What happened to the Flower Power of the '60s and '70s? Did
we use it all up? Drain our reserves already? Or have we given up on our
ability to make a difference? And while burning bras and free love may have not
done a lot toward ending the war, at least large groups of people were getting
together and believing that they could make a difference.
What happened to that drive in America to do the right
thing, and not just when election time, or some national disaster, rolls
around? I think it�s quite simple. We have lost our faith in our leaders and
their desire to listen and respond to our needs. Oh, and we now have �better
things� to do.
How did we lose our faith? I think it had a little something
to do with money. According to opensecrets.org,
George W. Bush raised $360 million for his 2004 campaign, and spent $306
million, which was $167 million more than he spent in 2002. John Kerry raised
$317 million and spent over $240 million. That�s over half a billion dollars
just for one political office, and that is just what was released publicly.
Imagine how many mouths could have been fed with just one attack ad, let alone
the 40 we see each day until not so Super Tuesday. And not only is it a waste
of money, it also shows that if you want to run, you�d better start with the
bank account. It�s very difficult to believe that our democracy is really
democratic, but instead our elections line up pretty well with our capitalist
ideals. It appears he (or she) who spends the most, wins.
And then, once they are elected, how often do they do any of
the things they said they would do? With our last election in 2006, the
Democrats promised us change (everybody promises change) and an end to the war.
(They are still promising that two years later, how do you think that went?)
And while Nancy Pelosi�s first 100 hours may not have gone the way the
Democrats planned (that�s legislative hours mind you, as described by Pelosi
spokesman Brendan Daly as �when the House convenes, after the one-minutes and
before the special orders�� I thought they would be pulling a few
all-nighters:), at least they made an effort to follow the calls of the people
who elected them. They tried to create a timetable for troop withdrawal and put
a cap on war spending, two things they told us they would do if we voted for
them. And we all saw what our votes got us, more of the same. Backpedaling,
vacations, pork, and filibusters, and as usual, no real change.
So, we stop believing that our votes matter, and until we
can end our two-party system we will keep fighting for our team, and not for
the American people. I think it�s probably a safe argument to say that our
politicians spend more time getting elected and reelected, than they do
actually serving their constituents. It seems every time I watch a vote on
C-SPAN, half of my representatives aren�t even there. I wish my boss was this
understanding. Isn�t that what we pay them for, to represent us? Not themselves
or their political party at a fundraiser, but to be an experienced stand-in for
our voice? If they don�t show, will anyone hear us?
Now to the apathy. Ben Franklin said, �Democracy is two
wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed
lamb contesting the vote.� We still have the two wolves, but the lambs have
found something better to do -- Cable TV. It used to be, if the president was
giving a speech, you had to watch it, or read a book, God forbid. It would be
on every channel. I thought about this the other night as I was channel surfing
and happened upon live coverage of Obama and Hilary as they battled in my home
state of Ohio. I flipped right past it, and kept going, trying to find a good
rerun to watch, instead. After a few minutes of MacGyver, I remembered it was my civic duty to
watch those speeches (even if they didn�t write them, this is who I�m electing
to speak for me and they can�t speak for themselves?).
So I flipped back and listened to them both promise me
change and tell why they would do it better, and I remembered why I stopped
listening to these speeches. They make a lot of promises, but don�t tell you
how they�re going to do any of it. Again, this is old hat, but what�s changing?
I don�t have to watch it! So I flipped over to the main channels; we�ve got Deal
or No Deal, some lie detector show (I�d love to get the candidates on
that one!), some reality challenge show -- nothing for me, thanks. Well, how
about a little surfing, on the web of course, this new generation doesn�t have
to go outside (even Reggie Bush tells kids in commercials to log on to the
Internet to learn how to play). So, I surfed the web, checked my mail, and when
that got tiresome, I turned on my Playstation. There went the night. Then I
dragged myself to work in the morning so I could come home and repeat the
process.
Are all of these new distractions just the products of a
growing global economy, as The Beatles put it, �It�s getting better all the
time (couldn�t get any worse)?� Or is this a highly crafted plan to divert our
attention from what really matters? As our capitalist system keeps unveiling
the new must have products, we find more and more reasons not to pay attention,
and we get more and more reasons not to fight back. All of these luxuries
become necessities in our lives, and we begin to think we can�t live without
them. That�s when we become so trapped in our �almost good enough� lifestyle
that we don�t want to risk losing any of it for a change we don�t believe will
come anyway. I don�t think most of us believe in change anymore, and as long as
our capitalist system keeps us chasing after the next great product that will
revolutionize our lives, (and fearing we could lose it all with just one roll
of the dice), no real revolution will happen.
So, how do you stop a people from revolting? Take a lesson
from the great United States. You have to give them the belief that things are
getting better, and that they have a hand in it. You have to show them
repeatedly on the news and in your films (you will generally own both) how bad
it could be if they moved somewhere else. You have to make them believe that
they are just a few steps away from achieving their greatest dreams, and that
all they have to do is keep on track, go to work, pay their bills, and
eventually they will climb out of that hole. And you have to make them live in
fear that it all could be taken away in an instant. I have watched speeches by
the top candidates (and Nader, but a vote for a third party is a lost vote,
right?) and they all sell it well, but we know it�s mostly sweet talk and
slander, and we just don�t believe what they (or their speech writers) have to
say anymore. Instead we think, �Eh, what else is on?�
Tim
Buchholz is an activist and freelance writer based in Ohio.