If you�re
interested in knowing who was behind the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, 42 years ago today in Dallas, Texas, think of the CIA whose boss,
Allan Dulles, Elite Emeritus, John fired for coming up with and engineering the
�Bay of Pigs� incident. Also, JFK wasn't high on Army Intelligence's list,
because he wanted to keep our involvement in Vietnam to a minimum, and even
pull out if possible.
It�s no surprise
that soon after JFK�s assassination, his successor, President Lyndon B.
Jphnson, used the faked �Gulf of Tonkin Incident,� to carpet bomb Vietnam, and
we were off and running into the valley of death, which left 58,000 Americans
dead and 2 million dead Vietnamese.
This is old news,
but then so am I: at 67, old enough to remember it day by day, and having to
dodge the draft to keep from having to fight in that needless war. Old enough
to remember I was teaching school in Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, the day John F.
Kennedy was shot.
There was early
release from school that Tuesday, because everyone was freaked, including the
young English teacher, Mr. Mazza, who rode home on the bus with his students
and could see the panic that flashed in their eyes like those multiple gunshots
from some six to eight different shooters from three different directions,
that�s right, not one lone gunman, with a bolt-action World War II Italian Army
rifle. Let�s form a thumbnail outline of some history.
The Truth Is in the Book and in the Wounds
Let�s start with a
landmark book, The Great Zapruder Film
Hoax, edited my McKnight Professor James Fetzer of the University of
Minnesota at Duluth. For the unanointed, the Zapruder film is that 27 seconds
of celluloid shot by bystander Abraham Zapruder, a Dallas dress manufacturer,
as he stood on a pedestal at the Grassy Knoll as Kennedy rolled by and was
shot. It is the only film record we have of the shooting. It was subsequently
manipulated frame by frame by the CIA for purposes of obfuscation. There are at
least four versions of the film on DVD and VHS floating around.
On page xiii of the
Prologue of Fetzer�s The Great Zapruder
Film Hoax, we learn that the National Photographic Interpretation Center
(NPIC), run by the CIA ,was in possession of an original copy of the film. This
may have been #0184, the one sold to Texas oilman, sometimes CIA man, H. L.
Hunt, who might have had it taken to Rochester as a negative and turned into a
positive and sent it to NPIC. In any case, CIA personnel saw the original on
the very night of the assassination.
One CIA person in
particular . . ."Homer McMahon, who was in charge of the color photo
section for the NPIC at the time, substantiated that he was brought a home
movie of the assassination by Secret Service Agent William Smith. McMahon had
been instructed to review the film and prepare a briefing board displaying the
impacts of bullets on bodies for an unspecified government official. McMahon
reported that, after 10 or more viewings of the film, it was his opinion that
President Kennedy was shot six to eight
times from at least three directions, which, of course, is even more
strikingly at variance with what can be observed on the film today.�
Fetzer also reports
that Admiral George Burkley, the president�s personal physician, was with the
body in Dallas, and accompanied it on the flight back, and was present during
the autopsy in Bethesda.
According to his
death certificate, the bullet that caused President Kennedy�s back wound did
not exit through his throat. And did not pierce Governor Connally�s right back
and chest, and exit at the right nipple, shatter his wrist, and lodge in his
thigh, then fall out later on a gurney at Parkland. According to the good
doctor, the back wound appeared at about the level of JFK�s third thoracic vertebra,
which is too low to have been the entry location to exit from the president�s
throat at the level of his tie knot, unless Oswald was shooting from inside the
trunk. Burkley reported the back wound bullet entered at about a 45 degree to
60-degree angle downward, was not found in the body, and showed no exit wound.
Burkley also noted
a massive (heel-size) wound in the right rear of Kennedy�s head (not at the
cowlick top of his head). The bullet from this wound exited the right side of
the skull, probably killing the president.
Yet Commander Hume,
the titular head of operations at the Bethesda Naval Medical Center, with the
help of CIA and Secret Service men, insisted the first bullet�s path did line
up with the so-called throat exit wound. On the other hand, a diagram prepared
by FBI special agent James W. Silbert, who witnessed the autopsy at Bethesda,
supported Burkley�s observations. His illustration can be found in Noel
Twyman�s Bloody Treason, 1997, (p.
100). It shows the paradox Dr. Burkley noted: that the wound, fired from a
position behind the body, proceeded at somewhere between a 45 and 60 degree
angle and did not exit the body.
Silbert, with
another agent, Francis X. O Neill, submitted a report of their observations at
the time . . ."Medical examination of the president�s body revealed that
one of the bullets had entered just below his shoulder to the right of the
spinal column at an angle of 45 to 60 degrees downward, that there was no point
of exit, and that the bullet was not in the body.�
This bullet had
worked its way out of JFK�s back during cardiac massage at Parkland Hospital. This
information is found both in Mark Lane�s Rush
to Judgment 1966, Appendix IV, and Robert Groden�s The Killing of the President (199, pp.78-79). The angle was determined
by a physician at Parkland using his finger to probe the wound. The bullet was
not in the body, nor did it exit upon firing. Also, at the level of the third
vertebrae, the bullet would have run into other thoracic bones if it had gone
through the body. This shoots the hell out of the �magic bullet� theory.
What is also known
is that a member of the Warren Commission�s Assassinations Records Review
Board, one Gerald Ford (name sound familiar?) had the description of the back
wound changed from Kennedy�s �uppermost back� to the �back of his neck.� This
was discovered and noted in the New York
Times, July 3, 1997, at which
time Ford said his change �was intended to clarify meaning, not alter history.�
I�ll bet.
Also, the House
Select Committee on Assassinations years later moved the entry point of the
head wound up four inches from the lower rear of the head to the cowlick region
of the skull. This most likely to justify how the heel-size wound, originally
drawn on the back right side of the head, had been extended upwards and
forwards to become a footprint-size skull wound at Bethesda Naval Hospital in
1963.
Again from Hoax, page 9: in May 1992, a private investigator named Joe West interviewed
Thomas Robinson, who had prepared Kennedy�s body for the funeral. West noted an
additional wound and other interesting events that Robinson described:
�A large gaping
hole in back of the head . . . Patched by stretching piece of rubber over it.
Think skull full of Plaster of Paris.
"Small wound in right temple, crescent shape, flapped down (3�)
"(Approx 2) small shrapnel wounds in face . . . packed with wax.
"Wound in back (5 to 6 inches) below shoulder.
"Adrenal gland and brain removed.
"Other organs removed and then put back.
"No swelling or discoloration to face.
"Dr. Berkley (family Physician) came in to ask . . ."How much
longer?" He was told (Funeral Director) �Take your time.� Is in favor of
Examining Body . . . to settle once . . . for all. �Good Pathologists would
know exactly��
The Wound to the Face
The small wound to
the face was from a gunshot that shattered through the windshield and entered
Kennedy�s right temple. The shrapnel wounds were probably windshield glass
according to Dr. David W. Mantik, who also questioned the authenticity of the
x-rays. The lack of discoloration in the face indicates instant death. Note
that West notes that Robinson observed the brain missing and the cavity
probably stuffed with Plaster of Paris. It was later replaced with another
brain. Ghoulish but true.
Additionally, Dr.
Malcolm Perry, who performed a tracheostomy to save the president�s life,
described the wound to the throat as an entry wound three times during a press
conference held at Parkland, beginning at 3:16 PM. His remarks were broadcast
over radio and television, the transcript published in the New York Times, November 23, 1963.
If the throat wound
was an entry wound, if the back wound bullet did not exit the body, it follows
that Connally�s wounds must have been caused by separate shots from separate
places -- and obviously not by a sole assassin. It seems that it�s not the
conspiracy theorists who are fantasizing but the government, which is mired in
an account produced solely for cover-up.
And so at 1:30 PM
on that fateful day, while I was busy telling my English students in
Bensonhurst that reading could open new worlds to them, Acting Press Secretary
Malcolm Kilduff announced that the president was dead. He said that it had been
�a simple matter of a bullet right through the head,� as he pointed to his
right temple, Fetzer, p. 16, figure 23.
He attributed this finding to Admiral George G. Burkley, the president�s
personal physician.
When information of
JFK�s four wounds from different angles began to sink into the public and
reporters� minds, questions began to arise how one person could do all this? It
was then that the simple notion of reversing trajectories of the neck and
temple wounds, and altering the location of the back and head wounds, became
necessary. Alas, the whitewash was born, albeit with a little help from the
Warren Commission�s friends, Arlen Specter, Gerald Ford, Allan Dulles, a few
doctors, et al. And speaking of doctors let me add this piece from page xiii of
the Prologue from Hoax . . .
�Charles Crenshaw,
M.D., was a resident at Parkland Hospital when JFK was brought into Trauma Room
#1. He was present during the vain effort to revive the moribund president and
was the last physician to observe the body before it was prepared for
transportation to Bethesda Naval Hospital, including closing the eyes of the
deceased . . .
Crenshaw also drew
the massive blow-out to the back of the head as he observed it at Parkland,
which bears striking similarity to a similar diagram approved by another
physician who was present at the time, Robert McClelland, M.D., as well as
reports by more than 40 eyewitnesses who described a similar wound at the
back/right of the head. Crenshaw�s original diagrams can be found in Assassination Science (1998, pp.
414-415). The McClelland diagram may be found in Murder in Dealey Plaza (200, p. 180 . . . )� The Parkland drawings
are the original heel-size shots to the lower right of the head, Hoax, p. 16, figure 23.
I could go on but
space doesn�t permit. But go to Fetzer and all the great writers that know
JFK�s death was a conspiracy of the CIA, hateful Hoover�s FBI and the mob with
which JFK�s father Joe had dealings that got him in trouble. And so, he
promised the fealty of his sons John and Bobby to then Capo de Capos, Chicago's
Sam Giancana. In return, if the mob could beat the drum and get the union vote
out in Illinois, which they did, and help win the election by a slender margin,
they would get their �man in the White House.� Instead they got John and
Bobby�s unremitting scorn and wrath, a revival of the McClellan Committee's
Crusade against organized crime, which drove Giancana to the top of America�s
Most Wanted list. What�s more, Bobby had New Orleans Capo Santo Trafficante
extradited to Guatemala. And so, they all had a hand in getting even, plus one
. . .
Behind It All, Some Elite Giving the Order
As Fletcher Prouty
described on page 345 of JFK- The CIA,
Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate Kennedy . . .
�US-TEC had been created in 1972, under President Nixon by the business
interests of the former Dartmouth Conference that had been sponsored by
Rockefeller interests. For the most part US-TEC membership is drawn from the
list of FORTUNE 500 companies in America, and from their counterparts in
Russia. US-TEC maintains regular offices in Moscow and New York and publishes
regularly a 'Forbes-style' US-TEC Journal.
�As we look back at
this Trade Show, at the 'Evil Empire' days and at the existence of this most
important US-TEC organization we begin to find elements of that power elite
structure that I have been describing. Comparable to Allen Dulles operating
with the Germans during World War II, and to the activities of T.V. Soong in
China during World War II, we see examples of how these higher echelons are
above warfare, both hot and cold, as they continue their own games on a more
exalted level.
�An item in a
US-TEC Journal of 1977 was written by David Rockefeller, Chairman of the Chase
Manhattan Bank. He has been one of the world's most important bankers as head
of one of the world�s most important banks. His letter made reference to: ' . .
. an unbroken relationship with Russian financial institutions that straddles
well over 50 years.'
�Think back 50
years from that 1977 to 1927 and then recall all of the enormous ideological,
military, economic and political problems that existed between the East and the
West; yet Rockefeller and Chase Manhattan took pride in the fact that they had
been in Moscow during that time quietly doing business in the center of the
maelstrom. Note that I mentioned above the statement of the American Charge in
Saigon to the effect.
�' . . . that in
case of bankruptcy [of the country] which we now confront, bankers have [the]
right to organize a receivership.'
�That is the
international banker�s way of putting it. He expected, as only natural, that
bankers would arrange the policy for what took place in Vietnam, as they have
done.
�All of these
things come together. The President of the United States was haranguing on TV
about the 'Evil Empire.' At the same time our senior businessmen were packing
their briefcases for another big meeting in Moscow.
�Rockefeller had
reminded all that he and his banking interests had been doing business there
since 1927, and then as a small aside, he relates how 'the seventh session of
the Dartmouth Conference in Hanover in 1972 had led to the idea of forming a
joint high-level Trade and Economic Council.'
�With these
examples I believe we have taken a good look at the plot to assassinate
President John F. Kennedy and the atmosphere in which such planning took place.
You can easily visualize a businessman's club in downtown Washington, New York,
London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, or Toronto. A group of senior members have gathered
after lunch for a third martini. One of them mentions that a director of his
company had called that morning to say that Kennedy's denial of the TFX
procurement contract to the Boeing Company had hit his company, a major
subcontractor, very hard. This struck a nerve of one of the other members, who
reported that Roz Gilpatric, who works with that 'goddamn' McNamara, had been telling
the banders things were going to change. They could no longer count on the
practices that had feathered their nests for so many years.
�Another member took a
quick sip of his martini and said �I had a call from one of our bankers in the
City early this morning. He wanted to know how we were doing and was it true
that Kennedy was going to take all Americans out of Vietnam. By God, we can't
have that. We've just sold McNamara on that electronic battlefield. It will be
worth about one and one-half billion to us. That'll go down the drain.�
�An elderly member,
who used to visit the Dulles family in their summer home on Henderson Bay,
leaned over toward the center of that small group and almost in a whisper said
that his boys had just completed a 10-year war in Vietnam. The total was in the
thousands, and the cost ran into the billions of dollars. Then he looked around
the group of old cronies and snarled, 'That goddamn Kennedy bastard has been
working all summer with some of Old Joe's Irish Mafia and his favorite generals
and they are planning every which way to get us out of Vietnam. This can't
happen. He's got to go. Right now he's a sure thing for reelection and then
there is Bobby and after him Teddy. I tell you that Kennedy has got to go.'
�On the perimeter
of that intense group sat a younger man quietly attentive to every word and
watching every move. Just then, as the speaker finished his words, he saw a
wink in the eye of a senior member. He rose quietly and walked to a position
behind his chair. That member turned and whispered a few words. They were all
that he needed to hear, �In the fall, somewhere in the south. Find a way to get
as many key people out of the city as possible. It's all up to you.�
�There was the
decision. It had been the result of a consensus of not that one meeting, but of
many. This meeting was the climax. This man was a skilled professional. He knew
the codes, how to use them and who to call. He knew exactly how to set the
train of events into operation. He knew then that his biggest job would be to
put a small cadre of the men in the world at work right away on the cover story
and on the deception plan.�
Happy Thanksgiving,
everyone. Bless you, JFK, wherever you are.
Jerry Mazza is a
freelance writer, residing in Manhattan. Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.