The latest polls
say Americans now dislike Bush more than any other president, including even
Tricky Dick. It only took the public five and half year to see through him.
That said, I wonder
how long it will take people to accept the news that Bush never won either
election and the country is in such a mess that it will take 50 years to get
back to how it was when Bush took office.
According to Robert
Kennedy, Jr.'s, article in the June issue of Rolling Stone, "Republicans
derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush�s victory as nut cases in
can call me whatever they like because this nut case is finally going to weigh
in on this subject.
Bush needed Ohio.
He could not win the election without Ohio and he knew it.
So just as you
might expect with the Bush gang, voter fraud was rampant in Ohio, described as
"the critical battleground state that clinched Bush�s victory in the
Electoral College," by Mr Kennedy.
I can certainly
verify that allegation. I lived in Ohio at the time and I went to vote plenty
early before going to work and was there when the polls were supposed to open
at 6:30 am. I ended up standing out in the rain for an hour and 45 minutes and
when I got inside, voters had to track people down to explain what room or
voting machine to go to.
I lived in a
Democratic precinct by the way. But it was worse than that in other Democratic
precincts in other parts of the state.
Some people ended
up standing in line for up to 12 hours -- but only those people who could miss
work and go without pay for a whole day and not get fired for not showing up.
And as we all know, those people who could not wait in line were certainly not
I had never seen
anything like it in my life.
I knew Bush stole
the election by the time the polls closed in Ohio. I knew it because in working
for a major media outlet, by late afternoon I knew that all the exit polls had
Kerry winning. But by the time I left work to go home, the news channels were
saying "all the exit polls" are wrong. Yea right, all the exit polls
realize how impossible that would be?
I proceeded home to
watch the returns and I for sure knew that Bush stole the election the minute
the news programs showed him sitting with his family, pretending to be all
apprehensive when his face and body language told me that he somehow knew there
were no ifs about it, his second term was in the bag.
After that I went
to bed knowing that the damn thief had done it again.
It's worth noting
here, that there were no problems with the Republicans voting. No waiting in
line for hours or anything else. Check it out on the Internet by reviewing the
news articles in Ohio at the time, all went well in their neighborhoods.
In a nutshell, the
Bush gang expects us to believe that all the screw-ups in Ohio and elsewhere
just happened to weigh against Kerry.
Check this out. A
Republican precinct, in a church no less, in Miami County, Ohio, recorded a 98
percent percent turnout, while a Democratic polling center in inner-city
Cleveland recorded only a 7 percent percent.
And the Republicans
really pulled a fast one in Warren County, when GOP election officials
fabricated a nonexistent terrorist threat to bar the media from monitoring the
But there were
shenanigans going on everywhere. In what Mr Kennedy describes to "be the
single most astounding fact from the election, one in every four Ohio citizens
who registered to vote in 2004 showed up at the polls only to discover that
they were not listed on the rolls, thanks to GOP efforts to stem the
unprecedented flood of Democrats eager to cast ballots."
election, a New York Times' analysis found that new registrations in Democratic
strongholds were up 250 percent, compared to only 25 percent in strong
And top that off
that with the outright fraud that shows that upwards of 80,000 votes for Kerry
in one county were counted for Bush instead. "That alone is a swing of
more than 160,000 votes," says Mr Kennedy, "enough to have put John
Kerry in the White House."
A few comments on
the exit polls from the Rolling Stone article give a clear picture of this
impossibility of Bush winning and all the polls being wrong.
On the evening of
the vote, Mr Kennedy says reporters at each of the major networks were briefed
by pollsters at 7:54 p.m. Kerry,
they were told, had an insurmountable lead and would win by at least 309
electoral votes to Bush�s 174, with 55 too close to call.
In London, Mr
Kennedy says, Prime Minister Tony Blair went to bed contemplating his
relationship with Kerry.
"As the last
polling stations closed on the West Coast, exit polls showed Kerry ahead in ten
of eleven battleground states," Mr Kennedy says, "including
commanding leads in Ohio and Florida -- and winning by a million and a half
polls," he explains, "even showed Kerry breathing down Bush�s neck in
supposed GOP strongholds Virginia and North Carolina."
Against these odds,
experts say, the statistical likelihood of Bush winning was less than one
chance in 450,000. According to the father of modern polling, Lou Harris: �Ohio
was as dirty an election as America has ever seen.�
�You look at the
turnout and votes in individual precincts," he told Mr Kennedy,
"compared to the historic patterns in those counties, and you can tell
where the discrepancies are."
out like a sore thumb,� he said. And let me tell you that it did stand out but
the mainstream media refused to hold the 'sore thumb' up for the public to see.
So how did the
Republicans explain this little matter? They said that Republicans were more
reluctant than Democrats to talk to the pollster when they went to vote.
Keith Oberman of
MSNBC was the only news person giving the election fraud story the attention
that it deserved, while the mainstream press was in its usual asleep at the
wheel mode, just as it has been since Bush took office.
And due to the
press not broadcasting the truth, the public apparently bought that ridiculous
line just like people bought the lies about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
and its alleged attempt to purchase yellow cake uranium from Niger that they
were spoon-fed by the press.
The Bush gang could
not have pulled half of the stunts they have gotten away since 1999, had the
people in the mainstream media been doing their job.
Evelyn Pringle is a
columnist for OpEd News and an investigative journalist focusing on exposing corruption in government.