Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 Progressive Press
 Barnes and Noble
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Jul 21st, 2006 - 00:44:26


Bush-Blair exchange: more �honey sweet� curiosities
By Larry Chin
Online Journal Associate Editor


Jul 21, 2006, 00:37

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

This is a follow-up to "Were plans for a Middle East war escalation exposed in Bush-Blair exchange?" (7/19/06), spurred by the input of Online Journal reader Ann Kroeber (thank you, Ms. Kroeber).

Ms. Kroeber correctly pointed out that more than one transcript of the Bush/Blair recording at G8 has been published, and cited the version from the BBC. I noted when the story broke, and suggested in my article, that inaccurate and conflicting versions are out there (perhaps by design). I worked off the Washington Post version, which seemed to be more complete than most.

That said, the BBC version does contain this curious passage, which has been blacked out of many US versions. It is audible on broadcasted versions that are out there. It goes as follows:

Blair: Look -- what does he think? He thinks if Lebanon turns out fine. If you get a solution in Israel and Palestine, Iraq goes in the right way.

Bush: Yeah, yeah, he is sweet.

Blair: He is honey.

Two issues:

  1. Who is the �he� that Bush calls �sweet,� and Blair calls �honey�? It came in the portion of the exchange after Blair asks, �Who? Syria?� and Bush responds, �Right.� Based on the context, I conclude that the �sweet honey� is Syrian president Bashar Assad. Or are they talking about someone else entirely? Perhaps Kofi Annan? Someone else?

    And how is this third party �sweet honey�? On a policy level, or a personal level?

  2. The passage that the BBC published as �If you get a solution in Israel and Palestine, Iraq goes in the right way� is �If we get a solution in Israel and Palestine, Iraq goes in the right way, he�s [inaudible]� in the Washington Post. The �honey� line by Blair is missing altogether in the Post version. Why?

Copyright © 1998-2006 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Skilling: An epitaph
The politics of delusion and crisis denial
American voters must not reward failure
Foreclosure USA
Degradation of democracy
Will Rogers delivers the Gettysburg Address
Chickenhawks in chief
Charnel house
Selling Satan: Iraqi war dead and the collateral damage to America's soul
What arrogance and stupidity?
Hitchens hitches his future to the Death Star
Political prestidigitation: The Illusion of a two-party system
The woman who would be speaker says, "Impeachment is off the table"
Putin gets mugged in Finland
Israel, Palestine and Canada
Godzilla vs. the Condoleezzard (Celebrating Halloween in the United States of Anxiety)
America is no longer free
The nuclear arms race and national sovereignty
One crime too many
Iraq's Orwellian calamity