Zionism�s un-Christian Bible
By Maidhc
� Cathail
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Nov 30, 2009, 00:18
�For a nation to commit the sin of
anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment.� --The New Scofield Study Bible
The Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) campaign should
widen its scope to target non-Israeli companies who contribute significantly to
the oppression of Palestinians. As part of this broader strategy, priority
should be given to one of the most egregious offenders, the prestigious British
publisher, Oxford University Press (OUP). As unlikely as it may seem, the
world�s largest university press is responsible for one of the greatest
obstacles to justice for Palestinians -- The Scofield Bible.
Since it was first published in 1909, the Scofield
Reference Bible has made uncompromising Zionists out of tens of millions of
Americans. When John Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel, said
that �50 million evangelical bible-believing Christians unite with 5 million
American Jews standing together on behalf of Israel,� it was the Scofield
Bible that he was talking about.
Although the Scofield Reference Bible contains
the text of the King James Authorized Version, it is not the traditional
Protestant bible but Cyrus I. Scofield�s annotated commentary that is the
problem. More than any other factor, it is Scofield�s notes that induced
generations of American evangelicals to believe that God demands their
uncritical support for the modern State of Israel.
Blessing Israel
Central to Christian Zionist belief is Scofield�s commentary
on Genesis 12:3. For the sake of clarity, Scofield�s notes have been italicized
in the following passage:
��I will bless them that bless thee.� In fulfilment
closely related to the next clause,
�And curse him that curseth thee.� Wonderfully fulfilled in the history of
the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted
the Jew -- well with those who have protected him. The future will still more
remarkably prove this principle.�
Drawing on Scofield�s speculative interpretation, John Hagee
claims, �The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites
the wrath of God.�
However, as Stephen Sizer points out, in his definitive
critique, Christian Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon? �The promise,
when referring to Abraham�s descendants speaks of God blessing them, not of
entire nations �blessing� the Hebrew nation, still less the contemporary and
secular State of Israel.�
Apparently unaware of this more orthodox reading, The New
Scofield Study Bible, published by Oxford University Press in 1984, enhanced
Scofield�s interpretation, by adding, �For a nation to commit the sin of
anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment.� Reading such tendentious comments, a
bible-believing Christian could easily assume, for example, that God will
punish the 114 countries which endorsed the Goldstone Report.
�Sustained by a dubious exegesis of selective biblical
texts,� Stephen Sizer concludes, �Christian Zionism�s particular reading of
history and contemporary events . . . sets Israel and the Jewish people apart
from other peoples in the Middle East . . . it justifies the endemic racism
intrinsic to Zionism, exacerbates tensions between Jews and Palestinians and
undermines attempts to find a peaceful resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict, all because �the Bible tells them so.��
The incredible Scofield
In his 2008 book, The Rise of Israel: A History of a
Revolutionary State, Jonathan R.
Adelman describes the crucial support Israel receives from Christian
fundamentalists as �totally fortuitous.� The incredible career of the man who
wrote �the Bible of Fundamentalism,� however, casts considerable doubt on that
assertion.
Two years after Scofield�s reported conversion to
Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed.
Describing the former Atchison resident as the �late lawyer, politician and
shyster generally,� the article went on to recount a few of Scofield�s �many
malicious acts.� These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis, for which
he was sentenced to six months in jail.
Being a �born again� preacher, however, did not preclude
Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men�s club in 1901. In
his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield comments, �The
admission of Scofield to the Lotos Club, which could not have been sought by
Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has cropped up before, that someone
was directing the career of C. I. Scofield.�
That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of
the club�s committee members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As
Canfield intimates, Scofield�s theology was �most helpful in getting
Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of
Untermeyer�s pet projects -- the Zionist Movement.�
Others, however, have been more explicit about the nature of
Scofield�s service to the Zionist agenda. In �Unjust War Theory: Christian
Zionism and the Road to Jerusalem,� Prof. David W. Lutz claims, �Untermeyer
used Scofield, a Kansas city lawyer with no formal training in theology, to
inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy
and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the
latter�s career, including travel in Europe.�
Absent such powerful connections, it is hard to imagine
�this peer among scalawags� ever getting a contract with Oxford University
Press to publish his bible. Nevertheless, it remains a mystery why OUP chose to
endorse such a sectarian work.
Atonement
If there had been no Scofield Bible, American presidents influenced by
Christian Zionism, such as Truman, Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush, would
most likely have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently
more attentive to U.S. interests. Moreover, the American people might
have been spared the well-publicized pro-Israeli rants of John Hagee,
Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End
Times �prophecy� peddled by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye.
But it is the people of the Middle East who have suffered
most at the hands of an expansionist Israel, emboldened by the unswerving
allegiance of America�s Christian Zionists, who were led to believe that
Scofield�s words were God�s will.
Although much needless suffering has already been caused by
the Scofield Bible, perhaps it�s not too late for Oxford University
Press to publicly disavow its harmful book. Among its many victims are 3.5
million Palestinian refugees whose right to return is fervently opposed by
Christian Zionists, who believe that the land belongs exclusively to �God�s
chosen people.� At the very least, OUP could demonstrate remorse for its role
in promoting ethnic cleansing by compensating those refugees with the
considerable profits accrued over the past century from sales of its Zionist
bible.
Maidhc
� Cathail is a freelance writer. He has written for Antiwar.com, Dissident
Voice, Online Journal, OpEd News, Media Monitors Network, The
Palestine Chronicle and many other publications.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor