Since I wrote Burying the
Lancet Report . . . and the Children (Online Journal) in December, a
number of people have asked me, �What about the other surveys that produced
lower estimates of civilian deaths than the Lancet
report?� The appearance of inconsistency between different surveys has led most
news organizations to adopt the phrase �tens of thousands� when speaking of
civilian deaths.
In this article, I hope to clarify the apparent
inconsistencies between these different surveys. Six distinct groups have
conducted and published surveys of civilian deaths in Iraq since the invasion.
These surveys were conducted at different points in the conflict and with
different methodologies, and it is important to understand exactly what each of
them was attempting to count and when. Some were actual counts, which
inevitably tend to underestimate deaths in war zones, while others used
statistical methods to overcome this problem. Some counted only civilians
killed by actual acts of war and some counted all violent deaths, while the Lancet report estimated total excess
deaths from all causes resulting from the war.
Iraq Body Count Website
When President Bush recently spoke of 30,000 civilians
killed in Iraq, his press secretary said that he was citing �published
reports.� Directly or indirectly, what he was probably citing was Iraq Body Count. But I Iraq Body Count�s database is not
intended as an estimate of total deaths. Its methodology is to record only
war-related violent deaths that are reported by at least two approved
international media sources. This generates a record of deaths that is accepted by the media that publish
these reports in the first place. Its authors acknowledge that thousands of
deaths go unreported in their database, but they say they cannot prevent
politicians and the media misrepresenting their figures as an actual estimate
of deaths. Iraq Body Count�s
�minimum� number now stands at about 34,000.
The
People�s Kifah Survey
Six months after
the invasion, an Iraqi group called the People�s Kifah mobilized hundreds of
academics and volunteers who �spoke and coordinated with grave-diggers across
Iraq, obtained information from hospitals and spoke to thousands of witnesses
who saw incidents in which Iraqi civilians were killed by U.S. fire.�
Unfortunately they were forced to abandon the project when one of their
researchers, Ramzi Musa Ahmad, was seized by Kurdish militiamen, reportedly
handed over to U.S. forces, and never seen again. However, after only a month
or two�s work, the People�s Kifah had already gathered evidence of at least
37,000 violent civilian deaths by October 2003.
The Iraq Living Conditions
Survey
This survey was conducted by the Ministry of Planning and
Development Cooperation of the Coalition Provisional Authority in April and May
2004 and was published in May 2005 by the U.N. Development Program. The �UNDP�
imprimatur and the large sample size gave credence to its reassuringly low
figure of about 24,000 �war deaths.� Tony Blair�s biographer John Rentoul told
me that, in his opinion, this survey was definitive. However, its estimate of
war-deaths was derived from a single question posed to families in the course
of a 90-minute interview on living conditions, and the Norwegian designer of
the survey has said that this number was certainly an underestimate. More than
half of the deaths reported were in the southern region of Iraq, suggesting
that it captured deaths in the initial invasion rather than in the violence
that followed. In any case, after the invasion itself, the period covered by
this survey was one of relative calm, and the two years of increasing violence
that have followed are unaccounted for.
The Lancet Report
In September 2004, an international team of epidemiologists
conducted a �cluster sample survey� of excess civilian deaths caused by the war
in Iraq, comparing the pre-invasion and post-invasion periods. Their results
were published in the British medical journal, the Lancet. They estimated that at least 100,000 Iraqi civilians had
died in the previous 18 months as a result of the invasion and occupation of
their country. This included additional deaths from heart attacks, strokes,
infectious diseases and car accidents as well as from violence. However, they
found that �violence accounted for most of the excess deaths and air strikes
from coalition forces accounted for most violent deaths.�
The authors of the Lancet
report made the conservative decision to exclude the much higher death rate
they found in a cluster in Fallujah from their results, effectively leaving
Anbar province out of the survey altogether. Including this data would have
resulted in an estimate of 285,000 deaths. They, therefore, had a high degree
of confidence in their conservative estimate of at least 100,000 total excess
deaths from all causes, and in their statements attributing the majority of
violent deaths to coalition air strikes. The Lancet report remains the most
comprehensive study of mortality in post-invasion Iraq, but its authors' calls
for additional studies to clarify its findings and for a reduction in air
strikes have both been ignored.
Iraqi
Health Ministry Reports
When Tony Blair was asked about the Lancet report in December 2004, he responded that, �Figures from
the Iraqi Ministry of Health, which are a survey from the hospitals there, are
in our view the most accurate survey there is.� In fact, the Iraqi Health
Ministry reports, whose accuracy he praised, confirmed the Lancet report�s conclusion that aerial attacks by coalition forces
were the leading cause of violent civilian deaths. Nancy Youssef of Knight Ridder wrote about one such
report on September 25, 2004, under the headline �U.S. Attacks, Not Insurgents,
Blamed for Most Iraqi Deaths.�
The Health Ministry began counting civilian deaths inflicted
by coalition and resistance forces, as reported by hospitals, in June 2004. In
the three months from June 10 to September 10, it counted 1,295 civilians
killed by U.S. forces and their allies and 516 killed in �terrorist�
operations. Health Ministry officials told Ms. Youssef that the �statistics
captured only part of the death toll,� and emphasized that aerial bombardment
was largely responsible for the higher numbers of deaths attributable to
coalition forces.
BBC World Affairs Editor John Simpson reported on another
Health Ministry report that covered the six months from July 1, 2004, to
January 1, 2005. This report cited 2,041 civilians killed by U.S. and allied
forces versus 1,233 by �insurgents.� Then something strange but sadly
predictable happened. The Iraqi Health Minister�s office contacted the BBC and
claimed that the figures had been misinterpreted; the BBC eventually issued a
retraction; and details of deaths caused by coalition forces have been notably
absent from subsequent Health Ministry reports.
Iraqiyun Survey
Iraqiyun is an
Iraqi humanitarian group headed by Dr. Hatim Al-Alwani and affiliated with the
political party of Interim President Ghazi Al-Yawir. It released its report on
July 12, 2005, making it the most recent survey to date. It counted 128,000
actual violent deaths, of whom 55 percent were women and children under the age
of 12. The report specified that it included only confirmed deaths reported to
relatives, omitting the large numbers of people who have simply disappeared
without trace amid the violence and chaos.
Conclusion
Violence against civilians by Iraqi government and
resistance forces has increased since most of these surveys were conducted. The
U.S. air war has also intensified, especially during assaults on Fallujah and
other towns in Anbar and Salahuddin provinces, and since the last few months of
2005. The U.S. Air Force acknowledged conducting about 290 air strikes in
November and December 2005, compared with a total of 200 in the eight months
between January and August.
More
U.S. soldiers have died in Iraq during the period since the Lancet report was conducted in September
2004 than in the period it covered, and there is every reason to think that the
same must be true of civilians. If, like the Lancet report, we are speaking of all civilian deaths that have
resulted from the war, it is, therefore, now accurate to speak in terms of
hundreds of thousands rather than tens of thousands. The results of the other
five surveys, taken each in their own context and collectively, are entirely
consistent with this conclusion.