The Council
of Europe document �Internet Governance and critical
Internet resources�
states (p.7) that � . . . the Internet of Things refers to the seamless
connection of devices, sensors, objects, rooms, machines, vehicles, etc,
through fixed and wireless networks. Connected sensors, devices and tags can
interact with the environment and send the information to other objects through
machine-to-machine communication . . . The Semantic Web promotes this synergy: even agents
that where not expressly designed to work together can transfer data among
themselves when the data come with semantics.�
Pachube (pronounced Patch-bay) is a platform that
helps individuals and organisations connect to and build the �internet of things�
and enable buildings, interactive environments, networked energy meters,
virtual worlds and sensor devices to �talk� and �respond� to each other.
Pachube, according to the founder, Usman Haque, is a vision inspired by Dutch architect Constant
Nieuwenhuys and his 1956 proposal for a visionary society, New Babylon.
Around the
world, a near invisible network of RFID wireless tags is being put on almost
every type of consumer item. Wireless tags and sensors are being produced in
their billions and are capable of being connected to the Internet in an
instant. Yet this network is being built with little public knowledge or
consent.
IT company
Hewlett Packard intends to create a Central Nervous System for the Earth
(CeNSE),
consisting of a trillion
nanoscale sensors and actuators embedded in the environment and
connected via an array of networks
with computing systems, software and services to exchange their information
among analysis engines, storage systems and end users. Ericsson, the Mobile telecommunications
company, predicts that 50 billion devices will be wirelessly
connected in 2020
and Cisco envisages the next generation of the Internet as having 1,000 times as many devices as the
current Internet.
Sense Networks collects billions of data points about people�s locations from cell phones, taxi cabs,
cameras, GPS devices, WiFi positioning, cell tower triangulation, RFID and
other sensors to locate people and help predict human behaviour on a macro
scale. This is the original text of the CitySense proposal submitted to the NSF
Computing Research Infrastructure program in 2006.
Tracking and locating people and objects which are
constantly moving is said to have become more important to the daily routine of
individuals, commercial organisations, the emergency services [and
governments]. GlobalTag is the
first wireless tracking device that incorporates GPS, RFID, Sensors and
Satellite Communications. And the Viewpoint i2g
can track assets and/or personnel whether they are indoors or out. ViewPoint
integrates the interior positioning system (IPS) data of the ViewPoint system
with data from global positioning system (GPS) sources. This integrated IPS and
GPS information can be accessed from popular mapping services, including
GoogleEarth and Microsoft Virtual Earth.
Considering
that the doors of a many cars can be locked and unlocked with a signal, how
long will it be before similar technology is applied to the doors and windows
of all buildings, including each and every home. Each building will probably
have a receptor which receives a signal and activates the locking of doors and
windows. The receptors on homes in a housing estate, for instance, could be
switched on or off, via the Internet of Things, in a manner similar to the way
that a telecommunications company can disconnect some landline telephones in a
street while leaving the other landlines in that street connected. Sometime in
the future, people with anti-social tendencies may end up being locked up in
their own homes while their fridges, lights and other household appliances are
controlled by Big Brother through the Internet of Things.
A recent
study for the European Commission entitled �Towards a future Internet�, stresses the view that much of the governance issues for the future
Internet are related to political will and leadership . . . A balance must be struck between overregulation
and under-regulation, a safe society and a surveillance society. The future
Internet should not be designed for technocrats, governments and businesses,
but for ordinary citizens, while protecting their security and privacy and
limiting government surveillance and Orwellian-like control. The report goes on to conclude that the
current Internet administration has limited transparency and that the Internet
has become increasingly ubiquitous and grown to become a critical infrastructure, on both a technical and socio-economic
level and that in the future, there will be multiple Internets, rather
than the single Internet we have today.
This article states that �A new Internet (GENI) could ultimately mean replacing networking
equipment and rewriting software on computers, at a cost of billions of
dollars. But any new network is likely to run parallel with the existing one
for some time, with individuals and businesses gradually migrating over as they
need more advanced applications.�
In 2002, W3C founder Sir Tim
Berners-Lee raised what is known as �Issue 25� regarding �What to say in
defense of principle that deep linking is not a legal act?.� By the end of 2009, Issue 25
had still not
been resolved. W3C members include the UK and US governments, so
Issue 25 says a great deal about the true spirit of �Open Government� when W3C are willing
to go ahead with the semantic web and linking
open data without firstly finding out if their activities are legal or illegal.
Page
13 of the EIFFEL Report
states, �We are beginning to cluster the world around us,
but we are only at early stages. Newspapers were a mechanism for filtering,
organizing and limiting information that otherwise would overwhelm us. With the
demise of newspapers, what elements of the almost infinite flow of bits will
bring order that is reflective of the human mind and human social structure? . .
. In the current economic and political situation, no country can make
decisions that will have only a local effect. There is no more isolation. Given
that, one must consider the relationship between the Internet and governance. And perhaps even
more importantly, the Internet may change forever governance
of, by or for a people. Blogging and cell phone cameras that can transmit
photos are having profound effects on the capability of individuals to
constrain their governments at times when the governments may not want that.�