In my mind you don�t trot around the world creating havoc
and taking peoples� lives to defend your �envied freedoms.� For all the shame
we may rightly accumulate as we send young people to die for our elite�s lust
for power and greed, we don�t have to lie to our enlisted military by mockingly
making them martyrs and heroes when, sadly, they are just being played for
chumps.
Our freedoms and rights need to be protected, but right
here, not in some battlefield or neighborhood somewhere in the Middle East. And
we, Americans, have done a very poor job in fighting domestically to preserve
them.
A couple of mornings ago a thought occurred to me just as I
was reading an article by H. Josef Hebert (AP) on how Bush rhetoric on energy
strayed from the facts. Of course, it wasn�t the headline that caught my eye;
as I see it, Bush rhetoric on most everything has always been light years away
from the facts! But it was the mere thought of this persistent and hopeless
liar, that went off like a flash -- and just like there is a liar ready to
divert any and all facts from a given story, or there is a vice for every
virtue, or an antonym at the opposite end of a synonym, or even that science
fiction idea of parallel universes, why can�t we come up with a set of
anti-freedoms, one that can quantify the degree to which we, Americans, have
become complacently enslaved?
During the six plus years since 9/11 and the passage of the
pseudo-patriotic USAPATRIOT Act, we have slowly become aware of fundamental and
diminutional changes to Americans� constitutional rights under this embryonic
fascist government embodied by the faith-based Bush administration, and a
condescending, peoples� unrepresentative Congress.
Freedoms of association, information and unreasonable
search, as well as rights to liberty, legal representation, and a speedy and
public trial . . . all were confiscated and warehoused -- only borrowed, mind
you -- so as to relieve us from our heavy load of fear and make us all think
we�re assisting in �terror investigation.� Notice that I haven�t included
�freedom of speech� in the list, although the government may prosecute
librarians and other record keepers if they tell anyone that the government
subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation. Actually the freedom
of speech, or expression, had long been under attack almost two generations
before George W. Bush came to the political scene . . . and it was done without
the aid of any specific legislation.
To journalists and commentators, the first freedom that
comes to mind is an easy one: freedom of speech or expression. For those of us
left with the option of writing for our peers and a compressed audience of
progressives, freethinking coreligionists, plus the occasional lost souls who
might be reading us as result of boring curiosity or perhaps cyber-randomness,
we know that freedom of expression is for the most part a cruel hoax. No, it
isn�t that we aren�t free to write (or say) what we please; it�s just that such
writing means very little if it cannot be readily accessed, be available to a
mainstream audience; and people must travel to the underground of verboten
ideas that could never make it through the red-white-and-blue strainer of our
nation�s unfree corporate press.
Soon after World War II, to keep our country uninfected from
the diseases of that malignant world of foreign socio-political ideas, our
freedom of expression was quietly modified without much planning or fanfare to
include patriotic clarifications and purifications via a filtering layer added
to the strainer, one capable of removing all foreign viruses that could
challenge the �American way of life.� These impressions have been very
meticulously carved in the American psyche for almost three generations, and
they render any deviation from capitalism or individualism -- the way we define
them -- as sacrilegious; down and out heresy. The Spanish Inquisition of 1478
had been de facto transplanted to America, in both cases to preserve the faith
(Christianity for the Spaniards, and Americanism for the Americans) and with it
the nation�s unity. In fact, it isn�t just Socialism that Americans have been
taught to hate and also to ridicule, but anything that is part of, or prefixed
by, the word social; or another neutral word, welfare, which for no good reason
has lost its primary meaning of well-being in the US.
Our citizens must be guarded against all those foreign
social remedies that seem to plague much of the industrialized world,
particularly those Northern European countries; just how sick can those
forsaken foreigners be when they exchange an indomitable and survivalist spirit
for a system of welfare from cradle to grave? Obviously Elitist America is
willing to throw overboard half or more of Americans to the seas of the Third
World in its globalization attempt.
Someone told me the other day that the Statue of Liberty
should have Emma Lazarus� poem on that bronze plaque welcoming the tired and
the poor, re-inscribed with the new reality . . ."Welcome to America, Land
of Human Recycling.� Grotesque perhaps, but true! And all because we have
surrendered the free flow of ideas in our nation, our true freedom of
expression, with the captivity of impression of an immutable Americanism unable
to grow and transform.
Like birds in a cage Americans are free to flutter, but
haven�t we been forced into economic and political submission with the control
held by an elite few?
� 2008 Ben
Tanosborn
Ben
Tanosborn, columnist, poet and writer, resides in Vancouver, Washington (USA),
where he is principal of a business consulting firm. Contact him at ben@tanosborn.com.