Even with the media support required to sustain hate in
plain sight, today�s background chatter suggests that those worried about U.S.
national security are at work in the shadows to counter the influence of the
If so, that is good news -- for the United States.
When Israeli-American writer Jeff Goldberg appeared again in
the news, you knew psy-ops were underway. In March 2002, Goldberg published
in The New Yorker a lengthy story alleging an alliance between the
religious jihadists of Al Qaeda and the secular Baathists of Iraq.
Though a nonsensical premise, his account made such an
alliance appear plausible to a public lacking in knowledge of the Middle East.
Goldberg�s storyline made it easier for Saddam Hussein to be portrayed as both
an Evil Doer and a threat to the U.S.
Goldberg�s collaborator was James Woolsey, a former Director
of the CIA and an avid Zionist. Woolsey assured us that Iraqi intelligence
officials met in Prague with Al Qaeda. By association, his stature in
intelligence lent credibility to phony intelligence fixed around an Israeli
Goldberg reemerged in July to promote Evil Doer status for
Iran. Writing in the July 22nd issue of The Atlantic, he argued the
Israeli case for bombing Iran and urged that the U.S. again join the fray. No
one in mainstream media mentioned his earlier manipulation.
Based on the consistency of his �journalism,� it came as no
surprise to see Goldberg reemerge just in time for the ninth anniversary of
911. Aided by an array of false intelligence reported by a complicit media,
that murderous provocation helped persuade the U.S. to invade Iraq to remove
Evil Doer Saddam Hussein.
That March 2003 agenda was first promoted in 1996 in A
Clean Break, a strategy paper
written for Benjamin Netanyahu by an Israeli-American team led by Richard
Perle. This Jewish-Zionist operative re-emerged in July 2001 to chair the
Pentagon�s Defense Policy Board where he was joined by Woolsey and others
supportive of this Israeli agenda.
Advancing the narrative
Fast-forward to September 2010 and we find Goldberg back at
work promoting his interview with Fidel Castro. Emerging fact patterns suggest
it came as no surprise to our national security apparatus that the theme of
this latest well-timed Goldberg article was the Cuban leader�s concern that
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is �anti-Semitic.�
The timing of this report came as a surprise to those aware
that Castro has long been critical of Israel�s treatment of the Palestinians.
Goldberg reports he was �summoned� to Havana to discuss
Castro�s fears of a global nuclear war. After conceding in the interview that
the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis �wasn�t worth it,� Castro turned to a theme of
topical importance to Tel Aviv, insisting that the Iranian government must
understand that Jews �were expelled from their land, persecuted and mistreated
all over the world.�
Knowing Cuba�s pre-revolution alliance with Meyer Lansky and
other kingpins in Jewish organized crime, one must wonder if this �journalist�
was dispatched to commence negotiations for gambling concessions as a means to
fill the Castro government�s depleted coffers.
The recent relaxation of restrictions on travel to Cuba may
signal a pending return to Cuba�s �glory days� as a nearby haven for organized
Castro�s well-timed comments about persecuted Jews may have
been a signal that Cuba is again open for business -- any business. At the very
least, his comments were like a healing balm to nationalist Zionist settlers
who have plans to construct another 19,000 home in the West Bank.
So much for those who seek to quell Israel�s long-running
land dispute with the Palestinians in order to keep peace talks on track.
Within two days of the release of the Goldberg interview,
vandals in Sacramento, California used a swastika to deface an image of Israeli
basketball star Omri Casspi. The identity of the vandals has not been
This much has been confirmed: timing is everything when
seeking to sustain a storyline. Casting Castro as pro-Israeli was a stroke of
Here�s where it starts of get interesting as Americans wake
up to find themselves unwitting combatants in the first real Information Age
War. When waging modern-day warfare in the shared field of consciousness, media
is routinely deployed to displace facts with false beliefs.
Thus the need for substantial and sustained influence in
that domain by those determined to shape the political narrative. No one does
that better than those who induced the world�s greatest super power to wage a
war on their behalf.
Recent developments suggest that the dynamics may be
shifting in the �field� where political narratives are advanced and where
today�s wars are either won or lost. That field is the shared field of
consciousness where consensus beliefs are created and sustained.
In news reported from the Middle East on September 10, Washington
took a surprising stance in support of Iranian claims that Tehran was not
building a new uranium enrichment facility. That statement came after an
Iranian dissident group, in a well-timed release, charged that Iran had a new
secret nuclear site 120 kilometers north of Tehran.
That disclaimer preempted a lead editorial in The New
York Times published in the U.S. later that same day -- just before the
ninth anniversary of 911. That editorial sought to give credence to a report
that had already been dismissed as not credible.
Was this an example of U.S. national security attempting to
reclaim the narrative? Does this signal a new aggressiveness by the U.S. in
waging field-based warfare against those whose successful deceptions led us to
war in the Middle East?
Two days prior, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a
speech stating �there may not be another chance� for Mideast peace. That
statement came the same day that a senior Palestinian negotiator confirmed they
would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Clinton said nothing.
Could these developments signal a crack in the Zionist
agenda that has shaped U.S. foreign policy for more than six decades? Are
Zionists losing their chokehold on the White House?
If so, will the Israel lobby again rally Congress to
Will we see another �unbreakable bond� resolution urging
that U.S. interests continue to take second place to Tel Aviv�s agenda for the
Will the national security interests of the U.S. prevail or
will Zionist goals again triumph?
Timing is everything
While these events were unfolding, The New York Times
continued to stoke the controversy surrounding �International Burn A Koran
The nation�s �newspaper of record� conceded that this
well-timed controversy began with local coverage by The Gainesville Sun
(owned by The New York Times) when pastor Terry Jones posted a sign
outside his small church that read �Islam is of the devil.�
By August 26th, The Times was prepared to
publish a major article on Jones and the anti-Islam views of his 50-member
congregation. By September 9th, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr
Mottaki was prepared to say with confidence that Zionists were responsible for
the Jones plan to burn a Koran on 911.
In a fortuitous case of timing, recordings played in a
federal courtroom on September 8th showed how a government informer
induced a 2009 synagogue bomb plot in New York. The recordings made it clear
that those on trial as �homegrown terrorists bent on jihad� were not even
modestly well versed in Islam. To make a plausible case for later use in the
courtroom, the informer prompted comments consistent with the hate-mongering
motivation at the heart of the prosecution�s case.
Do these small chinks in the Zionist armor suggest that
Israeli dominance of U.S. foreign policy may be drawing to a close?
Next: A look at the recurring use of pliable and reliable
assets to advance a narrative.
Gates is author of Guilt By Association,
Democracy at Risk and The Ownership
Solution. See www.criminalstate.com.