Scientist and medical experts say that unless the
government forces the pharmaceutical industry to pay for the damage caused by
mercury-laced vaccines, in the not too distant future, Americans will
experience the worst welfare disaster in the history of this country.
No doubt with that
in mind, eight members of Congress are calling for a new investigation into the
link between the autism epidemic and the mercury-based preservative,
thimerosal, that children received in vaccines during the 1990s, and that some
children received as late as 2003.
After six years of
hearings, and testimony from medical experts, scientists, special education
teachers, school nurses, and parents of autistic children, several lawmakers
say they are convinced that a review of the vaccine database will show a causal
link between autism and thimerosal.
Throughout the
1990s, when thimerosal was most heavily used, the number of children diagnosed
with autism reached epidemic proportions. During this period, the levels of
mercury that children received were 120 times greater than safety standards set
for oral ingestion of mercury in food, according to the lawmakers.
In 1999, public health
officials began asking vaccine-makers to eliminate the preservative from
childhood vaccines. But seven years later, word got out that the preservative
is still in the flu vaccine recently added to the childhood immunization
schedule, and parents, medical experts, and scientists are outraged.
In seeking an
independent review, the lawmakers basically told the Centers for Disease
Control to butt out. They maintain that previous research conducted by the
agency is flawed because it "was based on data collected prior to the
removal of thimerosal and failed to explicitly compare the outcome of children
who received thimerosal-containing vaccines with those who did not," they
said.
The group has also
criticized the Institute of Medicine for its 2004 public announcement that
there is no link between vaccines and autism, because the conclusion for the
most part, was based on European studies, when American children had been
injected with 75 percent higher levels of mercury than the children in the
European studies were exposed to.
In March 2006, the
lawmakers sent a letter to the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, asking that agency to conduct a study of the CDC�s Vaccine Safety
Datalink, which contains records on 7 million children vaccinated since 1990.
�If the federal
government is going to have a study whose results will be broadly accepted,
such a study cannot be led by the CDC," the lawmakers wrote in the letter.
Although the debate
over the cause of autism may rage on indefinitely, the rising costs to society
of caring for and educating the children afflicted with the disorder cannot be
ignored.
On January 4, the Government
Accountability Office advised the Subcommittee on Human Rights and
Wellness Committee on Government Reform that the average per pupil cost for
educating a child with autism was estimated to be over $18,000 during the
1999-2000 school year, the most recent year in which data were available at the
time of the report.
That means that six years ago, the GAO�s estimate
for educating autistic children was nearly three times the cost of educating
normal students. The amount of money needed to educate autistic children is the
highest per pupil cost for children receiving special education services.
The epidemic does
not discriminate. It's happening in every state in the nation, due to the fact
that under the mandatory vaccine schedule, children in every state received the
same mercury-laced vaccines.
From December 1998 to December 2002, the autism
population in California�s Developmental Services System nearly doubled and the
97 percent increase in four years did not include children under 3, persons
classified with less common forms of autism, or persons who are suspected of
having autism but are not yet diagnosed.
The total number of autistic students served
statewide in�creased from 10,360 in December 1998 to 20,377 in December 2002.
Over the last six
years, the state of Ohio experienced more than a 1,000 percent increase in
students with autism, with 5,406 reported cases for the 2003-2004 school year,
according to the Ohio Legislative Office Of Education Oversight.
This year, the
Pennridge School District in Pennsylvania, expects to only receive about $1
million in federal funding, and only $2.8 million from the state, to cover its
$11 million special education budget. This means about 60 percent of the total
cost will have to be paid by local taxpayers.
In recent years, the average age of autistic
children entering the school system has shifted to much younger children. Under
federal law, public schools must provide appropriate education for all children
with disabilities, starting at age 3, and many autistic children remain in the
system until age 21.
For very young children, the recommendation for
early interven�tion has created an increased demand for more intensive
behavioral therapy and educational services in general. However, the federal
government only partially reimburses the states for the cost of educating
autistic children, even though early intervention means that the services
required for each child must now be provided for a much longer period of time.
And on the other hand, as more autistic children
reach late adolescence, the need for out-of-home residential ser�vices is
beginning to have a heavy impact on state budgets.
There is also an
increase in public health care costs associated with the growing number of
autistic children. For instance, according to state government records, South
Carolina has an estimated 2,000 children under the age of 18 with autism, and
the great majority of these children are eligible for at least some services
covered by Medicaid.
During the fiscal
year 2005, according to the Department of Health and Human Services, South
Carolina paid out more than $20 million for autism care, in large part because
most insurance companies do not cover the high cost of the specific therapies
that have been found to be the most successful in treating children with
autism.
A group of South
Carolina lawmakers are trying to pass a bill that would require private
insurers to cover services for all autism patients regardless of age. Industry
lobbyist Larry Marchant says that if passed, the bill would cause the health
insurance premiums that individuals or families pay to increase 25 percent, and
would average out to an extra $200 a month for those enrolled in family plans.
In addition, the
financial burden that a disorder like autism takes on families is absolutely
devastating. Upon becoming autistic after receiving vaccines at 16 months, Laura
Bono says her son, "Jackson's medical and therapy needs began taking every
bit of money we had saved or ever would have saved."
"The total we
have paid for Jackson's medical, nutritional and private therapy expenses so
far," Laura says, "is roughly $685,000 since August 1990."
That amount
averages out to well over $50,000 a year.
There is no escaping the fact that the epidemic is
having a profound impact on society; not only on autistic children and their
families, but on our public health care programs and school systems as well. And,
until vaccine-makers are held accountable, taxpayers will continue to carry the
full burden.
Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent
Media TV and an investigative journalist focusing on exposing corruption in government.