On November 8, three men were executed by the government of Indonesia for terrorist attacks on two nightclubs in Bali in 2002 that took the lives of 202 people, more than half of whom were Australians, Britons and Americans.

The Associated Press [1] reported that �the three men never expressed remorse, saying the suicide bombings were meant to punish the United States and its Western allies for alleged atrocities in Afghanistan and elsewhere.�

During the recent US election campaign, John McCain and his followers repeated a sentiment that has become a commonplace -- that the War on Terrorism has been a success because there hasn�t been a terrorist attack against the United States since September 11, 2001; as if terrorists killing Americans is acceptable if it�s done abroad.

Since the first American strike on Afghanistan in October 2001, there have been literally scores of terrorist attacks against American institutions in the Middle East, South Asia and the Pacific, more than a dozen in Pakistan alone: military, civilian, Christian, and other targets associated with the United States. The year following the Bali bombings saw the heavy bombing of the US-managed Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia, the site of diplomatic receptions and 4th of July celebrations held by the American Embassy. The Marriott Hotel in Pakistan was the scene of a major terrorist bombing just two months ago. All of these attacks have been in addition to the thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan against US occupation, which Washington officially labels an integral part of the War on Terrorism. Yet American lovers of military force insist that the War on Terrorism has kept the United States safe.

Even the claim that the War on Terrorism has kept Americans safe at home is questionable. There was no terrorist attack in the United States during the 6 1/2 years prior to the one in September 2001 -- not since the April 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. It would thus appear that the absence of terrorist attacks in the United States is the norm.

An even more insidious myth of the War on Terrorism has been the notion that terrorist acts against the United States can be explained, largely, if not entirely, by irrational hatred or envy of American social, economic, or religious values, and not by what the United States does to the world; i.e., US foreign policy. Many Americans are mighty reluctant to abandon this idea. Without it the whole paradigm -- that we are the innocent good guys and they are the crazy, fanatic, bloodthirsty bastards who cannot be talked to but only bombed, tortured and killed -- falls apart. Statements like the one above from the Bali bombers blaming American policies for their actions are numerous, coming routinely from Osama bin Laden and those under him. [2]

Terrorism is an act of political propaganda, a bloody form of making the world hear one�s outrage against a perceived oppressor, graffiti written on the wall in some grim, desolate alley. It follows that if the perpetrators of a terrorist act declare what their motivation was, their statement should carry credibility, no matter what one thinks of their cause or the method used to achieve it.

Notes

1. Associated Press, November 9, 2008

2. See my article Myth and Denial in the War Against Terrorism: Just why do terrorists terrorize?