Remember the endless media coverage devoted to one abducted
British toddler, Madeleine McCann, and the outpouring of public sympathy in
terms of hard cash? Remember the deserved global horror when 186 schoolchildren
were murdered by terrorists in the Russian town of Beslan? People everywhere
generally experience deep emotion when the lives of youngsters are cut short by
crime or conflict because they only have to look at their own kids to relate to
the tragedy.
Yet when it comes to the children of Palestine many
unconsciously channel their empathy -- or lack of it -- through the prism of
their ideological/political affinities. They hear the word �Palestinian� and
harden their hearts. Blatantly one-sided resolutions recently passed by the US
Congress, which prostrates itself before Israel unconditionally, are good
examples. Somehow, the members of the House and Senate are able to cast aside
their own humanitarian sensitivities to enhance their standing with the
pro-Israel lobby.
Almost 300 of Gaza�s children have been murdered by Israeli
bombs and artillery shells. Thousands have been robbed of parents, siblings or
limbs. All are severely traumatized by sights and scenes no child should ever
have to witness and all are terrified by the sounds of F-16s, wondering if this
time deadly payloads are marked with their address.
Israeli spokespeople insist they do not target civilians but
tiny Gaza is not only the most densely populated area of the world, 51 percent
of its population are children.
Just think what would happen were 300 Israeli children to
meet a similar fate! Would the UN Security Council take weeks to come up with a
mealy-mouthed resolution destined to go unheeded then? And what would be the
global reaction to the ramming of an Israeli boat carrying aid, such as the
Free Gaza Movement�s vessel �Dignity,� recently forced to limp in to the
Lebanese port of Tyre where its contingent of 15 international passengers,
including former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, received a hero�s welcome?
Would Western television networks and newspapers relegate a
Jewish tragedy to sanitized snippets and back pages? Judging from the extensive
coverage given to a Palestinian attack on a Jerusalem pizza parlor in 2001 that
killed 15, the answer is a firm �no.�
Israel says it is carrying out surgical strikes against
Hamas militants but the fire hitting Gaza�s shoreline emanating from Israeli
gunboats cannot discriminate and neither can tank shells, mortars, cluster
bombs and white phosphorus. If we accept that Israel�s strikes are precise,
then we must also accept the Jewish state has committed serious war crimes by
bombing clearly marked ambulances, hospitals, schools and UN-run civilian
refuges.
No wonder Israel has barred foreign journalists, activists
and medics from entering Gaza. It does not want third-party witnesses recording
its crimes or negating its weasel words carefully crafted by expert
propagandists, such as Israel�s ambassador to Britain Ron Prosser and spokesman
to the prime minister�s office Mark Regev -- both working overtime to push the
same rarely-challenged lies.
There is no doubt that the so-called international community
treats Palestinians as second- or even third-class citizens without the right
to freedom and access to basic human needs. Western countries and others have
collaborated in subjecting Gaza to an 18-month-long siege that under
international law is tantamount to a declaration of war. They have also stood
by silently allowing Israel to continue its settlement expansion, land grabs
and construction of an apartheid wall, ruled illegal by the International Court
of Justice.
Plus, the United Nations which was responsible for Israel�s
birth has not been effective in protecting Palestinian rights or upholding 35
of its own resolutions against Israel.
Many nations have designated the Palestinian resistance as
�terrorist� although an occupied population has the right to self-determination
under the UN Charter.
It�s absolutely true that some of the methods used by
Palestinian resistance groups have been unpalatable in that civilians have been
deliberately targeted in the way that Israel is doing now despite its shrill
cries to the contrary.
The fact that the IAF bombed a UN school after receiving the
coordinates and a house filled with displaced civilians it had told to flee
exposes any pretense Israel may have to morality. And to compound its
ruthlessness, Israel prevented rescue workers and ambulances from reaching the
scene for four days when starving toddlers still clinging to the corpses of
their mothers were discovered. Deprived of sophisticated weaponry, stripped of
their rights under international law and the Geneva Conventions, besieged by the
international community, blamed by the US for their own victimhood and
virtually abandoned by fellow-Arabs, the Palestinians are shamefully left to
starve, suffer and die.
Lastly, I would send the following message to Israel with
apologies to Shakespeare for mangling The
Merchant of Venice: �Hath not a Palestinian hands, organs, dimensions,
senses, affections, passions, fed with the same food, hurt with the same
weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and
cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Jew is? If you prick us, do we not
bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And
if you wrong us, do we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will
resemble you in that.�
Linda
S. Heard is a British specialist writer on Middle East affairs. She welcomes
feedback and can be contacted by email at heardonthegrapevines@yahoo.co.uk.