The following lead from Monday�s BBC
Radio 4 Today program says it all, well, sort of: �Leaders of the
European Union are meeting to decide what can be done about Russia in the wake
of its invasion of Georgia. The leader of the opposition, David Cameron, went
to Georgia in the aftermath of the conflict -- and says that Russia must be
shown what is unacceptable behaviour and that the UK must continue to stand by
Georgia.�
If one were to rely on the mainstream propaganda machine
anywhere in the West, this statement would perhaps make sense. But when,
instead, one actively seeks out news from beyond the mind-bending media
machine, Cameron�s lie -- like those told by the West�s other leading liars -- is
criminal in its assertion that Russia was the aggressor. A lie because
despite it being known by all concerned, and by NATO leaders in particular,
that Russia was responding to Georgia�s assault on South Ossetia, this
fact is simply omitted by those who seem hell-bent on starting Cold War II, and
who might spark, and even wish to spark, World War III. A criminal lie
in that it is being exploited as yet one more in a long, perpetually growing
list of casus belli to mask the West�s own �unacceptable behaviour,� its own
criminal aggression.
But the Western media always reserves the right to choose
its starting point in history. Those who retain a semblance of individual
thought after seven years of being brainwashed by our brave truth-telling
journalists may recall that all of history collapsed on the morning of
September 11, 2001. The public was, therefore, denied a frank national
discussion concerning U.S. foreign policy actions which may have led to the
attacks. We were similarly denied a frank national discussion concerning the
attacks themselves, who may have perpetrated them, what their motives may have
been, who may have benefitted from the attacks, and what evidence existed which
might point -- beyond a shadow of a doubt -- to the true culprits. Instead,
what could have been a maturation moment for our adolescent republic, led, on
the contrary, to a blatant attempt to keep �we the people� infantile in our
response.
Living then in Massachusetts, I had been on the computer a
couple hours before the terrorist strikes. I had noted with a certain sense of
justice that a Reuters top headline had reported that the family of General
Ren� Schneider had filed a lawsuit on September 10
accusing Henry Kissinger of orchestrating a CIA operation which led to the 1970
assassination of Schneider, then commander-in-chief of the Chilean army. Immediately
after learning of the terrorist attacks, I checked the Reuters headlines again
-- and searched the Reuters news database -- to find that the story was no
longer available.
History had gone down the memory hole, as it so often must
do if monstrous lies are to be maintained.
Therefore, in the case of the Georgian conflict, Georgia�s
aggressive assault on South Ossetia must be wiped out of existence by wiping
the fact -- if it ever reached us -- from our individual and collective memory,
through constant repetition of the lie, both explicit and implicit. We�ve all
heard the explicit. What follows is an example of the implicit, and therefore
perhaps even more insidious, lie.
John Humphrys, the supposedly hard-headed host of the Today
program, set up Monday�s program with a
false dichotomy, both sides of which assume the axiomatic lie of Russian
aggression. Noticing when this false dichotomizing occurs is crucial, as one
can thereby often see that even when a journalist appears to be critical he
might very well be blindsiding us with propaganda: �To sceptical observers
there is something vaguely absurd about the leaders of the European Union being
summoned for an emergency summit meeting to decide what should be done about
Russia in the wake of its invasion of Georgia. Because, they point out, there
is nothing that can be done. If a military response is ruled out -- and it is
-- what is left is sanctions, and how you enforce sanctions against a country
with so much oil and gas that we need them rather more than they need us? Well,
the sceptics may yet be confounded, and, indeed, we�re hearing pretty bellicose
statements coming from the Russians themselves.�
So, the question -- as the BBC presents it, even by a
journalist famous for his tenacity in interviewing politicians -- is �to decide
what should be done about Russia in the wake of its invasion of Georgia,� not
reporting that this very statement is a lie, a lie told by the politicians and
bellowed by their journalists.
The first article I wrote
about the Georgia conflict was in response to the New York Times bellowing
of August 14. It is perhaps right, then, that as an American living in Britain
I point out that journalists on this side of the Atlantic are just as guilty as
their American colleagues of hammering the lies into our noggins so as to form,
or forge, public opinion -- that is, to shape and mold our every thought, our
every consideration, our every conviction -- such that we blindly support our
criminal leaders� criminal actions.
The Today program, I should note, is BBC Radio 4�s
most popular show, reported on its own website to reach over 6 million
listeners each week. Radio 4 itself is a sort of British equivalent of National
Public Radio in the U.S., and is similarly influential in its reach. Its
programming in general, and the Today program in particular, often
includes leading British politicians and other prominent opinion makers as
guests, as in the case of opposition leader David Cameron being interviewed for
today�s program.
In closing, I had hoped when I moved to Britain three years
ago -- for my wife to return to her native home after living in the U.S. with
me for 12 years -- that the world-renowned British press would prove to be more
critical of, less beholden to, the criminal powers that be.
Worse, they are every bit as criminally complicit as their
American counterparts.
And, so, whether I live in the United States or in the
United Kingdom, I shall, regrettably, be living in a lying nation, a nation I
call home.
Copyright � 2008
Sean M. Madden
Sean
M. Madden is an American writer-educator living in East Sussex, England. His
articles have been headlined by a wide range of online media outlets, including
Information Clearing House, United Press International�s
ReligionAndSpirituality.com, Guerrilla News Network, Online Journal, Atlantic
Free Press, Scoop, OpEdNews.com, Thomas Paine�s Corner, Carolyn Baker�s popular
website and the Populist Party of America�s website. Sean also edits and writes
for his iNoodle.com and MindfulLivingGuide.com blogs, and welcomes
correspondence from readers. His email address is sean@inoodle.com.