Online Journal
Front Page 
 Special Reports
 News Media
 Elections & Voting
 Social Security
 Editors' Blog
 Reclaiming America
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 The Lighter Side
 The Mailbag
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Join Mailing List

Commentary Last Updated: Mar 21st, 2008 - 00:10:06

Boeing or EADS? Don't give a damn!
By Reza Fiyouzat
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Mar 21, 2008, 01:01

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The announcement that the Defense Department chose to give some lucrative contracts to the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co., instead of Boeing, has been met with outrage and hoo-ha on the left, right and the center. If only I had enough time to list them all.

Lou Dobbs was livid, though; he was beside himself. Other commentators, too, were more than furious: How can they be sending tens of thousands of American jobs to some rival company in France, especially at a time of economic recession? Francophobia was churned out now by the ideological workers and journalists organically affiliated with the liberal wing of the establishment. "These same Republicans changed the name of french fries to freedom fries, for Christ's sake! Now look at them!" "Can you believe it?" "The nerve of the Bush administration!" "Incredible!" "Outrageous!"

And what are these contracts for? For the production of tanker aircrafts that provide fueling for the continuous, around the clock delivery of mass murder, domination and pillage. So, pardon me if I differ.

Why should anybody give a damn which company produces these enablers of weapons that only serve to further the goals of a gang of mass murderers? We should be livid that these things are produced at all. There is not a single power on this earth that can do any harm to the U.S. militarily, yet more than 50 percent of the federal budget of what was the wealthiest country in the world continues to be poured into the pockets of arms producers, and all their related industries. So, until the people of the United States -- the organized and the unorganized labor, as well as all other community and political organizations in the civil society -- find a way of fundamentally challenging the existing setup, what does it matter that a portion of this blood money gets shifted to some other location within this global network of terror?

One question unlikely to crop up in the liberal commentary is: Since all the profits of the 'war on terror' are pocketed by a few private corporations, shouldn't the costs (according to the rules of 'free market') be paid for by the same corporations?

Of course, I know that's not going to happen. It is still just too pathetic that the liberals would have problems with 'our' workers being denied a decent subsistence based on blood money. But these same liberal commentators have been parroting the mantra of free trade and freedom of capital to fly where it will, and the freedom of the invisible hand of the market to do as it wishes. Now they cry, "All our good jobs are being shipped out!"

Bulletin: These are about the last of the 'good jobs'; the battle was lost a long time ago. Just in the context of last generation's history, labor misleaders who supported (and may still do) Clinton(s) are now merely getting their due for going along with the Clinton administration, even as he was pushing NAFTA all those years ago. And they would be even more foolish now to believe that a Clinton or an Obama administration would abandon NAFTA, the WTO, or any other not-so-free trade deals in the works.

According to an article on Political Affairs Magazine website (Did John McCain's Lobbyist Ties Help Scuttle Boeing Tanker Deal? March 12, 2008), International Association of Machinists' General Vice President "Rich Michalski blasted the Bush administration, saying, 'President Bush and his administration have denied real economic stimulus to the American people and chose instead to create jobs in Toulouse, France.'"

Let us not overlook the fact that, by implication, the same union vice president would have no problems with an imperialistic economic setup that would provide his fellow machinists, and all their future offspring, endless employment; as long as the jobs stayed here. As a human born in the Third World -- that world which has been receiving the ugly end of the shaft fathomed by the Western defense industries -- I am quite content, nay, giddily ecstatic whenever workers in such industries lose their jobs. I for one hope they never find any work in death related 'fields.' I wish such 'fields' dried up all together. These 'fields' are sick.

To those leftists and labor leaders outraged at this deal, here is a suggestion. It is way past time that those about-to-become-ex-machinists, and millions more in other trades and industries, along with their union leaders and other ideological representatives woke up to the fact that imperialism does not particularly care about the well-being of 'its' workers.

What the imperialists do care about is having access to the materiel they need in a way that is the cheapest, most efficient and comes with the least possible maintenance cost. Since the American capitalists have been shipping larger shares of manufacturing and its related research and development to other countries, they cannot compete nimbly with the Europeans, because Americans are working with depleted (not rich) infrastructures.

It is established knowledge that even in its heyday American capitalism was not that efficient in its manufacturing department; the only reason the U.S. capitalist could brag after World War II and into the '60s was due to the fact that, unlike other major industrial powers in Europe and Japan, the US physical infrastructure had not been utterly destroyed by the war. The post-industrially depleted infrastructure now, however, combined with an overworked, financially maxed-out workforce, means American manufacturing will continue to decline in competitiveness within the world capitalist order. Ergo, this contract to build better flying gas stations that went to a French company, which reportedly knows how to make them better.

Of course, we must also not forget the political dimension, which as Althusser taught us, could over-determine other dimensions. As suggested by others (e.g. by Paul Craig Roberts), the contract very likely was granted to EADS as a favor to the Europeans, and particularly to a Sarkozified France, for their embrace of the current regime of imperialist division of labor.

In either case, it is past time that American workers realized that their state is not a benevolent institution at the service of the people, and started seeing it as a predator on their lives and a protector only of a class of leeches, bent on screwing the world; a state there to protect itself and its puppet masters. And if that protection takes millions of laid off workers, and the complete evaporation of rights and quality of life of tens of millions more; if, in the pursuit of imperialist objectives, efficiency and cost cutting may necessitate up to millions of lost jobs and lives in 'their' own country, so be it. The bosses don't mind it a bit.

That's the way things are. What are you going to do about it?

What does the eradication of military-based industrial jobs in the U.S. mean for the American workers and ordinary citizens? Isn't it very strange to have a situation in which we end up complaining about the 'horror' of job losses in an industry that causes so much death and destruction? It seems to me like a sick predicament to have.

As far as we Third World lesser people are concerned, unfortunately there still exist hundreds of thousands too many First World workers, from technicians to the highest scientific echelons in North America, Europe, Japan, and Israel (and a few other wannabe, weasel states), who continue to flourish in the 'defense' industries, and whose careers, trades, and fields will be nourished by the blood of millions of black, brown, yellow and red people.

If you are one of those laid off workers, pray that your livelihood will never again depend on destroyed lives. I don't mean to be presumptuous, but as a machinist you clearly have a lot of practical intelligence and creativity. Surely there are needs in your community that can benefit from the creativity that you (as well as your fellow machinists, with whom you can form cooperatives) possess.

In the general scheme of things, you haven't seen yet a thousandth of the misery imperialism can unleash on lives. Realize now or perish lacking the knowledge that the cause of our misery and the cause of your misery have the same name: imperialism. And that cause is not going away as long as you align yourself with the Democrats, who are some of the most cunning imperialists. Stop talking to the Democrats, and for your own sake stop begging the Pentagon for jobs; how low are you willing to go?

Build your own party and start living!

Reza Fiyouzat can be reached at:

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Latest Headlines
Lucky Larry wants $12.3 billion more for 9/11
All men are not equal
It�s the (predatory) economy, stupid!
Arabia: dream or reality?
Bad business for America
Where are the Iraqis in the Iraq war?
Economic cycles and political trends in the United States (Part I)
�Merit the sacrifice� for whom?
All you need is hate
Patriots, come forth and save America
Was polonium-210 being smuggled for a dirty bomb?
The science of terror
Palestinians need a powerful advocate
Israel: Time to boycott, divest and sanction
Setting up Russia or Iran to blame for a dirty bomb in America's future?
Moscow�s new chief ideologist: Ivan Demidov
The cost of war in plain English
Welcome to the United States of Resentment!
The coming uncertain war against Iran
Boeing or EADS? Don't give a damn!