The ordeal of Mohammed Omer
By Kenneth Ring
Online
Journal Guest Writer
Jul 30, 2008, 00:20
We are used to hearing about the hazards, often fatal, of
being a journalist these days. Everyone is familiar with accounts of courageous
Russian journalists who have been assassinated and of course with stories of
war correspondents who have been killed or gravely wounded in the course of
reporting from Iraq and Afghanistan. But what about the dangers of just being a
Palestinian journalist who is simply trying to return to his own hometown in
Gaza after being abroad?
Consider the case of a 24-year-old reporter named Mohammed
Omer.
Some background first: For the past six years Mohammed has
been covering and reporting on the situation in Gaza and has published his
articles in various periodicals in Europe, for the Inter Press Service News
Agency and The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. His articles have
received much recognition and several awards, including, most recently, the
prestigious Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism, which was presented to
Mohammed in a special ceremony in London in June -- about which more in a
moment.
Mohammed and his family, like many Palestinians, have suffered
greatly because of the circumstances under which they live in Gaza. He himself
was nearly killed by a bulldozer in the course of photographing the demolition
of a neighbor�s house and one of his brothers did lose his life as a teenager
as a result of being shot by Israel Defense Forces on his way home from school.
Another brother was shot in the leg, which had to be amputated. Mohammed�s
father has spent 11 years in Israeli prisons where torture, as is well known,
is common. And in March 2003, Mohammed returned to his home after school to
find that he had it been demolished by an Israeli bulldozer. All his family�s
possessions -- books, photographs, all his own notebooks, everything -- were obliterated,
and he and his family suddenly found themselves homeless.
It is not an unusual family story for people living in Gaza;
on the contrary, one hears accounts like this all the time from the lips of
Palestinians.
Now fast-forward to June 2008. Mohammed has recently
received word that he is to be a co-recipient of the Martha Gellhorn Prize. For
this, he must go to London, but, as you know, it is not easy for any Gazan to
leave the prison that Gaza has become under the unrelenting Israeli siege. Only
after strenuous diplomatic efforts over several weeks by Dutch officials and a
prize-winning Australian journalist living in England was it possible for
Mohammed to leave Gaza to receive his award. While in Europe, Mohammed also
spoke in Sweden, the Netherlands and Greece about his work, in addition to
making a very moving acceptance speech in London during the ceremonies for the
Gellhorn Prize.
The return to Gaza was, however, also fraught with
difficulties. According to various reports in the press, as soon as Mohammed
had arrived in Amman, the Dutch diplomats who had facilitated his trip informed
him that the Israelis did not want him to return. However, after further
negotiations by his Dutch sponsors, Mohammed was finally allowed to enter
Israel via the Allenby Bridge on the morning of June 26.
That�s when the trouble began.
According to all the accounts I have read in the press
including several interviews with Mohammed himself, there he was interrogated,
strip-searched and brutalized by agents of the Shin Bet for several hours.
Mohammed says that his interrogators made fun of him saying, �Oh, so it�s you
who won the journalism award,� and repeatedly asked him where he had hidden his
prize money. After that, he was continually threatened at gunpoint, forced to
remove all his clothes, leaving him completely naked, and then beaten and
kicked for more than 10 minutes until he lost consciousness. He awoke to find
himself being dragged around the room by his feet, his head banging on the
floor, after which another Shin Bet officer pressed his boot upon Mohammed�s neck
while another painfully jabbed his fingers into his face. At this point, Mr.
Omer says, �I thought I was dying. I remained in a state of unconsciousness for
up to 90 minutes until a medical doctor, who was carrying an M-16, performed an
electrocardiogram on me.�
This bare summary of Mohammed�s ordeal hardly does more,
however, than give a kind of overall impression of his treatment and the rank
and wanton humiliation that was inflicted on him that seems to have been
motivated only by malice. Reading Mohammed�s own testimony, one can�t help
being reminded of the unchecked and unmonitored torture that was visited upon
Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib. To illustrate this, I will present some excerpts
from a recent interview with Mohammed conducted by Amy Goodman on her Democracy
Now! Program. At this point, a Shin Bet officer named Avi has taken Mohammed
into an empty room to continue his �interrogation:�
Avi took me inside a room, where he
asked me -- in an empty room, where he asked me, �Take off your clothes.� I
told him, �I�m not going to take off my clothes, because I have the Dutch
embassy waiting for me outside.� After some time, I had to take off my clothes.
He said, �Take off your T-shirt.� I take it off. I took off my jeans. I took
off my shoes and my socks. And then he�s coming to me -- he�s getting closer to
me, and then he says, �Take off your underwear.� I said, �I�m not going to take
off my underwear. There is an embassy waiting outside for me.� He said, �I know
that there is an embassy waiting for you. Take off your underwear.� I said,
�I�m not going to take it off.� Then he was putting his hand on his revolver
and kept looking at me. �Mohammed, take off your underwear,� he says. And then
I said, �I�m not going to take it off, because this is a humiliation. You�re
trying to humiliate me. It�s not security checking, because I went through the
security system like anyone else, and you are treating me differently.� And
then he said, �Take it off.� And then I said, �I�m not going to take it off.�
So he went down to my knees, where he pulled down my underwear to make me
totally naked. I looked at him, and then I told him, �OK? So what are you
trying to do here?� And he said, �Go right, go left.� I said, �I�m not going to
move right or left. I�m totally naked.� And then he started humiliating me and
laughing. And I continued explaining to him, �Why do you treat me that way? I�m
a human being, and I don�t deserve this kind of treatment.� Then he said to me,
�Well, still, you have seen nothing. You will see more.� He continued to
interrogate me and . . . search me, stripping and searching me while I was
totally naked. And then he told me, �Go and get your clothes on.� I put my
clothes on, and I went back to the hall where the travelers are coming.
There was of course �more,� as Avi had threatened. Later on,
after more ridicule, taunting and other forms of verbal intimidation, it starts
to get physical:
I collapsed during the interrogation. I
fainted and . . . I started vomiting everywhere. And then the soldiers, they
started gathering around me. I estimate nearly one hour and a half vomiting on
the ground. And one of the Shabak officers -- I was unconscious for most of the
time, but I can remember one of the things that they were doing to me. He was
using his [fingernails] and pinching me all the way, trying to cause me pain
under my eyes and under the soft part of my eye. I thought what these people are
doing is basically they are trying to torture me. And one of them who was
trying to do that, the same thing, pinching me using his [fingernails] under my
ears, and then one other of them . . . put his shoes on my neck. I could feel
actually the outline of his shoes on my neck, moving right and left.
I started vomiting again and again, especially after one of the soldiers had
both his two fingers inside the hole between my neck and my chest. There is a
little hole, and he put it all the way inside and tried to grab my bones, to
grab me from my bones different times. That was the most painful thing. And
then, [the] other one who was trying to put his hands on my chest and all his
weight on my chest. He was -- it was actually meant to break me and to break my
ribs, because he put all his weight. And the man who continued . . . to put his
feet and his shoes on my neck, that can�t be first aid at all. When I told the
doctors here in Gaza what happened to me, they said that can�t be first aid, it
can�t be something like that; that�s torture.
Mohammed�s account of his treatment goes on, as I indicate
in my summary account above, but you have read enough to get the flavor of this
�interrogation.� In any case, eventually Mohammed was dragged off, still only
half conscious, to an ambulance and taken to a hospital in Jericho following
which he was transported by Dutch diplomats to a hospital in Gaza where doctors
determined that several of his ribs had been cracked. Mohammed was hospitalized
for five days after his assault and is still recovering from his injuries and
trauma. His voice remains weak and hoarse, and he still seems emotionally
broken from the incident. As he told one interviewer, �I�m emotionally
destroyed. I have nightmares. I have never experienced such humiliation. They
stripped and made fun of me. . . . If I weren�t a Palestinian, if only I had a
different passport, they would never have done that to me.�
The latest word I have heard from those who are close to
Mohammed is that he needs an operation. It is not clear exactly for what, but
one of his friends has written that it is because of where they had kicked him.
He said it was in a sensitive area so I am assuming it is in the groin.� I
think we can surmise just where Mohammed was kicked.
Of course, the Israelis deny that any unusual security
procedures were involved in Mohammed�s interrogation, and that �the person in
question received decent treatment and no extraordinary measures were taken
against him. After the body search . . . the person in question lost his
balance and fell for some unknown reason. . . .�
Needless to say, no one, and certainly no one who has talked
with Mohammed, believes this. Such denials are standard practice and are
risible on their face.
As you can imagine, there has been a widespread sense of
outrage over this incident and various protests have already been lodged by
friends of Mohammed and concerned journalists everywhere. Dutch MP Van Baalen
has demanded an investigation and an open letter has been sent to the Israeli
ambassador to the U.K., Ron Prosor, asking him to launch an investigation into
the matter. Meanwhile, in America, The Washington Report for Middle East
Affairs has circulated a petition on Mohammed�s behalf, which has already
garnered thousand of signatories demanding redress, and Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice�s office has agreed to a meeting. In addition, the Consul
General of the San Francisco Israeli consulate has been advised of this matter
and has offered to meet about it. At the very least, if the results of these
inquiries establish the veracity of Mohammed�s claims, as few doubt they will,
then the Israeli government should be required to issue an apology to Mohammed
and to compensate him for his injuries, although of course none of that will repair
his broken ribs or his damaged �groin,� much less undo the trauma and
humiliation that he suffered as a result of the thuggish actions that its
operatives perpetrated on him.
Even though Mohammed has been deeply wounded, physically and
psychologically, by the ordeal that I have described, he is determined not to
allow the insults he has suffered at the hands of these Israeli agents to
intimidate him or keep him from his work, no matter what the consequences.
As he told Amy Goodman: �Well . . . they can kill me. I
thought that the fact that I�m being given this international prize was going
to bring me protection, but who cares? Israel doesn�t care. . . . I mean, will
Israel care [about] killing a journalist? Of course not. . . . Will they care
[about killing] Mohammed Omer? Of course not.�
As long as Mohammed lives, they will not succeed in killing
his voice either. He will continue to speak out against injustice and to report
the facts in Gaza, once he is able to work again. As it states in his Gellhorn
Prize citation, �Every day, he reports from a war zone, where he is also a
prisoner. His homeland, Gaza, is surrounded, starved, attacked, forgotten. He
is a profoundly humane witness to one of the great injustices of our time. He
is the voice of the voiceless.�
Mohammed told another interviewer that he was calling on his
colleagues around the world to condemn in the strongest words the �criminal and
disgraceful Israeli behavior,� which �only befits criminals and thugs, not
states, let alone states that claim to be civilized, western and democratic.�
As is well attested by human rights organizations and many
witnesses, flagrant abuses like those which were inflicted upon Mohammed occur
routinely to Palestinian citizens at the hands of Israeli soldiers and have
been going on for many years. Most of the victims of this kind of brutality,
which can only inflame hatred because of its capricious cruelty, are ordinary
people who have no one to speak up for their defense, so reports of this sort
of thing often leave no trace except on those who are the victims of it. But in
this case, Mr. Omer is a highly respected journalist who has many friends
throughout the world, and because of that, there will rightly be a �stink� made
about this incident, and it will not forgotten, any more than it will by
Mohammed himself.
In fact, in the last communication I have received from one
of his close friends, Mohammed made it clear that he wanted his friends and
allies around the world �not to give up fighting for the safe passage of
Palestinians� and that his own case not be forgotten since it provides such a
clear instance of what can happen to any Palestinian, especially one who has a
record of speaking out against injustice, when such routine protections can no
longer be counted on.
Which is why those of us who have been especially concerned
with this incident want to do all we can to continue to publicize it until
justice is done, both to Mohammed and to all Palestinians. In this effort, we
hope you will also see fit to make your voice heard.
Kenneth Ring, Ph.D., is a professor emeritus of
psychology, University of Connecticut, who currently resides in the San
Francisco Bay Area. His e-mail is Ken_Ring@Compuserve.com.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor