After reviewing the mainstream media reports on the political response to the National Intelligence Estimate, it seems clear to me that the leaders of the 'Axis of Good' are bent on betting all their stakes on Iran. Although the summary of the findings of the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies reveals that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003 and has shown no signs of restarting it, President Bush is calling it a "warning signal" instead of extending a formal apology.

In the year 2000, Professor Noam Chomsky spoke of the reasons for hostility towards Iran; "Until 1979 the U.S. system for controlling the Middle East was based on Iran, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan . . . Actually the hostility to Iran is because it pulled out of the system and when it is willing to pull back into the system it will become a non-terrorist state again."

In 2006, Seymour M. Hersh, in an article revealing plans by the White House to attack Iran, quoted a high-ranking diplomat in Vienna who told him "the real issue is who is going to control the Middle East and its oil in the next 10 years.� Donald Rumsfeld, then U.S. defense secretary, dismissed the article as a trip to "fantasyland."

However, just tracking some of the statements made by "world leaders" in regards to Iran over the last few years reveals that a trip to "fantasyland" is exactly where we are heading. The "warning signals" have been flashing long enough, and the public should react and demand responsibility from our democratically elected governments.

In February 2005, in his State Of The Union Address, President Bush singled out Iran as "the world's primary state sponsor of terror -- pursuing nuclear weapons."

In 2006, the United Nations Security Council acted unanimously to tighten sanctions on Iran, in response to the country�s uranium-enrichment activities, expressing doubts about the country�s nuclear program being �exclusively for peaceful purposes.�

In October of 2007, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Iran of "lying" about the aim of its nuclear program, saying there's no doubt Tehran wants the capability to produce nuclear weapons and has deceived the U.N.'s atomic watchdog about its intentions.

In August of 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy addressing France's ambassadorial corps, praised diplomatic initiatives by Western powers pushing for tougher sanctions on Iran, as the approach "that can enable us to avoid being faced with an alternative that I call catastrophic: an Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran."

One would have expected that after the release of NIE's report last week, the war pushing rhetoric would have been silenced and that "global leaders" would redirect the media's spotlight towards other events. However, the mainstream media is still being used to divulge propaganda about the eminent threat of a nuclear Iran. In fact, the NIE has increased the beat of aggression. Following the report of the findings, Condoleezza Rice said; "I continue to see Iran as a dangerous power in international politics". President Bush's U.N. ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, added that Iran had undertaken an "assertive pursuit of regional hegemony" promoting "its ideology and theocratic state as models to be exported or imposed on others," and emphasized that Iran would require "a sustained U.S. military presence in the gulf region."

The aggression is further emphasized by US Defence Secretary Robert Gates who, speaking at a weekend security conference in Bahrain, said that Iran may secretly have resumed efforts to build a nuclear weapon. A situation which he suggests, requires intensified international pressure on Tehran, together with recommendations to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states to develop a joint air and missile shield to ward off future threats.

Throughout this poker diplomacy, the allies have remained firmly behind the U.S on its bluff on Iran; "The world is right to insist by sanctions that Iran comes back into line," Briitish Prime Minister Gordon Brown told a parliamentary committee. And EU foreign ministers have added that the council of member states "reiterates its full support to the work in the U.N. Security Council to adopt further measures."

This aggressive push by "world leaders" suggests that everywhere you turn the U.S and its allies are promoting a policy aimed at fomenting instability and chaos. Indifferent to the devastating consequences of this "fantasyland," Western government officials are gambling the fate of humanity in hope of retaining control of strategic locations necessary for the control of global trade. Concerned global citizens should unite to do something about this, because, according to a British official working closely with the UN, Iran is already a country whose people are victims of sanctions that "are having a deeply negative effect on the Iranian economy and there is the prospect of more to come."