Online Journal
Front Page 
 Special Reports
 News Media
 Elections & Voting
 Social Security
 Editors' Blog
 Reclaiming America
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 The Lighter Side
 The Mailbag
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Join Mailing List

Commentary Last Updated: Jun 3rd, 2009 - 01:06:34

The US Army blows Israel�s nuclear cover
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor

Jun 3, 2009, 00:20

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

We could say it was the best-known secret in the world that was finally officially revealed, i.e., that Israel has nuclear weapons, despite the US�s �policy of ambiguity.� Those of you who are really surprised raise your hand.

Nevertheless, a Defense Department study finished last year reveals for the first time in an unclassified report that Israel really is a nuclear power. Actually, it�s on page 37 of the US Joint Forces Command report, where the Army claims Israel is within �a growing arc of nuclear powers that runs from Israel in the west through an emerging Iran to Pakistan, India, and on to China, North Korea, and Russia in the east.� Is there anybody that doesn�t have the bomb? Raise your hand. Sorry.

This reference is much more than the US usually states publicly about Israel, the poster nation of goodness and truth for so many Jewish folk about the globe. Yet the world knew Israel was heavily involved with nuclear weapons before whistleblower and former nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu, then an orthodox Jew, exposed the facts on its weapons program via a major story with pictures in the London Times.

Vanunu did 18 years in solitary for that. Upon his release in 2004, he spoke to a reporter and was put under house arrest. He is now a Christian, not to mention an incredibly brave man. Read Eileen Fleming�s excellent article The Martyrdom of Mordechai Vanunu. The nuclear plant in question was at Dimona in a subterranean basement hidden from sight. The reactor by now is quite old and not particularly safe. But what the hell: in for two-to-four hundred missiles, in for Chernobyl.

Actually, a few years later no less than the New Yorker�s star investigative reporter, Seymour Hersh, published the book The Samson Option, which laid out Israel�s strategy �of massive nuclear retaliation against Arab states in the event it felt its very existence was threatened.� He also mentioned the 200- to 400-missile figure.

Yet Israel has been mum about its nuclear capability, refusing to confirm or deny it. And the US waltzes right along with this dance on the nuclear edge.

Perhaps the real reason for the charade is that by law the US would have to stop providing billions of dollars in foreign aid to Israel every year if we actually said out loud that Israel had a nuclear weapons program, in fact an arsenal of 200 to 400 nuclear missiles. The reason for that is the Symington Amendment, legislation introduced by Stuart Symington, a former Democratic senator from Missouri, and authored to strengthen the US position on nuclear non-proliferation. It was passed in 1976 and bars assistance to any countries developing technology for nuclear weapons proliferation.

Given the US�s deaf, dumb and blind, see-no, hear-no, say no evil policy when it comes to Israeli nukes, it�s most likely that the 2008 Joint Operating Environment report put together by the Army will amount to not much more than a proofreader�s wince. Although it should be a shot heard round the world fired as far back as the 1950s when France aided and abetted Israel in the building of the nuclear facility in return for Israeli scientists helping France assemble their own facility.

Thus, the facilitators will most likely carry the day, as usual, while Iran gets bonked daily for building a nuclear facility for power-generating reasons. And now North Korea is testing its own nuclear missiles without anything more than a rhetorical response from the US. Well, the one thing you can�t accuse the US of is consistency.

One wonders where President Obama is in the middle of all this and if AIPAC and Rahm Emmanuel are still running Middle Eastern foreign policy.

In fact, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, whose editor recently proclaimed she was proud to be a Zionist, said in a March 8 article that �It is virtually unheard of for a senior military commander, while in office, to refer to Israel�s nuclear status.� Haaretz was referring to the fact that �In December 2006, during his confirmation hearings as secretary of defense, Robert Gates, referred to Israel as one of the powers seen by Iran as surrounding it with nuclear weapons.� Doth Haaretz protest too much that Gates spoke?

His bad was right for once. But once in office, Gates dodged the bullet and refused to repeat the no-no allusion to Israeli nukes. He said that he had used it when he was a private citizen. Does that mean he doesn�t tell the truth now that he�s our secretary of defense? Well, play around with that conundrum for a minute or two. And you might want to look at my Online Journal article, Israel�s 60 years of nuclear proliferation.

Nevertheless, lest we get too heavy here, I think of what the iconic political writer, satirist, stand-up comic, eminent creator of the 1960s The Realist magazine (breathe deep), Paul Krassner recently said about the whole Israeli/Palestine issue in an interview, titled �In the Jester�s Court,� by David Kupfer in the The Sun magazine.

When asked by Kupfer, �As a Jew and a humanist, how do you feel about the Israeli government�s treatment of the Palestinians?�

Krassner responded, �First of all, I don�t consider myself to be Jewish, since I don�t accept the tenets of the religion, and, unlike the Nazis, I don�t believe that Judaism is a race. I don�t think Jews are the chosen people, or even that people are the chosen species. But I�m not a self-hating Jew. Though I was circumcised against my will, I don�t plan to have my foreskin sewn back on.

�As an atheist and an absurdist, I feel the most absurd thing I can do is to have a dialogue with the God I don�t believe in: �Since you�re all-powerful and you know everything that�s ever going to happen,� I say, �you had to know what would happen if the Jews immigrated to Palestine. You knew the Palestinians wouldn�t greet them with �Welcome, please take our land.� You told the Jews that this was the Promised Land, but you didn�t have an exit strategy.� And then I hear the voice of God: �I never made any promises. I only said I�d see what I could do.��

Oh god, what an incredible breath of fresh air.

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York City. Reach him at His new book, State Of Shock: Poems from 9/11 on� is available at, Amazon or

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Oslo redux: Fool�s gold in Israel/Palestine
A �debate� without civility and a murder
The AIPAC espionage case: We can�t even take the law into our own hands
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- why the U.S. should care less
The US Army blows Israel�s nuclear cover
Wanted: A new direction
On Dr. Tiller�s death: �Common ground� is a deadly illusion; abortion on demand and without apology!
Discipline Israel, negotiate with Iran, but first, cast aside religion
Western military cartography and the �terror technique�
Obama vs. Cheney: Imperial debate
Why the torture photos should be released
Maliki�s challenge, Obama�s opportunity
Everyone should see �Torturing Democracy�
Netanyahu�s new quest: The game is on
The significance of India�s election
American values
Torture and the American conscience
Against the tortured logic of Obama's placebo presidency, a call for the audacity of hopelessness
Trade protectionism and worldwide economic contraction
Never mind N. Korea, who will stand up to America and Israel?