution to the Iraq debacle: Impeachment and withdrawal
More troops for Iraq? Just say no.
A pathetic ploy, another "signing statement" and that "goddamned piece of paper"
Darn those Iraqis
Chain Rudy�s �presidential campaign plan� to his wrist
New kids on the block confront the imperial bully: why i�m smiling
Focus is on Bush's new strategy
A new Congress? Not when it comes to Iran
The "Surge" to screw Iraq out of its oil
Bush must have his victory, no matter how pyrrhic
George Will and the minimum wage
America, where are you?
The stench of "politics as usual" and the anger from below
The death of Saddam and buried secrets
Our addiction to oil is fueling a potential Middle East inferno
Bush, once again, sidling up to the punch bowl
New Year reflections
Dispatch from the Chinese landfill