According to the US State Department, there are
approximately a dozen separate anti-Semitic beliefs, the worst of which is the
claim that wealthy Jewish-Americans economically control the government, the
media, international business or finance.
The other most serious intolerable anti-Semitic claim is
that the brutal Israeli repression of the Palestinians is comparable to the
fascist tactics that were employed by the Nazis against another Semitic people
If anti-Semitism is the spreading of lies about Semitic
peoples, and both of these "canards" are proven to be true, then it
is the government that is spreading the lies about its ally Israel.
If there is no truth to the charge that Israel is driving
America to war against Iran (just as it drove our power-mad leaders to destroy
Iraq), then why is it that the craziest American ideas for committing acts of
war against Iran (embargoes, blockades and denying Iran the use of its own
airspace) all originate in Israel? If most Americans are overwhelmingly against
expanding the current limited wars into a regional conflagration, then what
explains the bipartisanship in Congress for these small-scale military steps
which are clearly intended to cause a major escalation with Iran?
The American majority knows that opening a new war front in
Iran would be a major defeat for American forces, having three intolerable
consequences: forcing a return of the draft, the devastation of what is left of
the American economy and the use of nuclear weapons against civilian
populations. The Israeli majority knows this as well, and they are perfectly
willing to force their American ally into paying this price for them. Some ally!
If American politicians are not subservient to Israeli
interests through the lobby group AIPAC and the financial largesse which they
dispense, then how do you explain congressional pursuit of a global war that is
desired only by the small vocal Jewish-American minority and their
Christian-Zionist supporters (which cannot benefit any nation other than
Israel), even though world war is the direct opposite of the clearly expressed
will of the majority?
Why have these same politicians supported every Israeli
effort to deny the most basic human rights to Palestinians and many other
Arabs? Why has Congress supported the suppression of testimony about these
victims of Israeli aggression and the violation of countless international laws
against the ethnic cleansing committed by Israeli troops while colonizing
Palestinian land? Why is there bipartisan support for empowering Israel's
attempts to act as vigilante enforcer of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty,
even though Israel continues to spurn international inspections of its Dimona
facility, where Mordechai Vanunu took his infamous secret photos which proved
that Israel has illegally violated every international atomic treaty in
secretly building hundreds of nuclear weapons?
No other nation in the world can flaunt international law
and receive undiminished US support for its continued lawbreaking and the
brutal, merciless, fascist-like repression of a victim population the way
Israel does. Why does the purported international champion of human rights and the
alleged defender of the weak support the criminal abuse of a helpless minority
in Palestine and in no other nation?
What is the root of this sentiment, that America must
insulate Israel from the consequences of its own actions, even if it is fatal
to our republic? Why does this bipartisan commitment to bring war upon the
United States permeate both chambers of Congress, where it is echoed by
Democrats and Republicans alike? Conspiring with agents of a foreign power to
bring war upon the United States matches two of the three definitions of
treason given by Dictionary.com:
violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
Are we witnessing a perverse Congress that has succumbed to
blackmail, or have they merely sold America out for the sake of power and
wealth? It does not matter whether Bush and Co. are puppets or parrots for the
powerful Jewish-American interests who are driving the war on terror, the fact remains that in this war,
Israeli government officials are pulling the strings. Ehud Olmert may as well
be calling in the American air strikes himself, as we target the countries
which they have named for elimination in the "Clean Break" document,
which is nothing more than an updated Zionist version of "Mein
American military forces are carrying-out the Zionist
"blitzkrieg" against Israel's Arab neighbors, decimating any military
forces which could resist the planned Israeli aggression, turning entire
nations into refugee populations, conducting a genocidal war of ethnic
cleansing on behalf of "God's Chosen People." If modern Israelis were
indeed "the Chosen," then there would be no conflict there now, as
well as no "Diaspora," since all real Jews would be drawn irresistibly
back to the Holy Land. But the Zionist imposters who are waging war against the
world are watching their stolen dream collapse around them, as worries about
Israeli militancy, water shortages and the comforts of assimilation bring about
a negative growth rate, where more people leave Israel than "return"
The criminal regime in Tel Aviv is doing everything it can
to expand America's terror war, which is seen as Israel's sole existential
hope. Mossad agents are working overtime to avoid the inevitable collapse of
the racist Zionist vision, as they try every conceivable deception to activate
some version of its "Samson option," bringing the rest of the world
down around itself and sacrificing the US to empower itself.
Bush, Cheney and nearly the entire Congress are committed to
ending the Iranian regime, whatever the costs, before the new president takes
office. On June 4, Bush issued a memo
to the secretary of state: "I hereby determine that it is necessary, in
order to protect the national security interests of the United States, to
suspend for a period of six months . . . the process of moving our embassy to
Moving our embassy would be placing our seal of approval
upon an Israeli annexation of Islam's second most holy city, after Mecca. This
means that Bush is delaying the implementation of one of the most controversial
decisions that any US president has ever made, until after the November 4
United States presidential election, to protect the "national security
interests of the United States" (knowing what the effects upon the entire
Muslim world will be). Some have interpreted this as Bush's way of bolstering
McCain, who also wants to move our embassy, by avoiding compounding Israeli
complications for him. This may be part of his motivation for the delay, but
knowing the warped reasoning of the current administration, I take this to mean
that the drastic actions which Bush plans to take on Israel's behalf at that
time will dwarf present concerns about angry Muslim reactions to an embassy
Bush's embassy move memo was released while Olmert was
meeting with him, trying to persuade him to substitute Israel's own
intelligence estimate on Iran's nuclear program for the official US
National Intelligence Estimate, which is a product of 16 American agencies. Olmert was in town to attend the AIPAC conference,
where he told the audience point blank, why America must wipe Iran from the
face of the earth, in order to satisfy Israeli designs for dominating the
Middle East: "Iran's fingerprints are evident in almost every
terrorist organization across the Middle East, from Hamas and Islamic Jihad in
the Gaza Strip to Hizballah in Lebanon . . . [equating the three Islamic
resistance groups that oppose Israeli hegemony as "almost every
"The Iranian threat must be stopped by all possible
means. International economic and political sanctions on Iran, as crucial as
they may be, are only an initial step, and must be dramatically increased . . .
urgent need for more drastic and robust measures.
"Sanctions can be imposed on the export of gasoline to
Iran . . . [following his previous calls for a naval blockade and declaring
Iranian and Syrian air space as "no fly zones"] . . . Israel will not
tolerate the possibility of a nuclear Iran."
Christian Americans must ask themselves, "If America
does not neutralize Iran at Israel's command, then is America failing God, or
is it merely refusing to commit another criminal act for a criminal
Does America even have a choice in the matter anymore?
contact Peter Chambelin, click here.