The United States political process bears an uncanny
resemblance to a Hollywood production. Elections and speeches are scripted to
the letter, politicians put on a tirelessly rehearsed act, catering endlessly
to the whims of the target audience. A successful Hollywood filmmaker can't
afford to risk raising issues in a way that don't immediately reflect audience
sympathies. Good politicians vying for votes are similar in that they speak
according to the already existing expectations -- and prejudices -- of the
voting public.
Rarely do candidates stand behind a podium without amending
or overriding their personal beliefs in return for generating applause. You
would hardly hear, for example, of a US presidential candidate getting booed by
an audience.
Candidates do not bring fresh principals to the table, but
instead shape their views based on what national and local polls tell them
matters to the voting public. And what matters is largely manipulated by the
media and the state. Their combined scare tactics convinced most Americans of
outright falsehoods, such as Saddam's ties to 9/11, his stockpiles of WMD, the
"liberation" of women in Afghanistan, and so forth.
In a healthy democracy, the media is expected to represent
the interests of the people -- all the people, while the government serves as a
conduit to carry and defend these interests without violating the constitution.
But in the age of evangelical fanatics, lobby groups, international
corporations and lucrative Iraq contracts, democracy itself can be placed on
hold.
Indeed, maintaining the image of a democracy while violating
its genuine principles has consumed the efforts of successive US administrations.
No other administration, however, has compromised the interest of the American
people and flouted the constitution as much as the brazen Bush administration.
No wonder Republicans were squarely defeated in the congressional elections of
2006. Americans clearly voted for change, but change in a system so skilfully
corrupt doesn't come easy. The way in which Democrats supported the recent
spending bill for 2008, their vacillating stance on Iraq, and their downright
hawkish stance on Iran say volumes about their contribution to maintaining the
status quo.
Democrats are also bound by the rules of the game. They need
the money, media coverage and lobbyists. Currently there are 35,000 registered
federal lobbyists representing all sorts of special interests, including
foreign powers such as Israel, whose collaborative role in the Iraq fiasco is
too blatant to overlook.
Barack Obama, who does indeed have little experience of
understanding how the system works still possesses a talent for pleasing the
crowd. Thus his initial assertion that lobbyists "won't work in my White
House". Then, possibly after being told by his campaign managers that
special interests are more influential than the rest of the country, he tweaked
his vow slightly whereby lobbyists "are not going to dominate my White
House." Although his pledge changed its substance almost entirely, he was
able to receive victory in Iowa.
For now, analysts can extract temporary comfort from the
prevailing interpretation of the Iowa caucuses' results. Obama won the
Democratic caucus with 37 percent because he was the only candidate that
managed to present a truly new message -- that he and only he can advocate real
"change." As for former Arkansas governor, Republican Mike Huckabee,
he was the best possible candidate to represent the Republican voters'
conservative concerns. The former Baptist pastor is the rising star of the
Christian evangelicals who boast 40 million followers, all tied by an
outrageous message of doomsday.
Rev Stan Moody of the Christian Policy Institute, writes,
"Huckabee is a Rapturist" in reference to the mid-19th century
interpretation of biblical text which culminated in 1909 as the Scofield Desk
Reference Bible. This envisions -- and not metaphorically -- a Greater Israel
as a precondition to the return of Christ, who, with the true Christians, will
defeat Satanic forces, convert 144,000 Jews and exterminate the rest. It has no
Harry Potter twists, but it puts Hollywood horror movies to shame. The actual
concern is that this group has cultivated an alliance with the Israeli
government since the late 1970s and is a major power broker in US foreign
policy in the Middle East.
In her article, which appeared in The Jerusalem Post on 3
January, Hilary Leila Krieger reported from Iowa that Huckabee "has also
been staunchly supportive of Israel, writing in Foreign Affairs that, 'I will
not waver in standing by our ally Israel.' It is a country he has visited
several times, leading groups there as well as taking his family."
According to the same article, "Huckabee has drawn on
his experience in the Holy Land in making his pitch to voters, which has
especially resonated with evangelicals."
With the notable exceptions of Republican Ron Paul and
Democrat Dennis Kucinich, most visible presidential candidates were eager to
compromise the interest of their country to guarantee that of Israel's. Clinton
and Obama exemplify this. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) wrote,
"Obama has always enjoyed strong Jewish support since entering state politics
in Illinois in 1996, although some in the pro-Israel establishment are wary of
his calls to negotiate with rogue states such as Syria and Iran." JTA, of
course, nonchalantly substitutes the word 'Zionist' for
'Jewish', but that's another story.
While supporting Israel, right or wrong, is business as
usual for US politicians, Huckabee's advent -- described as the "second
coming" of Ronald Reagan by a producer at an Iowa TV station, is the truly
alarming trend. He cannot simply be dismissed as a lunatic Armageddonist who
thinks that he can win an election; he actually captured the Republican
endorsement in Iowa.
Huckabee knows well how to carry the momentum to the next
destination -- he needs to keep up the religious fervour, as narrow-minded and
irrational as it may be. We are told that this is what voters are expecting. To
win, like a good filmmaker, Huckabee must deliver.
Life can indeed resemble the movies, but in the case of US
elections the movie has become so familiar and predictable that it's no longer
even entertaining.
Ramzy
Baroud is a Palestinian-American author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has
been published in numerous newspapers and journals worldwide. His latest book
is The
Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People�s
Struggle (Pluto
Press, London). Read more about him on his website: ramzybaroud.net.