While everyone is focusing on the question of sending more
troops in Iraq, there still exist some congressional laws and sections of the
U.S. Constitution that the Bush administration has not altered, for example the
War Powers Resolution and Article I, section 8, of the Constitution.
The Constitution states that only Congress has the power to
declare war. However, since World War II, the United States has been involved
in many major conflicts without resorting to a war declaration. This led to
some ambiguity over the extent to which the president is allowed to conduct
military action under his constitutional authority as commander in chief of the
armed forces, without prior congressional approval.
In Vietnam, this question was addressed through the Gulf of
Tonkin Resolution, which was a 1964 resolution issued by Congress giving
President Lyndon B. Johnson approval, without a formal declaration of war, �to
take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force, to assist any member
or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty requesting
assistance in defense of its freedom.� Both Johnson and his successor, Richard
Nixon used the Resolution as a justification for escalated involvement in
Indochina.
In an attempt to clarify the issue further, Congress passed
the War Powers Act in 1973. As stated in Section 2(a) of the act, it was passed
to insure that �the collective
judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction
of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where
imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances,
and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.�
While some
have questioned the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, it is very precise
in the conditions it sets out for military deployments. Section 5 (b) puts a
time limit of no longer than 90 days for the use of United States Armed Forces
in a foreign nation without a declaration of war or a joint resolution of
Congress otherwise authorizing the use of force.
On the
question as to who has ultimate say so, Section 5(c) of the War Power
Resolution makes this crystal clear, stating, �Notwithstanding subsection (b),
at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside
the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a
declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be
removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.�
In other words, Congress can mandate the removal of troops at anytime, if there
has not been a formal declaration of war.
The
required formal resolution to allow the use of Armed Forces to go into Iraq was
Public Law 107-243, passed by the 107th Congress on Oct. 16, 2002. The
resolution accused Iraq of harboring people responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001,
attacks. Congress also concluded that �Iraq�s continuing weapons of mass
destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international
peace and security,� and declared Iraq to be in �material and unacceptable
breach of its international obligations� and urged the president �to take
appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of
the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international
obligations.�
In short,
the authorization of force was based on the weapons of mass destruction theory,
which was proven to be a lie based on old intelligence and Iraqi defectors. Even
Bush has admitted this. No retraction of the resolution has been made; neither
has an apology ever been issued by Congress or the Bush administration on
behalf of the American people to the United Nations or Iraq.
The Iraq
resolution invoked the War Powers Clause, therefore requiring the President of
the United States to gain congressional approval for all troop deployment, as
stated in Section 2(b) of the War Powers Act, which points to the Necessary and
Proper Clause of the Constitution as the basis for legislation on the war
powers. It provides that �Under Article I, section 8, of the Constitution it is
specifically provided that Congress shall have the power to make all laws
necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but
also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the
United States.�
Once the
justification for the Iraq resolution was found to be inaccurate and
unsubstantiated, a new resolution for the immediate removal of our troops
should have been issued by Congress, and a congressional hearing and
investigation for gross misconduct and even possible criminal charges against
Rumsfeld, Powell, Cheney and Bush himself should have been started.
The framers
of the Constitution made clear that the United States Congress has the ultimate
say so, and the War Powers Act merely reinforces that authority.
Why are we
as Americans not marching up to Washington and demanding the immediate
impeachment of the whole Bush administration?
Claudia
Nelson is an independant news journalist and photographer
currently residing in Argentina.