When President Bush announced �Mission Accomplished,� and the end of the war in May 2003, he also said we would help the citizens of Iraq rebuild their country. �Now that the dictator�s gone,� he stated, �we and our coalition partners are helping Iraqis to lay the foundations of a free economy.�

Apparently he was referring to the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) that took up residence in Saddam�s luxurious palace in May 2003, with the newly appointed king, Paul Bremer. The CPA was granted the authority to award reconstruction contracts in Iraq and it used that authority to implement what will go down in the history books as the most blatant war profiteering scheme of all time.

In large part, the masterminds of the reconstruction disaster that would occur after the CPA took over Iraq were Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith.

But to ensure control of the contracting process on the ground in Iraq, Bush filled the top slots of the CPA with administration cronies. For instance, a friend of Dick Cheney�s, Peter McPherson, took a leave of absence as president of Michigan State University to serve as Bremer�s economic deputy.

The leader of the CPA�s private development sector was Thomas Foley, an old college classmate of Bush, who served as finance chairman for his presidential campaign in Connecticut and also raised more than $100,000 for Bush.

Relatives of administration officials were also given jobs, such as Ari Fleischer�s brother Michael, and Simone Ledeen, the daughter of Michael Ledeen. Cheney�s daughter Liz, also did a short stint. However, it should be noted that none of them lounged around for too long in what soon became a hellhole in Iraq.

On May 16, 2003, the CPA issued its first regulation and described its authority in no uncertain terms stating, �The CPA is vested with all executive, legislative, and judicial authority necessary to achieve its objectives, to be exercised under relevant U.N. Security Council resolutions, including resolution 1483 (2003), and the laws and usages of war.  This authority shall be exercised by the CPA Administrator.�

With one swipe of the pen, Bremer granted himself the authority to run the government ministries, appoint Iraqi officials and award contracts for reconstruction. Next he fired 500,000 Iraqis, most of them soldiers, but pink slips also went out to many doctors, nurses, teachers and other public employees as well.

For the most part, the CPA financed its activities with billions of dollars that belonged to the Iraqis. On May 22, 2003, a UN Security Council resolution directed the proceeds from Iraqi oil to be placed in a development fund, and the CPA was granted authority to control the fund and decide which profiteers would get contracts.

During the year that Bremer controlled the purse strings, the Iraqi Development Fund received $20.2 billion, including $8.1 billion from the UN�s oil-for-food program, $10.8 billion from Iraqi oil, and the rest from repatriated funds, vested assets and donations.

The CPA accounting system was cash and carry and a steady stream of cash was flown into Bagdad from the US. Inspector General, Stuart Bowen later said that he knew of one $2 billion flight.

A report released by the House Government Reform Committee in February 2007 shows that in the 13 months that Bremer ruled, from May 2003 to June 2004, the Federal Reserve Bank in New York shipped nearly $12 billion in cash to Iraq.

One can only imagine the bank service charges associated with these shipments because to accomplish this feat, according to the Democratic chairman of the Reform Committee, Henry Waxman, the cash weighed 363 tons and the bank had to count and pack 281 million individual bills, including more than 107 million $100 bills, and then load them onto wooden pallets to be shipped to Bagdad on C-130 cargo planes.

Inspector Bowen later said that he determined that some of this cash went to pay salaries for thousands of �ghost employees� and Iraqi civil servants who did not exist.

Within a few months of the CPA�s arrival in Iraq, reports of corruption in the contracting process began appearing in the media. A British adviser to the Iraqi Governing Council told the BBC that officials in the CPA were demanding bribes of up to $300,000 in return for contracts.

Reports of flat out-fraud remained steady throughout Bremer�s reign in Iraq. One audit showed that the CPA Ministry of Finance could not provide documentation for about $17 million spent on employee salaries in February 2004, and a CPA advisor to the Ministry of the Interior said the ministry was paid for 8,602 guards but only 602 could be verified.

A CPA advisor to the Ministry of Finance was so concerned about payroll corruption that he submitted a formal complaint that stated in part: �Of the 1.6 million government employees currently on payroll, credible estimates put the number of ghost workers at somewhere between 250,000-300,000 employees.�

An October 2004 audit performed for the International Advisory and Monitoring Board, created by the UN to monitor the spending of Iraqi money, found one case where a payment of $2.6 million was authorized by a CPA senior adviser to the Ministry of Oil, and auditors were unable to obtain an underlying contract or any evidence that the services had been rendered.

The auditors in this group found 37 cases where files could not be located for contracts worth $185 million. In another 52 cases, a total of $87.9 million had been paid, but there were no records that goods had been received.

People on the ground in Iraq said that doing business with the CPA was reminiscent of the Wild West. Former CPA employees told a congressional committee that sacksful of cash were tossed around like footballs. Franklin Willis, showed pictures of himself and others holding up bundles of $100 notes totaling $2 million, which he said was used to pay the contractor, Custer Battles. �We told them to come in and bring a bag,� Willis said.

He also testified that millions of dollars in $100 bills were stored in the basement of the CPA offices and distributed to favored contractors with little accounting discipline. For instance, in the year that the CPA ruled, Custer was awarded contracts worth more than $100 million.

Two former Custer employees ended up filing a lawsuit under the Federal False Claims Act, saying Custer had swindled $50 million from the CPA with scams like double-billing for salaries and repainting the forklifts found at the Baghdad airport and then leasing them back to the US government.

The employees said the CPA paid Custer $15 million to provide security for Iraq�s civilian airline, when no services were needed because the airline was grounded during the time covered by the contract.

These employees said they kept informing the CPA about Custer�s fraudulent conduct for more than a year and when they asked why the firm continued to get contracts, they were told: �Battles is very active in the Republican party, and speaks to individuals he knows in the White House almost daily.�

In June 2004, the Government Accounting Office estimated that more than $1 billion had been wasted due to illegal overcharges by contractors since the war began. A later audit by the Iraqi government found that as much as $1.27 billion was lost to accounting irregularities between June 2004 and February 2005.

In a November 3, 2005, interview on National Public Radio, Inspector Bowen cited two examples of poor oversight where $28 million was paid to build five power plants and $1.8 million was paid to rebuild a library, but the work was never performed and the money �simply disappeared,� he said.

A recent report by Bowen says DynCorp was paid $43.8 million for a residential camp for police training personnel, but it has been empty for months and the company may also have billed $18 million in other unjustified costs.

About $4.2 million, he says, was improperly spent on 20 VIP trailers and an Olympic-size pool and an additional $36.4 million in spending for weapons such as armored vehicles, body armor and communications equipment that cannot be accounted for.

Not surprisingly, Cheney�s Halliburton remained the top profiteer under Bremer�s rule. A July 23, 2004, audit conducted by Bowen, showed the company had received 60 percent of all contracts paid for with Iraq money, including five no-bid contracts worth $222 million, $325 million, $180 million, and $194 million for the last two. In comparison, the audit showed that the CPA awarded only 2 percent of the reconstruction contracts to Iraqi companies.

In one example of blatant fraud, an audit found that Halliburton was charging for more than 41,000 meals a day for soldiers when only about 14,000 were served.

By the fall of 2003, the country was realizing that the rationale for war was based on lies and that the only ones drawing any benefits were the profiteers. So when Bush asked Congress for another $20 billion for the CPA, Bremer was summoned to Washington to explain where all the money was going and of course he testified in full stonewall mode.

Before the Senate Appropriations Committee on September 22, 2003, Bremer said the CPA had detailed records that could be audited by Congress. But when he testified before the House Armed Services Committee three days later he said the Office of Management and Budget was responsible for maintaining the CPA records and that Congress would have to go to the White House to access the records.

That arrogant assertion went over like a lead balloon with many members of Congress. Senator Robert Byrd said he was outraged over the inability to monitor CPA spending. �There is no reason why any arm of the executive branch charged with making such significant spending decisions,� he said, �should not be working directly with Congress.�

�When we�re talking about handing over another $20 billion to the CPA,� he said, �there is a real need for Congress to confirm that the CPA has its finances in order and that it is managing the taxpayer�s money responsibly.�

�We don�t even know how much of the $20 billion,� Byrd said, �will flow to government contractors in Iraq.�

�Whatever the amount is,� he noted, �we know that the size and scope of the profits being made will be enormous.�

�Former Bush Administration officials,� he warned fellow senators, �are even setting up consulting firms to act as middlemen for contractors hoping to take part in the bonanza.�

�Are we turning the U.S. Treasury into a grab bag for favorite campaign contributors to be financed at taxpayer expense?� he asked.

The answer was yes, and what a grab bag it was. Media reports revealed that Bush�s ex-campaign manager and Feith�s former law partner had set up consulting firms to profit from the war by lining up contracts for clients through their partners in crime within the CPA.

Other reports revealed that contracts worth $407 million were awarded to a firm called Nour that was formed less than two months after the war began. The names linked to the profits from Nour, among many others, included former Secretary of Defense William Cohen, Ahmad Chalabi, via a $2 million kickback; his nephew Salam Chalabi as the attorney handling the deal, and the money trail even led to the First Brothers, Marvin and Jeb Bush.

But Doug Feith the ringleader on the ground in Washington, had awarded a batch of no-bid contracts to a favored company the month before the war began, for the purpose of controlling the media in post-war Iraq.

In October 2003, the Center for Public Integrity obtained copies of seven contracts awarded to the San Diego-based Science Applications. The total value of the contracts was redacted but the Center was able to determine that they were all awarded in February 2003, and called for the work to be directed by Feith.

However, the center�s most stunning discovery was that when the contracts were awarded, Feith�s top deputy at the time, Christopher �Ryan� Henry, had been a senior vice president at SAIC until October 2002.

In addition, one of SAIC�s board members was Army General, Wayne Downing, who ran counterterrorism in the Bush administration for almost a year after 9/11, and had even gone to the CIA with Cheney to discuss intelligence on Iraq. Downing had also served as an advisor to Ahmed Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress, and was a well-known advocate for a war against Saddam.

Some of the SAIC contracts required that specific persons referred to as �executive management consultants� be hired and the pay range listed went as high as $209 and $273 per hour. The center said congressional sources estimated the value of the media contract as $38 million for the first year and as high $90 million in 2004.

SAIC had no special expertise to justify receiving these contracts. One company executive, quoted in the media, said the firm�s only credential for setting up an independent media, supposedly modeled after the BBC, was military work in �informational warfare�-signal jamming, �perception management,� and the like.

Under these contracts, the Iraq Media Network (IMN) was established and journalist Mark North, who covered the Iraq invasion for National Public Radio, was hired to train Iraqi journalists to report for the IMN.

In one of the many congressional hearings, North testified about the control of the IMN by the CPA and said CPA officials regularly directed and censored the activities of the news station and provided �a laundry list of CPA activities� to cover instead of stories about security or the lack of electricity and jobs

While testifying, he also described the CPA�s shabby treatment of Iraqi employees and its refusal to pay their wages. �For the first two months,� North said, �the local staff of about 200 journalists and technicians were not paid their salaries.�

When the staffers went on strike in attempt to get paid, he said, the CPA told the Iraqis to get back to work or the US Army would remove them from the studios.

The CPA had control of Iraqi money for one year between June 2003 and June 2004, but unfortunately no auditors arrived to take a look at the agency�s spending until April 2004, two months before the CPA�s rule was scheduled to end.

And as so often happens when it comes to giving solid advice or warnings, the senior senator from Virginia was absolutely right. It was far too late for audits, because the CPA and its gang of profiteers had already robbed the Iraqis blind.

The favored companies enjoyed a free-for-all. For instance, Halliburton said it had lost over $60 million worth of government property including trucks, office furniture and computers. Inspector Bowen reported that 6,975 items valued at $61.1 million were lost, and, in June 2005, the Defense Contract Audit Agency reported that the Halliburton had overcharged or presented questionable bills for close to $1.5 billion.

In the end, Bowen�s audit concluded that �the CPA�s internal controls for approximately $8.8 billion in DFI funds disbursed to Iraqi ministries through the national budget process failed to provide sufficient accountability for the use of those funds.�

As of February 2007, according to Bowen, audits of the CPA have resulted in 300 criminal and civil investigations, five arrests and convictions, and another 23 cases are currently under prosecution at the DOJ, and he is working on 76 on-going investigations.

One of the convictions involved Robert Stein, a former CPA comptroller and funding officer, who recently pleaded guilty to five felony counts, including conspiracy, money laundering, and bribery for stealing more than $2 million of reconstruction funds and taking more than $1 million in kickbacks to rig the bids on contracts that exceeded $8 million.

The whistleblower case against Custer Battle went to trial and a jury found that Custer had committed 37 acts of fraud and filed $3 million in false claims. It rendered a verdict with a $10 million penalty. However, the verdict was overturned by Republican appointed US District Court Judge TS Ellis III, who ruled that the CPA was not a US entity and therefore the false claims act does not apply to it.

In the ruling, the judge said Custer�s accusers �failed to prove that the U.S. government was ever defrauded. Any fraud that occurred was perpetrated instead against the Coalition Provisional Authority, formed to run Iraq until a government was established.�

Legal experts say this ruling is great news for the CPA and contractors because from now on anyone charged with any act of fraud related to the Iraqi money doled out by the CPA in Bagdad will use it in attempt to avoid civil or criminal prosecution.