Okay, let�s get the obvious out of the way. It was historic. I choked up a number of times, tears came to my eyes, even though I didn�t vote for him. I voted for Ralph Nader for the fourth time in a row.

During the past eight years when I�ve listened to news programs on the radio each day I�ve made sure to be within a few feet of the radio so I could quickly change the station when that preposterous man or one of his disciples came on; I�m not a masochist, I suffer fools very poorly, and I get bored easily.

Sad to say, I�m already turning the radio off sometimes when Obama comes on. He doesn�t say anything, or not enough, or not often enough. Platitudes, clich�s, promises without substance, �hope and change,� almost everything without sufficient substance, �change and hope,� without specifics, designed not to offend. What exactly are the man�s principles? He never questions the premises of the empire. Never questions the premises of the �War on Terror.�

I�m glad he won for two reasons only: John McCain and Sarah Palin, and I deeply resent the fact that the American system forces me to squeeze out a drop of pleasure from something so far removed from my ideals. Obama�s votes came at least as much from people desperate for relief from neoconservative suffocation as from people who genuinely believed in him. It�s a form of extortion -- vote for Obama or you get more of the same. Those are your only choices.

Is there reason to be happy that the insufferably religious George W. is soon to be history? �I believe that Christ died for my sins and I am redeemed through him. That is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily basis.� That was said by someone named Barack Obama. [1] The United States turns out religious fanatics like the Japanese turn out cars. Let�s pray for an end to this.

As I�ve mentioned before, if you�re one of those who would like to believe that Obama has to present center-right foreign policy views to be elected, but once he�s in the White House we can forget that he misled us repeatedly and the true, progressive man of peace and international law and human rights will emerge . . . keep in mind that as a US Senate candidate in 2004 he threatened missile strikes against Iran [2], and winning that election apparently did not put him in touch with his inner peacenik. He�s been threatening Iran ever since.

The world is in terrible shape. I don�t think I have to elucidate on that remark. How nice, how marvelously nice it would be to have an American president who was infused with progressive values and political courage. Just imagine what could be done. Like a quick and complete exit from Iraq. You can paint the picture as well as I can.

With his popularity Obama could get away with almost anything, but he�ll probably continue to play it safe. Or what may be more precise, he�ll continue to be himself, which, apparently, is a committed centrist. He�s not really against the war. Not like you and I are. During Obama�s first four years in the White House, the United States will not leave Iraq. I doubt that he�d allow a complete withdrawal even in a second term. Has he ever unequivocally called the war illegal and immoral? A crime against humanity? Why is he so close to Colin Powell? Does he not know of Powell�s despicable role in the war? And retaining George W. Bush�s Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, a man against whom it would not be difficult to draw up charges of war crimes? Will he also find a place for Rumsfeld? And Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano, a supporter of the war, to run the Homeland Security department? And General James Jones, a former NATO commander [sic], who wants to �win� in Iraq and Afghanistan, and who backed John McCain, as his national security adviser? Jones is on the Board of Directors of the Boeing Corporation and Chevron Oil. Out of what dark corner of Obama�s soul does all this come?

As Noam Chomsky recently pointed out, the election of an indigenous person (Evo Morales) in Bolivia and a progressive person (Jean-Bertrand Aristide) in Haiti were more historic than the election of Barack Obama.

He�s not really against torture either. Not like you and I are. No one will be punished for using or ordering torture. No one will be impeached because of torture. Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, says that prosecuting Bush officials is necessary to set future anti-torture policy. �The only way to prevent this from happening again is to make sure that those who were responsible for the torture program pay the price for it. I don�t see how we regain our moral stature by allowing those who were intimately involved in the torture programs to simply walk off the stage and lead lives where they are not held accountable.� [3]

As president, Obama cannot remain silent and do nothing, otherwise he will inherit the war crimes of Bush and Cheney and become a war criminal himself. Closing the Guantanamo hellhole means nothing at all if the prisoners are simply moved to other torture dungeons. If Obama is truly against torture, why does he not declare that after closing Guantanamo the inmates will be tried in civilian courts in the US or resettled in countries where they clearly face no risk of torture? And simply affirm that his administration will faithfully abide by the 1984 Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, of which the United States is a signatory, and which states: �The term �torture� means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining information or a confession . . . inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or any other person acting in an official capacity.�

The convention affirms that: �No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.�

Instead, Obama has appointed former CIA official John O. Brennan as an adviser on intelligence matters and co-leader of his intelligence transition team. Brennan has called �rendition� -- the kidnap-and-torture program carried out under the Clinton and Bush administrations -- a �vital tool,� and praised the CIA�s interrogation techniques for providing �lifesaving� intelligence. [4]

Obama may prove to be as big a disappointment as Nelson Mandela, who did painfully little to improve the lot of the masses of South Africa while turning the country over to the international forces of globalization. I make this comparison not because both men are black, but because both produced such great expectations in their home country and throughout the world. Mandela was freed from prison on the assumption of the Apartheid leaders that he would become president and pacify the restless black population while ruling as a non-radical, free-market centrist without undue threat to white privilege. It�s perhaps significant that in his autobiography he declines to blame the CIA for his capture in 1962 even though the evidence to support this is compelling. [5] It appears that Barack Obama made a similar impression upon the American power elite who vetted him in many fundraising and other meetings and smoothed the way for his highly unlikely ascendancy from obscure state senator to the presidency in four years. The financial support from the corporate world to sell �Brand Obama� was extraordinary.

Another comparison might be with Tony Blair. The Tories could never have brought in university fees or endless brutal wars, but New Labour did. The Republicans would have had a very difficult time bringing back the draft, but I can see Obama reinstating it, accompanied by a suitable slogan, some variation of �Yes, we can!�

I do hope I�m wrong, about his past and about how he�ll rule as president. I hope I�m very wrong.

Many people are calling for progressives to intensely lobby the Obama administration, to exert pressure to bring out the �good Obama,� force him to commit himself, hold him accountable. The bold reforms of Roosevelt�s New Deal were spurred by widespread labor strikes and other militant actions soon after the honeymoon period was over. At the moment I have nothing better to offer than that. God help us.

Notes

1. Washington Post, August 17, 2008

2. Chicago Tribune, September 25, 2004

3. Associated Press, November 17, 2008

4. New York Times, October 3, 2008

5. Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom (1994) p.278; William Blum, Rogue State, chapter 23, �How the CIA sent Nelson Mandela to prison for 28 years�