Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Analysis Last Updated: Jan 26th, 2010 - 01:17:13


The �war on terrorism� and the countdown to the 2010 Olympics
By Dana Gabriel
Online Journal Guest Writer


Jan 26, 2010, 00:46

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics will be the largest security operation in Canadian history. It will include more than 15,000 Canadian Forces, private security personnel, along with the RCMP and other police agencies. The U.S. will also provide security and support for the Games.

With the Olympics fast approaching, the fear of terrorism is back in the public�s psyche. Although there has been no specific threats to the Games, more than anything, it is the danger of terrorism which is used to justify the huge security operation. This is further advancing the militarization of North America and U.S.-Canada military and security integration. The Olympics will take binational security cooperation to a whole new level.

Unmanned drones are patrolling the U.S.-Canada border as part of the �war on terrorism� and to curb smuggling, along with drug trafficking. It is unclear if they will be used for surveillance during the Games, but U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman, Juan Munoz-Torres has stated, �If the RCMP or Canadian government believes they can make use of the aircraft for support during the Olympics, we will be more than willing to provide it.�

In Afghanistan, Pakistan and other parts of the world, armed American drones continue to carry out strikes against suspected terrorists and insurgents. It is interesting that many of the weapons used in the �war on terrorism� overseas are later deployed for domestic purposes. The use of unmanned drones on the northern border will only add to the further militarization of North America.

In May of 2009, former Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan and U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano signed the Shiprider Agreement which grew out of a pilot project inspired by the Security and Prosperity Partnership. It was later tabled in the House of Commons as Bill C-60, the Keeping Canadians Safe (Protecting Borders) Act. The cross-border maritime security law would deputize U.S. officers operating in shared waterways during integrated operations, including pursuit on adjacent land.

Stuart Trew of the Council of Canadians commented on the motivation surrounding Bill C-60, as well as several other pieces of legislation. �The effort seems purely aimed at appeasing U.S. concerns about Canadian security practices and is another step towards a perimeter approach to �securing� North America as a whole.� As for the prorogation of Canada�s Parliament, he noted that �although with C-60 off the order paper there is no legislative backing for the arrangement. U.S. police forces will be patrolling Canadian waterways on RCMP ships during the 2010 Winter Olympics.�

General Gene Renuart, commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM), has given some indication as to the function both will play during the Olympics. He stated, �We, in our NORAD role, will maintain the air sovereignty both for the U.S. and Canada, the air security over the Olympic games.� He went on to say, �In our NORTHCOM role, we�ll probably provide some additional security and support . . . and consequence management response capability.�

NORAD�s deputy commander, Lt. Gen. Marcel Duval, recently expanded on the binational organization�s responsibilities during the Olympics. �NORAD will do its normal airspace warning and aerospace control mission over the games using Canadian NORAD-region assets, [such as] Canadian CF-18s.� He also added, �We�ll be supported by other NORAD assets like air-to-air refueling and airborne early-warning aircraft.� In regards to Canada Command, NORTHCOM and NORAD�s preparations for the Olympics, Duval acknowledged, �In many ways, the 2010 Winter Games have allowed the three commands to come closer, in terms of understanding, cooperating and collaborating.�

Canadian officials continue to work closely with their American counterparts in monitoring potential security threats to the Games and its shared border. The Olympic Security Coordination Centre in Bellingham, Washington, �will coordinate the security efforts for over 40 federal, state and local agencies on the U.S. side of the U.S.-Canadian border. This facility will provide a strategic response platform to facilitate critical response efforts during the Olympic Games and beyond.� In the advent of an emergency situation, the bilateral Civil Assistance Plan, signed by the U.S.-Canadian military in February of 2008, could be activated. The agreement allows the military of one nation to support the other during a civil emergency, such as a flood, forest fire, hurricane, earthquake or a terrorist attack.

A U.S. State Department fact sheet is advising Americans attending the Vancouver 2010 Olympics to use caution and be alert to their surroundings at all times. While it notes that there has been no specific or credible threats associated with the Olympics, it does warn of a possible Al-Qaeda attack. It states, �As security increases in and around Olympic venues, terrorists could shift their focus to more unprotected Olympic venues, open public spaces, hotels, railway and other transportation systems, churches, restaurants, and other sites not associated with the Olympics.� It goes on to say that, �Al-Qaeda�s demonstrated capability to carry out sophisticated attacks against sizable structures -- such as ships, large office buildings, embassies and hotels -- makes it one of the greatest potential threats to the Olympics.�

In the aftermath of the failed Christmas day bombing attempt, once again terrorism is being used to create a climate of fear and insecurity.

Whether or not you buy into the whole �war on terrorism,� it is being used to launch wars of aggression and further expand the American empire. It is also very much intertwined with the whole process of deep North American integration and plans for a continental security perimeter. The threat level for the upcoming Olympics remains low, but some are warning that the proroguing of Canada�s Parliament, along with the huge security apparatus being assembled for the Games might be setting the stage for a possible false flag terror event. This could be used to pass more anti-terrorist and other draconian pieces of legislation. It could also lead to a martial law scenario with American troops occupying parts of Canada.

Dana Gabriel is an activist and independent researcher. He writes about trade, globalization, sovereignty, as well as other issues. Contact: beyourownleader@hotmail.com. Visit his blog site at beyourownleader.blogspot.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Analysis
Latest Headlines
Does Blair�s testimony clarify the motive behind the Iraq war?
Middle East needs bridges, not walls
Rule by the rich
Russia, Turkey and the Great Game: Changing teams
Blair faces the hot seat
The �war on terrorism� and the countdown to the 2010 Olympics
The United States of Corporate America: From democracy to plutocracy
The merchants of fear: Israel�s profiting from homeland insecurity
�Chemical Ali� is only one culprit
Ethiopia commits genocide and Eritrea gets sanctioned
The truth about Haiti�s suffering
Image of the beast
Wall Street awards big bonuses; Obama fails to stem abuse
Is anyone telling us the truth?
The Chilcot Inquiry: Britain�s 9/11 commission
Let the plunder begin: The return of Robert Rubin
Reagan�s ghost: Star Wars stops START
Economy 2010: From the scandalous known past to the uncertain future
First Circle: Liberty has been lost
Obama�s compromised domestic policy, militarized foreign policy