United States laid ground for Ergenekon �Deep State� in Turkey
By Wayne Madsen
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Sep 17, 2010, 00:24
(WMR) -- WMR
has discovered a formerly
Secret document from the U.S. Department of State that confirms the United
States not only supported the Turkish military coup that ousted the nation�s
democratically-elected government in 1980 but actively supported the
military-imposed Turkish Constitution as �reformist.�
The citizens of Turkey recently voted in a referendum and
approved 26 constitutional amendments that will transform Turkey into a
democratic state without the threat of the military and national security
state-affiliated judiciary trumping the power of the Parliament and the people.
Neocons have condemned the referendum as a threat to secularism in Turkey and a
move to an Islamic state. However, the neocons and their allies in Israel are
concerned that a Mossad -and CIA-imposed Turkish �Deep State� has finally seen
its power largely destroyed with the impending adoption of a new
Turkish Constitution. The referendum, which passed with 58 percent of the vote,
is a victory for the Justice and Development Party (AKP) of Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Many of the roots of the creation of the most recent variant
of the Turkish Deep State, known as Ergenekon, can be seen in the State
Department policy paper dated September 5, 1981, and titled �USG Policy toward
Turkey.� When the State Department document was drafted, Turkey�s military
junta leader, General Kenan Evren, was drafting the present Turkish
Constitution. The 1981 Turkish military draft Constitution�s �reforms� were
referred to in the State Department policy document�s author Lawrence
Eagleburger, the Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs: �It is too
early to judge whether the fundamental GOT reforms, now in place or in
prospect, will succeed.� The document also talks about the �relief�
provided to the United States by the 1980 military coup: �The military takeover
of September 1980 brought temporary relief and for the moment broke the back of
radical movements -- including pro-Islamic ones -- which had come to the fore
in the 1970s.�
Eagleburger signaled his and the Reagan administration�s
support for the Turkish junta because of the same bogus reasons that neocons
today criticize the Erdogan government: the bogeyman of Turkish Islamic
political power. Eagleburger warned that Turkey could �drift away from NATO and
Western-style government; alignment with Middle East states which supply oil
and markets; possibly even neutralism growing out of accommodations with the
USSR.� Today, the neocons, Israelis, and their Ergenekon allies in Turkey argue
the same points in demonizing the Turkish government: that Turkey is drifting
from NATO, that it is turning to oil suppliers and markets like Iran, and has a
growing relationship with Russia.
Eagleburger then outlines how the Reagan administration
would cement U.S. ties with Turkey to prevent the above scenarios from being
realized. He writes: � . . . the Turkish-American relationship has no natural
constituency in terms of shared history, economic interdependence, ethic or
family ties. The absence of a �Turkish lobby� in the United States is
indicative.� Two of the recipients of the Eagleburger document would later
help fill the void and help create the American Turkish Council (ATC), a lobby
group patterned after their friends at the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC). Those two recipients of the Eagleburger document were
Richard Perle, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security
Policy, and Paul Wolfowitz, Director of Policy Planning at the State
Department. Other recipients of the Eagleburger policy document on Turkey included
Robert Hormats, the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business
Affairs [and who is now the Undersecretary of State for Economic, Business, and
Agricultural Affairs under Hillary Clinton]; Ronald Spiers, the director of the
State Department�s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, former U.S. ambassador
to Turkey from 1977 to 1980; and the prospective U.S. ambassador to Pakistan;
Richard Burt, the Director of Politico-Military Affairs for the State
Department; and Nicholas Veliotes, Assistant Secretary of State for Near
Eastern and South Asian Affairs.
The nature of the bilateral U.S.-Turkish relations were
described as a �best effort� to help Turkey in all respects, including an �understanding�
of Turkey�s position in Greek-Turkish issues and dealing with �Armenian
terrorism.� In 1981, Armenia was a constituent republic of the USSR. Today, it
is �Kurdish terrorism� that plagues Turkey since Armenia is now an independent
state with a natural and politically-powerful constituency in the United States.
The Eagleburger document describes the Evren junta as perceiving the Reagan
administration as making a �best effort� in providing financial support to
Turkey from Washington�s �weighing in� on the �International Monetary Fund, the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Saudis, and other
potential donors.�
Eagleburger also warns of �nettlesome� issues that could
adversely affect U.S. relations with the Turkish junta, for example, �Congressional
badgering on Cyprus, on relations with Greece, on the pace of return to
democracy, and an Armenian niche in the proposed Holocaust Museum.�
The United States, through an alliance with Israel and its
influence peddlers in Washington, would ensure that the Turkish pace of
democracy would not return to normal until the recent approval by the Turkish
people of a new constitution that will eradicate the Turkish junta�s military �reforms�
championed by Eagleburger and his band of proto-neocons in the Reagan
administration in 1981. Attempts over the past eight years by Ergenekon to
overthrow the AKP government failed and with the new constitutional changes,
Ergenekon�s and Israel�s ability to influence events in Turkish politics have
been curtailed, save for the continuing threat of covert Israeli provocation of
terrorism involving the Kurds.
Previously
published in the Wayne
Madsen Report.
Copyright � 2010 WayneMadenReport.com
Wayne
Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and
nationally-distributed columnist. He is the editor and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report
(subscription required).
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor