1. �Hidden Holocaust�
As we are all aware, the term �Holocaust� is traditionally
used to refer to the �systematic, bureaucratic state-sponsored persecution and
murder of approximately 6 million Jews by the Nazi regime during the Second
World War. The word �Holocaust� is a Greek word, which means �sacrifice by
fire.� It conveys an event, the scale and horror of which, transformed the
course of world history. Moreover, it�s often seen as a crime against humanity
that is unparalleled and unique.
This, we cannot dispute. The Nazi Holocaust was, indeed, a
uniquely horrific genocide, whose enormity and systematic character is barely
imaginable, designed to exterminate wholly the Jewish people, physically,
socially, culturally, from the face of the Earth.
But what then, do we mean by a �hidden holocaust?� This term
conveys the reality of a campaign of global homicide, murder, whose scale and
enormity is such that one feels that the word �holocaust� does, certainly
loosely speaking, apply. It is �hidden," in the sense that, although
experienced by millions of people around the world both historically and today,
it remains invisible, officially unacknowledged.
This �hidden holocaust," is escalating, accelerating,
intensifying; according to all expert projections from the social and physical
sciences, it may culminate in the extinction of the human species, unless we
take immediate drastic action, now.
2. �Civilizational Crisis�
We often hear the word �civilization." It�s often been
used to explain the dynamics of the War on Terror, as a clash between two civilizations, the advanced, developed and
progressive civilization of the West, and the backward, reactionary
civilization of Islam.
As is well known, the man who first formulated this idea as
an academic theory of international relations was the Harvard professor and US
government adviser, Samuel Huntington.
In early 2007, then Prime Minister
Tony Blair described the War on Terror as �a clash not between
civilizations," but rather �about civilization.� The War on Terror
is, he proclaimed, a continuation of �the age-old battle between progress and
reaction, between those who embrace the modern world and those who reject its
existence.� [�A
Battle for Global Values," Foreign
Affairs (January/February 2007)
But the �hidden holocaust� is not an aberration from our
advanced civilization that represents the peak of human development, requiring
only some reforms. Rather, the �hidden holocaust� is integral to the very
structure, values and activities of our civilization. It is part and parcel of
the �global values� of the international political and economic order that
underpins industrial civilization. And unless we attempt to transform the
nature of our civilization, we will all perish in a holocaust of our own
making.
3. The Genocidal Conception
of Civilization
The hidden holocaust associated with our modern
civilization, began at the beginning of modern civilization itself.
The origins of modern civilization can be found partly in
the pivotal voyages for European colonial expansion and trade from the 15th
century to the 19th centuries. Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, English and
other explorers ventured out from their home countries in search of new wealth
and new land in all corners of the globe. They went to the continents of
America, Africa and Asia and set up colonies and trading outposts.
Colonists and settlers had all sorts of intentions. Some of
them had capital, and were simply looking for new investment opportunities.
Others were trying to escape lives of hardship at home to make new lives for
themselves with a fresh start by settling in the colonies. Others wanted to
deliver the message of Christianity to native populations. Almost all of them
saw themselves as part of the inevitable historical momentum of progress,
bringing the fruits of European civilization to backward peoples.
Whatever the intentions, European expansion involved
massive, systematic violence. Violence of all kinds. Wholesale massacres,
forced labour camps, disease, malnutrition due to the imposed conditions of
economic deprivation, mass suicides due to depression and cultural alienation.
As Irving Louis Horowitz argues, for example, �the conduct of classic
colonialism was invariably linked with genocide.� [Genocide: State Power and Mass Murder, (New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction, 1976), p. 19-20.] Below we review some salient examples.
4. American Holocaust
Starting from 1492, when Christopher Columbus is said to
have discovered the Americas, the deadly conquest commenced. The complex
civilizations of native Americans, over the next few centuries, were
devastated. British historian Mark Cocker has reviewed reliable estimates of
the death toll:
�[E]leven million indigenous Americans lost their lives in
the eighty years following the Spanish invasion of Mexico. In the Andean Empire
of the Incas the figure was more than eight million. In Brazil, the Portuguese
conquest saw Indian numbers dwindle from a pre-Columbian total of almost
2,500,000 to just 225,000. And to the north of Mexico . . . Native Americans
declined from an original population of more than 800,000 by the end of the
nineteenth century. For the whole of the Americas some historians have put the
total losses as high as one hundred million.� [Mark Cocker, Rivers of Blood, Rivers of Gold: Europe�s
Conquest of Indigenous Peoples (New York: Grove Press, 1998), p. 5]
Although the majority of these deaths occurred due to the
impact of European diseases, disease alone does not explain the variations of
death toll rates in different parts of the Americas. The key factors in which
diseases operated were ultimately the kinds of repressive colonial social
formations imposed on natives by European invaders, consisting of different
matrices of forced labour regimes in mines and plantations, mass enslavement
for personal domestic use of colonists, religious and cultural dislocation, and
so on.
As David Stannard concludes in his extensive study of the
genocide, which he describes as an �American Holocaust," these factors
accelerated and intensified the mere impact of disease. He further describes
the colonists� strategic thinking:
�At the dawn of the fifteenth century, Spanish conquistadors
and priests presented the Indians they encountered with a choice: either give
up your religion and culture and land and independence, swearing allegiance �as
vassals� to the Catholic Church and the Spanish Crown, or suffer �all the
mischief and damage� that the European invaders choose to inflict upon you.�
[David Stannard, American Holocaust: The
Conquest of the New World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 255]
This binary choice, put to the Native Americans five
centuries ago, bears an unnerving resemblance to the rhetoric underpinning the War
on Terror today, �you are either with us or against us.�
5. African Holocaust
In Africa, the slave trade contributed substantially to the
protracted deaths of vast numbers of people. While slave structures had already
existed locally, it certainly did not exist on the vast scale it adopted in the
course of European interventions. English, French, Dutch, Spanish, Danish, and
Portuguese slave-traders started out by raiding villages off the West African
coast. The transatlantic slave trade, lasting from the 1450s to the 1860s,
consisted of �a series of exchanges of captives reaching from the interior of
sub-Saharan Africa to final purchasers in the Americas.� An observer at the
time, British journalist Edward Morel wrote: �For a hundred years slaves in
Barbados were mutilated, tortured, gibbeted alive and left to starve to death,
burnt alive, flung into coppers of boiling sugar, whipped to death.� [The Black Man�s Burden: The White Man
in Africa from the Fifteenth Century to World War I (New York: Modern
Reader, 1969)]
From the 16th to 19th centuries, the total death toll among
African slaves being in transhipment to America alone was as high as 2 million.
Although the many millions who died �in capture and in transit to the Orient or
Middle East� is unknown, among the slaves �kept in Africa some 4,000,000 may
have died.� Overall, in five centuries between nearly 17,000,000 -- and by some
calculations perhaps over 65,000,000 -- Africans were killed in the
transatlantic slave trade. [R. J. Rummel, Death
by Government (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1994)].
University of Essex sociologist Robin Blackburn has
demonstrated convincingly the centrality of capitalism to the growth of new
world slavery, arguing that the profits of slavery accumulated in the
�triangular trade� between Europe, Africa and America contributed fundamentally
to Britain�s industrialization. For instance, the profits from triangular trade
for 1770 would have provided from 20.9 to 55 per cent of Britain�s gross fixed
capital formation. [Robin Blackburn, The
Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern, 1492-1800
(London: Verso), p. 572.] The question of capital formation, however, is only
part of the story. The transatlantic slave trade was an indispensable motor in
an emerging capitalist world system under the mantle of the British empire. The
mechanization of cotton textiles, originally produced in American plantations
manned by African slaves, was overwhelmingly the driving force in British
industrialization. [CK Harley and NFR Crafts, �Cotton Textiles and Industrial
Output Growth," Warwick Economics
Research Paper Series (1994, no. 420)]
6. Indian Holocaust
In his landmark study, Late
Victorian Holocausts: El Ni�o Famines and the Making of the Third World
(London: Verso, 2001), historian Mike Davis shows how British imperial policy
systematically converted droughts in South Asia and South Africa into
foreseeable but preventable deadly famines.
In India, between 5.5 and 12 million people died in an
artificially-induced famine, although millions of tonnes of grains were in
commercial circulation. Rice and wheat production had been above average for
the previous three years, but most of the surplus had been exported to England.
�Londoners were in effect eating India�s bread.� Under �free market� rules, between
1877 and 1878, grain merchants exported a record 6.4 million hundredweight of
wheat to Europe while millions of Indian poor starved to death.
Crucially, Davis argues that these people died �not outside the modern world system, but in
the very process of being forcibly incorporated into its economic and political
structures. They died in the golden age of liberal capitalism; many were
murdered by the application of utilitarian free trade principles.�
7. Division of
the World
This violence was, therefore, not merely accidental to the
European imperial project. It was integral, systematic, as a solution to the
problem of native resistance.
Between about 1870 and 1914, European imperial policies
received a new lease on life, resulting in the intense scramble for control
over eastern Asian and African territories. Almost the entire world was divided
up under the formal or informal political rule of Britain, France, Germany,
Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, the USA, and Japan. Between themselves, in Africa
for instance they acquired 30 new colonies and 110 million subjects. African
resistance was brutally crushed. Consider, for example, the 1904 uprising of
the Hereros, a tribe in southwest Africa, against German occupation. The German
response was to drive all 24,000 of them into the desert to starve to death;
others who surrendered were worked to death in forced labour camps. [Thomas
Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa: White
Man�s Conquest of the Dark Continent, 1876-1912 (London: Random House,
1991).]
During this period, we can already see drastic inequalities
in the international system. By 1880, the per
capita income in the developed countries was approximately double that of
the �Third World.� By 1913, it was three times higher, and by 1950, five times
higher. Similarly, the per capita
share of GNP in the industrialized countries of the developed core was in 1830
already twice that of the Third World, becoming seven times as high by 1913.
[E. J. Hobsbawm, The Age of Empire,
1875-1914 (London: Abacus, 1987), p. 15]
In summary, for five hundred years, hundreds of millions of
indigenous peoples were slaughtered, decimated, deported, enslaved, starved,
exterminated, impoverished, and forcibly assimilated into an emerging world
system dominated by Western Europe. This
was how the global
values and politico-economic structures of our civilization came into being.
Globalization . . . the bloody legacy of a 500-year killing machine.
Nafeez
Mosaddeq Ahmed is executive director of the Institute for Policy Research & Development
and the author of "The London Bombings" (2006), "The War on Truth" (2005), "Behind the War on Terror" (2003)
and "The War on
Freedom" (2002).