Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Commentary
 
 Features
 
 Politics
 
 World
 
 Health
 
 Business
 
 Odd News
Search

Health Last Updated: Mar 11th, 2011 - 15:30:48


Death Row Texas DNA - Civil Rights Law Allows DNA Test Review
Caroline Lorraine

Mar 7, 2011, 12:39

Email This Article
Printer Friendly Page
A death row Texas inmate's DNA can be reviewed according to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday that determined the inmate can use federal civil rights law to ask for a review of DNA evidence.

Death row inmate Henry W. Skinner has consistently maintained his innocence. His imminent execution was stayed at the last hour by the Supreme Court last year.

Skinner, now 49, was sentenced for the 1993 murders of his girlfriend and her two adult sons in the Texas Panhandle city of Pampa on New Year's Eve. The girlfriend, Twila Busby, was strangled and beaten with an ax handle and her mentally disabled sons, Elwin Caler and Randy Busby, were stabbed.

Skinner, who worked as a paralegal at the time of his arrest, has asked for new DNA testing on blood found on knives at the murder scene and material beneath the woman's fingernails, as well as rape kit samples.

More than six years after his conviction, a new Texas law allowed prisoners to gain post-conviction DNA testing in limited circumstances.

The Texas courts have denied Skinner's request for DNA testing, and federal courts said Skinner could not ask for the testing under federal civil rights law.

But in a majority opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Supreme Court said there is federal court subject-matter jurisdiction over Skinner's complaint, and the claim he makes is recognizable under civil rights law.

The opinion noted Skinner is challenging the Texas courts' interpretation of the state DNA statute.

Ginsburg said in an earlier similar case out of Alaska, the Supreme Court only assumed that there was a right to make a claim under civil rights law, but did not specifically rule that there was. The latest ruling nails down that right.

A federal appeals court ruling was reversed and the case sent down for a new hearing based on Monday's majority opinion.

Source: UPI






Copyright © 1998-2011 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Health
Latest Headlines
California Tsunami Warning Details
Tsunami Warning Expands to Cover Entire West Coast of U.S.
Philippines Evacuated as Country Braces for Tsunami Waves
Swine Influenza Twice as Deadly This Winter for British
Erin Brockovich Takes on Hinkley's Water Once Again
Zdeno Chara Incident Prompts Criminal Investigation & NHL Sponsorship Crisis
Bipolar Rates Highest in United States of America
Benlysta Earns FDA Approval to Treat Lupus
Vegemite Product Aimed at Kids Slammed for High Sodium
Death Row Texas DNA - Civil Rights Law Allows DNA Test Review
Japan Suspends Vaccine: 4 Children Died Following Vaccine
Skippy Peanut Butter Recall: Possible Salmonella Contamination
Study Finds Drug Effective in Treating Vision Loss in Diabetics
Gallstones Linked to Heart Disease, Cancer
Charlie Sheen Drama Continues to Unfold
Napping Improves Mental Abilities, Says Study
Diabetes Belt Identified by CDC Shows Growth of Epidemic
Alice in Chains Member Mike Starr Found Dead
Zsa Zsa Gabor Refusing Complete Leg Amputation
Mickey Rooney Speaks About Abuse with Senate Committee on Aging

Home | About Us | Authors | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Top