Who controls state-to-state requests for disaster assistance, the states or
the federal government? Most people would say the states, of course.
But, that might not be the case. The federal government may
secretly control state-to-state assistance requests through a little-known
entity called, the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC).
In the wake of the Hurricane Katrina disaster, which included
communications and logistics failures across the board, and
with similar problems after Hurricane Rita (voiced Wednesday in
Congress by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX)), EMAC has
largely escaped public scrutiny.
EMAC is touted by
federal officials as central to national disaster relief efforts. In fact,
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) strongly urges that
all state-to-state requests for disaster assistance, including requests
for National Guard units, be processed through EMAC,
particularly if the states want reimbursement of costs from FEMA.
For such an
important organization as EMAC, congressional investigators should ask why
the Department of Homeland Security's 'National Response Plan' (NRP) doesn't
even mention EMAC.
What is EMAC and
who controls it? Originally, it was founded in 1993 by the Southern Governor's
Association and funded by member states. Its mission was to improve the
coordination of disaster relief in the wake of Hurricane Andrew.
Today, it is a "congressionally ratified" organization
based in Lexington, Kentucky. Every state except Hawaii has joined it.
FEMA now
funds EMAC (a $2 million grant over a three-year period), but it is
administered by NEMA (National Emergency
Management Association), a non-profit 501(c)(3) association for state
emergency officials, businesses, and other organizations. NEMA only has a
seven-member staff.
Incredibly, only
one member of the NEMA staff is tasked to run
the EMAC program. Although each state should have personnel
assigned to work with EMAC, the organization itself has no
employees. And the EMAC website posts no contact phone numbers. Heavy reliance
on a computer system seems to be central to the system. And in that regard, the
webmaster is a private contractor.
With so little
manpower and scant financing, its hard to believe that EMAC is for real. A
former intelligence operative believes that it might not be; that it could
be a "forwarding address" or "drop box," in other words, a
"front" for another organization. And if that's the case, it could
easily be a front for a federal agency, since it's funded by FEMA.
It seems that
both NEMA and FEMA want EMAC to appear indispensable to state
governments. "If you're not using EMAC, you're
pretty much on your own to make phone calls, to find resources from other
states, and it creates a lot more chaos," said Angela Copple,
NEMA's designated staffer for EMAC. It's hard to imagine
anything more chaotic than the bureaucratic bungling of Katrina.
Another NEMA
spokesperson, Karen Cobuluis, told this reporter that
before EMAC was created state legislatures needed to convene in order to
approve any disaster assistance to another state, and
that included "anything from requests for a backhoe to
hazmat gear . . . to requests for National Guard units", she said.
That
claim is nonsense on its face. But, with specific regard to the deployment
of National Guard units, Danielle E. Klinger, spokesperson for Pennsylvania's
Department of Military and Veterans Affairs told this reporter, "Prior to
EMAC, the process . . . did not require the state legislature to convene . . . a
separate memorandum of agreement between states would have had to been drafted
and required the approval and signatures of both governors." And according
to a spokesperson for the National Guard Bureau, Brad Swezey, that
separate agreement is still needed.
With the help of
FEMA it appears that EMAC has a chokehold on state-to-state
disaster coordination. On August 29, as state and local officials in Louisiana
and Mississippi began screaming for help, Michael D. Brown, Under
Secretary of Homeland Security for Emergency Preparedness and Response and head
of the FEMA, " . . . urged all fire and emergency services departments not
to respond to counties and states affected by Hurricane Katrina without being
requested and lawfully dispatched by state and local authorities under mutual
aid agreements and the Emergency Management Assistance Compact."
Many national
organizations complied. Firemen and ham radio operators were told by their
national organizations (International Association of Fire Chiefs, National Association
for Amateur Radio, and Amateur Radio Emergency Service) to not respond to
requests for help outside of the EMAC network.
Law enforcement
was also stood down. A Virginia paper reported that a police spokesperson said,
"There is nothing to prevent an official from acquiring the assistance of
another law enforcement agency and adsorbing the cost in their budget . . . However,
if an agency wants reimbursement from FEMA, they must follow the application
process required by the EMAC agreement."
However,
reimbursement may not come regardless of compliance with EMAC. According to a
September 26, article in the Ocala Star-Banner, "[Marion] County {Florida]
officials have . . . complained that they still haven't received millions of
dollars in reimbursements from FEMA for (last year's) hurricane (Jeanne) costs.
U.S. Reps. Alcee Hastings, D- Miramar, and Mark Foley, R-Jupiter wrote acting
FEMA director R. David Paulison last week to express their frustrations over
the issue."
The
EMAC website claims, " . . . (EMAC) provides form and structure to
interstate mutual aid. Through EMAC, a disaster impacted state can request and
receive assistance from other member states quickly and efficiently . . ."
Katrina and Rita
prove otherwise. But, a more disturbing issue remains. Is the federal
government secretly controlling state-to-state requests for disaster
assistance?
Lynn
Landes is the publisher of EcoTalk.org and a freelance journalist who specializes in politics,
voting, the environment, and health. She can be reached at 215–629–3553.