Exemplified by the furor over the so-called �Ground Zero mosque� in New York, and rumors of a new Al-Qaeda �mastermind,� 9/11 �war on terrorism� propaganda has been ramped up to deafening levels by various political factions.

Nearly a decade since Bush/Cheney�s 9/11 false flag deception, a fearful, self-destructive American mass public remains fully brainwashed by �war on terrorism� deception -- ignorant of history, and militantly oblivious to facts.

�Ground Zero mosque�: the art of missing the point

The ludicrous uproar over plans to build a Muslim community center in New York, the so-called �Ground Zero mosque� has dominated mainstream corporate news headlines. Political players from all sides, including President Barack Obama have joined the fray, attempting to prove themselves the superior �anti-terrorist,� or the better �commemorator of 9/11, when 3,000 people were killed by Muslim terrorists.� The right wing is going berserk, gleefully.

Heated arguments have exploded around religion, tolerance, democracy, etc. --everything except the only fact that matters: 9/11 was a false flag operation, courtesy of the Bush-Cheney administration, carried out by an elite consensus, in order to justify the �war on terrorism,� and everything that came with it. Mass murder. Unending resource conquest. A police state within US borders. Open criminality.

The perpetual threat posed by a fabricated outside enemy, and a militarized, fearful populace, remain the centerpieces of elite policy, and they have been consistently maintained by both Bush/Cheney and Obama administrations. The demonization of Muslims continues to facilitate pillage.

While violent hatred continues to be directed at Muslims (and all �foreigners�), the criminals who truly massacred 3,000 people in the World Trade Center continue to enjoy power, wealth, and high positions of world �leadership� and remain in control of virtually every aspect of society. Those who perpetuated the cover-up (including the Obama administration) still �run the world,� to mass public enthusiasm.

As the �Ground Zero mosque� mushrooms into a full-blown election year battle cry by one faction or another, not a whisper of truth appears in any corporate media coverage. Meanwhile, the exhaustive and available information thoroughly exposing and destroying the official �war on terrorism� narrative is known to a minority of people whose critical faculties remain intact.

Mike Ruppert�s Crossing the Rubicon exposed why and how 9/11 was likely carried out by Bush/Cheney. Michel Chossudovsky�s America�s �War on Terrorism� thoroughly exposed the 9/11 deception, as well as the fact that 1) the �war on terrorism� is a fabrication that serves as the eternal pretext for global war, and that 2) �Al-Qaeda� and other �Islamic jihad� fronts are military-intelligence assets that have been continuously supported, managed and �run� by the CIA and affiliates such as Pakistan�s ISI on behalf of Anglo-American geostrategic interests (notably oil) going back to the Cold War. A vast number of researchers (all derided as �9/11 truthers�), such David Ray Griffin, continue to detail various aspects of the case including physical evidence.

Oblivious to the availability of this mountain of �conspiracy fact,� the vast majority of the population chooses to embrace the Big Lie.

New �Al-Qaeda� mastermind named

In recent weeks, mainstream corporate news headlines have exploded with the �revelation� that �Al-Qaeda� has a new leader of global operations �in charge of planning future attacks�: Adnan Shukrijumah

According to Miami-based FBI counterterrorism agent Greg LeBlanc, whose Associated Press interview in early August is the single source for the new spate of repeated headlines, Shukrijumah is alleged to be a 15-year resident of the US �intimately familiar with American society,� and is the son of a Muslim cleric trained in Saudi Arabia. He lived in Miramar, Florida, before joining terror training camps in Afghanistan in the 1990s, in order to fight the persecution of Muslims in Bosnia, Chechnya and elsewhere.

Tagged by LeBlanc as the successor to his former boss, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, (KSM), and taking orders directly from Osama bin Laden. A clip of Shukrijumah posted by the FBI is gibberish.

There is nothing new about the Shukrijumah narrative. It is an intelligence �legend� years in the making.

Chaim Kupferberg, whose classic analysis of post-9/11 �terror� propaganda

(Part 1 and Part Two) are definitive, offered the following thoughts on Shukrijumah in 2004 in a piece titled The �Official� Operative Clique for the Next 9/11.

To quote Kupferberg at length [my emphasis in bold]:

�I�m sure many of you out there are noticing a unified narrative taking shape in advance of the next expected attack. In calibrated drips and dollops, the mainstream media, in partnership with the 9/11 panel, are laying the evidentiary trail pointing to the next �Atta� and his insular cell, which apparently already seems to be �in place� stateside.

�Having no access at all to any insider reports, one can almost foretell the Official Legend that will follow in the wake of this clique�s first big explosion into the public consciousness - just by reading the mainstream news.

�Certainly, three of these major operatives -- Adnan Shukrijumah, Abderrouf Jdey, and Aafia Siddiqui - are already being linked together. But Shukrijumah and Jdey are the ones to watch, for they are being intimately seeded into the Padilla/dirty bomb and Ahmed Ressam/Canadian clique/West Coast threads of 9/11.

�Recently, Shukrijumah was mentioned as the guy likely doing surveillance of the New York buildings in the latest terror alert. But that was supposed to be old information. Yet Shukrijumah has been showing up all over the radar in the past year alongside Jdey and Siddiqui.

�When Abu Musab Zarqawi was publicly unveiled by Colin Powell before the UN in February 2003, he had yet to make his very public splash as the next Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. But in the opening months of 2004 - as I surmised back in October 2003 - Zarqawi would lay his own foundation in the public mind (particularly by way of the Daniel Pearl-like Berg killing) as the guy tagged to head up the next �big one.�

�If the Ressam-connected Canadian clique is involved, the likely target is the U.S. West Coast. I suspect this is the case due to three items: the bulletin last May that alerted the public to Shukrijumah, Jdey, Siddiqui, Gahdan, el-Maati, and others; a reported sighting the next day of Shukrijumah and Jdey at a Denny�s in Colorado (they stated that they were �from Iran� and were en route to the West Coast from New York); the release, two weeks later, of the official 9/11 staff report that now placed Jdey (in cahoots with Moussaoui) as an original member of an aborted 9/11 �second wave� attack on the West Coast; and a reported sighting of Shukrijumah at a nuclear research facility in Ontario (while el-Maati had previously been reported casing nuclear facilities near Ottawa).

� . . . Shukrijumah (aka �the next Atta�) apparently seems to be threaded into the 1993 bomb plots by way of his father�s connection to Clement Hampton-El. But more strangely, it seems that Shukrijumah will make his way into the Oklahoma City Bomb thread by way of his Florida connection with �dirty bomb� guy Jose Padilla. To shore up the Oklahoma thread, we also have the Zarqawi/Moussaoui/ Nick Berg connection.

�But let�s step back and take a stab at guessing at what is happening here. The new legends will be used to strengthen the foundations of the old ones. In parallel to the official account, however, the existing counter-legends will also be beefed up. In short, the narratives are getting all too muddled with the growing interlinking chains. The growing complexity of these new interlinking legends will operate to turn off a good portion of those who might be seriously interested in examining the truth behind 9/11.

�And what of the rest of us? Will we be locked in a never-ending cycle of polarized argument - with each of us picking his favorite conspiracy thread? How many of us will look at Shukrijumah and see the fingerprints of Iran? How many of us will look at the Canadian clique and sense the hand of Syria behind it all? And if they find that the next operation was pulled off with forged New Zealand passports, how many of us will dig up the newspaper account of the Mossad/ New Zealand passport scandal and go �Aha! Once again the Israelis!�

�And what about the anthrax thread? In recent months, a writer by the name of Ross Getman has been posting accounts that read like excerpts from a future Official 9/11 Sequel Report. Going by Getman�s writings, it would appear that a possible Boston connection would involve anthrax by way of Aafia Siddiqui�s connection to Brandeis University and its anthrax facility. Also note that a first sighting of Shukrijumah and Jdey a year ago occurred in Maine, where they were spotted driving with a Massachusetts license plate.

�So, to sum up: Shukrijumah seems to be part of a �dirty bomb� or radiological thread, while Siddiqui seems to be part of an anthrax thread. �Perhaps the Shukrijumah/Jdey/Siddiqui clique is planning a bi-coastal attack involving radiological materials (or perhaps an attack on a nuclear facility) and a simultaneous attack involving anthrax. Shukrijumah has been marketed as an �Atta-level� pilot.

�Whatever the case, a definite evidentiary trail seems to be clearly laid so as to give the impression of the dots connecting up. Shukrijumah was also spotted recently in the Honduras, but I wouldn�t give that one much credence. The Denny�s item seems the most likely to be resurrected post-facto as an example of institutional incompetence and blindess. Perhaps the Honduras item was meant to give the impression that Shukrijumah was not yet in the U.S.

� . . . In the aftermath of this next one, there will be those who will point to new instances of incompetence and blindness - who will say that the dots couldn�t be connected. Hopefully, perhaps none of the above will ever come to pass. Perhaps Shukrijumah, Jdey, and Siddiqui will never make their �historical� mark - and we�ve all been treated to nothing more than a cunningly orchestrated campaign of fear-mongering by the government.

�Whatever the case, it seems that a very clear narrative - with accompanying threads - is being built up for potential use. In the event this particular chapter of the narrative ever goes �operational� . . . well, at least you�ll all know that the mainstream media had put the dots in place beforehand.�

In the years since Kupferberg�s dead-on prediction, Shukrijumah has indeed �emerged� gradually. Attorney General John Ashcroft labeled Shukrijumah a �clear and present danger� in 2004. In 2009, authorities named Shukrijumah as a co-conspirator in the highly questionable New York subway bomb plot.

Shukrijumah has over the years been picked up as a cause c�l�bre by right-wing hacks such as Michelle Malkin, and the infamous Gerald Posner, who has built an entire malodorous career helping cover-up government crimes as a favored �anti-conspiracy� media shill.

There are many reasons for Shukrijumah to explode in official prominence now. President Barack Obama has declared an end to �combat operations in Iraq,� while maintaining the permanent US military presence in the country and a continuous �anti-terror� operation against �Al-Qaeda� in Iraq. The administration shifts forces to Afghanistan, and continues ramping up its long-promised goal of escalating the �war on terrorism� throughout Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc. With this in the works, along with congressional mid-term elections looming in the fall, all of Washington, from the White House and the FBI to the congressional nominees are refreshing the �terrorism� pretext.

It should be noted that no analysis was done by the various media organs to corroborate the details of LeBlanc�s story before it was repeated verbatim across the media. LeBlanc has also not been vetted as a credible, unbiased source.

Whether Shukrijumah is a intelligence �legend,� a low-level intelligence asset, or the �mastermind� that FBI Agent LeBlanc claims, the discussion still collapses when viewed against the backdrop of known historical and post-9/11 facts. �Terrorism� is still a red herring.

As amply documented over the years by Michel Chossudovsky and others, �Islamic terrorism,� including �Al-Qaeda,� the Taliban, etc. are assets of the CIA a myth designed to obscure a vast covert operation and war plan. The �Militant Islamic Network� was created by the CIA, and has continued to operate on behalf of Anglo-American military-intelligence interests. �Terrorists� were key Washington CIA assets during the wars in Kosovo, Chechnya, etc.. Shukrijumah�s boss, Osama bin Laden is a product of the CIA, is a military-intelligence asset who may be dead, or a myth.

Covert Action Quarterly featured the following summation box in many of its post-9/11 issues:

9/11 cover-up continues:

Carter administration=CIA-Islamists of Afghanistan*

Carter administration=CIA=Islamists of Iran

al-Qaeda=Saudi=CIA-=Reagan administration collaborations in Afghanistan and Sudan

al-Qaeda=CIA=Clinton administration collaborations in Albania, Algeria, Bosnia, Chechnya, Iraq, Libya, Sudan�

We can now add to this:

Bush/Cheney and Obama administrations=CIA=Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan

Put succinctly by Mike Ruppert in Crossing the Rubicon:

�Given the degree of documented intelligence penetration of al Qaeda; the fact that Osama bin Laden had been a CIA asset during the first Afghan conflict against the Soviets; the fact that a number of the so-called hijackers and/or al Qaeda members had been trained in CIA training camps in Chechnya; had fought in CIA/US-sponsored guerrilla conflicts (e.g. in Kosovo with the KLA in 2000), or had received military training at US installations; given all that, it is reasonable to assume that one or more top al Qaeda officials were in fact double or triple agents. They worked to further an agenda originating out of Washington, strongly influenced by Tel Aviv, rather than out of some ill-defined Muslim hatred of the US. In this class I would include people like Khalid Sheikh Muhammad (KSM), Ramzi bin al-Shibh, and Mohammad Atta.�

� . . . In covert operations, the best kind of an asset is one that has no idea who is really �running� him. That is not to say that I don�t believe there are terrorists out there who would do any kind of damage they possibly could to the United States. Even if there weren�t any before 9/11 (and there were), the US has gone out of its way to create animosity against this country that is in full flower all over the globe. What is clear is that the government�s assertions that 19 hijackers, funded from caves in Afghanistan, were able to excecute what happened on September 11th is beyond ludicrous. It is also that case that the government has never proven to anybody by any standard other than that used by Randolph Hearst.�

What about Shukrijumah�s link to the New York subway bomb plot? That incident has been linked to Jaish-e-Muhammad, a CIA front. Therefore, any Shukrijumah connection to this event also points to way to the CIA.

It is amusing that a USA Today article about Shukrijumah notes how the hunt for �Al-Qaeda� always comes back to Florida. If the writer of this piece had truly dug into Florida�s long history of covert operations, dirty politics (the Bushes), narco-trafficking, etc., the writer would not have to ask why.

Investigative journalist Dan Hopsicker exposed the Florida links to the so-called 9/11 hijackers, including their military training, and connections to Floridians with military-intelligence and the Bush family, in a series of articles, and in the video Mohammad Atta and the Venice Flying Circus. From a propaganda perspective, placing Shukrijumah into this same framework simply makes sense, as Kupferberg notes.

According to Shukrijumah�s mother, her son is �not a mastermind, but a nice boy� who last contacted her right after 9/11, allegedly from Afghanistan. If Shukrijumah�s radicalization was triggered by 9/11 itself, one could argue that (assuming that he is a real terrorist) he is yet another by-product of Bush/Cheney�s violence.

The Big Lie redux

Both the �Ground Zero mosque� and Shukrijumah stories have gone �viral.� The noise surrounding both is certain to be even more deafening, even more outrageous, as election season intensifies, and Obama ramps up the war. Another anniversary of 9/11 approaches, complete with tear-soaked howling over the official lies.

The �terror� threat -- perpetual fear of a fabricated outside enemy -- is central to Anglo-American geostrategy. It is being strenuously nurtured. Insanity continues to prevail.

�Al-Qaeda� the eternal covert operation and propaganda apparatus, is being given yet another new boogeyman�s face. All issues surrounding 9/11 still set off paroxysms of fear, rage, hatred, and violence, nearly a decade later.

The militant public embrace of �war on terrorism� lies underscores how the 9/11 false flag operation has succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of the Anglo-American war criminals who orchestrated it.