Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 Progressive Press
 Barnes and Noble
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Jul 31st, 2006 - 00:32:16


Qana massacre again: Foreign and domestic enemies of our constitution
By Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Jul 31, 2006, 00:30

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

It is almost unbelievable that after the US sped delivery of guided bombs to Lebanon, Israel forces shelled civilians in Qana, the same city in Lebanon where they committed another massacre 10 years earlier (18 April 1996 shelling of a UN compound killing 106 civilians).

As in that incident, Western mainstream media, guided by pro-Israeli forces, failed to report the reality of what was happening on the ground before then. Only Reuters carried the statement nine days before (on April 9, 1996) of Israeli Maj.-Gen. Amiram Levine: "The residents in south Lebanon who are under the responsibility of Hezbollah will be hit harder, and the Hezbollah will be hit harder, and we will find the way to act correctly and quickly." So indeed residents were hit "harder". Yet, left-wing politician and architect of Israel's nuclear program Shimon Peres stated then with a straight face that the 1996 attack was simply a mistaken targeting.

The U.N. appointed military advisor Major-General Franklin van Kappen of the Netherlands to investigate the 1996 incident and he concluded that facts on the ground were at odds with the Israeli explanations given. Amnesty International's investigation concluded, without mincing words: "the IDF intentionally attacked the UN compound, although the motives for doing so remain unclear. The IDF have failed to substantiate their claim that the attack was a mistake. Even if they were to do so they would still bear responsibility for killing so many civilians by taking the risk to launch an attack so close to the UN compound."

Yet, Israel was never punished for that crime in Qana and the hundreds of other massacres going back six decades. Israeli historians now acknowledge for example that some 33 massacres of civilians occurred between November 1947 and May 1949 that helped precipitate the exodus of the Palestinian refugees. More crimes ensued since then and today over two-thirds of the native Palestinians were made refugees and displaced people, and Israeli Zionists increased their control of Palestine from 7 percent of the land in 1947 to over 90 percent today.

Now we are faced with another massacre in the same city of Qana and with a parroting of the same "explanations" used in 1996: "a regrettable mistake". So far, 54 are confirmed killed, including 37 children.

Unfortunately these never-ending "mistakes" are perpetuated using US weapons (violating the terms of the US Arms Export Control Act and Foreign Assistance Act). In the past two weeks alone over 500 civilians were killed in Gaza and Lebanon.

Our Congress and media, succumbing to the pro-Israel lobby, chose to close their eyes to the damage done to the US. The damages go beyond public image around the world (a majority of Europeans now think of the US and Israel as the most dangerous countries on earth). The damage also includes the foolish attack on Iraq (2,560 US killed, over 25,000 injured, $300 billion of our taxes spent so far). Each day we remain there over 100 Iraqis are also killed. A vast majority of Iraqis and even 70 percent of US servicemen and women want us to bring the troops home. Lest we forget, it was Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliot Abrams, David Wurmser and other neocons who argued (well before 9/11/2001) that an attack on Iraq would serve Israel.

It was these same neocons who support Israeli extremist political parties who violated constitutional protections with domestic wire taps, attacks on civil rights of Arab and Muslim Americans, infringement on academic freedoms, and allowing torture and imprisonment without trial.

When defending the constitution, we pledge to defend it against enemies both foreign and domestic. Isn't it time to challenge the domestic enemies of our constitution? Isn�t t time to realize the danger posed not just to the US but to the whole world (as Europeans and Latin Americans are now realizing)? Isn't it time to challenge the myth (found among the left and the right) that Israel serves US interests? Isn�t it time to stop delivering billions of our tax money to Israel (largest recipient of US foreign aid)?

Copyright © 1998-2006 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Skilling: An epitaph
The politics of delusion and crisis denial
American voters must not reward failure
Foreclosure USA
Degradation of democracy
Will Rogers delivers the Gettysburg Address
Chickenhawks in chief
Charnel house
Selling Satan: Iraqi war dead and the collateral damage to America's soul
What arrogance and stupidity?
Hitchens hitches his future to the Death Star
Political prestidigitation: The Illusion of a two-party system
The woman who would be speaker says, "Impeachment is off the table"
Putin gets mugged in Finland
Israel, Palestine and Canada
Godzilla vs. the Condoleezzard (Celebrating Halloween in the United States of Anxiety)
America is no longer free
The nuclear arms race and national sovereignty
One crime too many
Iraq's Orwellian calamity