Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: May 9th, 2008 - 00:42:39


People who don�t need 'People'
By Walter Brasch
Online Journal Contributing Writer


May 9, 2008, 00:12

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

From a pool of about 7 billion, those hard-working geniuses at People magazine have managed to find the hundred most beautiful people in the whole wide world. And -- get ready for the surprise -- almost every one of those beautiful people are rich American celebrities.

For almost two decades, People�s editors believe they have been given the divine right to anoint whom they believe to be the most beautiful people on the planet. The ethnocentric celebrity-fawning People editors are so secure in their self-imposed knowledge that they don�t even tell us what criteria they used to make their determinations. Not even an �editor�s note,� common in most magazines.

For the first few years, People etched their version of reality into our minds by attaching cutesy capsulated biographies to full-page color pictures of the most beautiful. This year, the writing is minimal, the design is almost to the level that a good college journalism or graphics arts student could create and, except for a few full-page and two-page spreads, most pictures are no bigger than thumbnail size.

Leading off the 69-page special section is actress Kate Hudson. Advance stories about her selection appeared in just about every American newspaper and major website, all of which think stories about celebrities are more important than stories about the recession. Also on the list are Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus, Ashton Kutcher, and Norah Jones. The seven-member cast of TV�s �Gossip Girl� made the list. �Onscreen,� People told us, �they are gorgeous, scheming, backstabbing high schoolers.� Just what America needs. More future business executives and politicians.

The first few years, when the magazine editors could find only 50 beautiful people, there was a fairly even split between men and women. This year, about 90 percent are women. Except for six athletes (three men and three women), the rest are actors, singers, dancers, and models.

Three years after the first list came out, People recognized the elderly. Of course, the elderly were Paul Newman, Faye Dunaway, and Barbara Babcock. This year, there�s a special two-page spread deep in the magazine on pages 174�175 for 40 celebrities, 10 in each of the categories of 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s.

People once selected 5-foot-11, size14 model Emme as a beautiful person. It championed her as representative of the �burgeoning large-size modeling industry.� Of course, these vacuous editors have no idea that a size 14 isn�t large -- it is the average size of American women. This year, the only large size models are in full-page ads for Jenny Craig diets and Curvation underwear, which declared, �Style starts with the Side Shaper Underwire bra and shaping panty.�

Teachers, social workers, and medical researchers, no matter how beautiful, didn�t make this year�s cut. But, they shouldn�t worry about it. Neither did Miss America, Miss USA, Miss World, Mr. Universe, or, for that matter, Miss Crustacean, Ocean City, New Jersey�s, salty tribute to hermit crabs, and a spoof of the beauty contest that once inhabited next-door Atlantic City.

People magazine may need people to justify its $254,000 full-page advertising rate. But, people, even with insatiable curiosity about celebrities, really don�t need People.

Walter Brasch is professor of journalism at Bloomsburg University and president of the PennsylvaniaPress Club. His latest book is Sinking the Ship of State: The Presidency of George W. Bush, You may contact Brasch at brasch@bloomu.edu or through his website at: www.walterbrasch.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Why Myanmar should fear us
Anglo-American ascendancy lost in unnecessary wars
Israel�s 60 years of nuclear proliferation
Our cultural heritage
Sami Al Haj in Guantanamo
The problem with America
Spoiled Americans fail the green test
Another American war -- look out, earth
One Bolivia, white and wealthy
People who don�t need 'People'
The winds of Fascism blowing across Europe
Bloomberg privatizing Union Square?
In Iraq, US is digging in for the long haul
Executive or imperial branch?
Cover-ups insult our intelligence
Captivity of impression, not freedom of expression
Ashamed to be American
AOL subscribers: You can no longer receive e-mails containing the word "Blogspot"
Cherie Blair in Bangladesh
Popcorn and champagne: The Trial of Tareq Aziz