Months, years and then decades slip by. Despite an avalanche
of information burying me every day, I had not read or heard anything about
9/11 truth for many, many months. Sometimes movements become so marginalized
that they no longer have enough vitality to stay within the consciousness of
very many people.
I am sure, of course, that there are 9/11 truthers out there
that still give and attend talks, write and receive emails and have lively
conversations about the insanity of the official government story about 9/11
surviving and various alternative explanations of what really happened. Yet, in
not too many weeks, another 9/11 anniversary will be here. And, maybe then, I
will be hit again with chatter about what really happened on that past fateful
and awful day. But today it is this writing by me that is my 9/11 truth: Hardly
any Americans are concerned about 9/11 truth and there is no real interest in
Congress in launching a new investigation.
So I went to a few 9/11 websites of groups that I am
affiliated with; they were still there. And then I did a Google news search for
9/11 truth. Here is what I gleaned.
The first news item was something that the head of
WikiLeaks.org, that was very much in the news lately because it was
distributing a huge amount of materials on the war in Afghanistan, had said
about the 9/11 truth movement: �I�m constantly annoyed that people are
distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide
evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.� This did not
surprise me, even though, personally, I still believe that the US government
conspired to keep the full truth about 9/11 hidden from the public.
But then I quickly came across a story in a local New
Hampshire newspaper about a recent 9/11 truth group participation in a local
event, and that heartened me that the diehard truthers were still marching
proudly. Indeed, this was noted: �We would like to extend our warmest thanks to
[the former Keene Mayor, State Representative, and one of our World War II
veterans] for bravely standing tall and marching with our group. Your presence
commands respect and it was indeed an honor to have you all join us. We
sincerely appreciate your willingness to show support for our efforts to
publicize the need for a new 9/11 investigation.�
And I was heartened to learn that the fourth of July parade
in Takoma Park, MD, where I once lived, had a float for the 9/11 Truth Now
group in it.
Back to the WikiLeaks situation: this website has rightfully
received incredible worldwide attention by the mainstream media for its ability
to obtain and publicize key documents shedding light where the government and
corporations don�t want it. For 9/11 truthers, here is something that merits
very serious thought. If we are correct, then a fairly large number of people
had a hand, probably as part of a black ops action, designing and executing
many things, not the least of which was the controlled demolition of the three
World Trade Center buildings. So why have none of these people leaked materials
to a place like WikiLeaks? Could they all have been so bought off or threatened
to stay quiet? Perhaps. But I must admit I find the lack of leakers troubling.
Of course, if the government had pursued prosecution of the
many government workers that did nothing to prevent the 9/11 actions for, say,
criminally negligent homicide, then perhaps some would have cut deals and blown
the whistle. But as far as I can remember no civilian or military personnel
were nailed for failure to detect and prevent the terrorism.
Don�t get me wrong. I am not saying that just because no
9/11 whistleblowers have come forward with compelling evidence that the
official story is believable. Not at all. What the 9/11 truth movement needs,
however, is a steady focus on the considerable evidence that undermines the
official story, rather than on evidence supporting various alternative theories
of what happened.
In this regard, the website of Architects and Engineers for
9/11 truth http://ae911truth.org/ remains
as one of the best sources of serious, trustworthy information. The group has
an event on September 9 this year in Washington, DC and also visits to various
members of Congress to lobby for a new investigation. But if they do not offer
draft legislation it will be a waste of time.
My other favorite website is Alan Miller�s wonderful
Patriots Question 9/11 http://patriotsquestion911.com/,
where so many credible people have openly questioned the official story, more
than enough to convince the most skeptical people to support a new
investigation. Thirdly, I urge people to use the Scholars for 9/11 Truth
website http://911scholars.org/ because
it also offers useful, reliable information.
Also impressive is the continued work of the NYCCAN group at
have asked the Manhattan District Attorney to investigate the collapse of WTC
7. Recently, they had 400 supporters mail or fax the DA the attached letter,
which focuses on the destruction of evidence at the WTC site. The group thinks
this is the most likely route the DA would take to opening any kind of
investigation into 9/11.
Yes, the movement is still alive. But when will it succeed
in getting a new credible and comprehensive government investigation? That is
When people in the public spotlight do not support the truth
movement, as the head of WikiLeaks has done, it is a sign that success remains
elusive. One truther exception was Daniel Sunjata, a lead actor from the
popular FX television show �Rescue Me.� The coming anniversary of 9/11 will
most likely show that we still lack a critical mass of public demand for a new
government investigation. One glimmer of hope might be the wide scale rejection
of incumbents in Congress. Do candidates for Congress support a new
investigation? The truth movement should get their act together and spread the
word that truthers should only vote for candidates supporting a new
Joel S. Hirschhorn can be contacted through www.delusionaldemocracy.com.