International narcotics agenda behind Myanmar instability
By Larry Chin
Online Journal Associate Editor
Sep 28, 2007, 01:05
For the past month, the military government of Myanmar has
been the focus of increasingly strident demonstrations, resulting in violent
military crackdowns in recent days. What must be noted is the Bush
administration's open support for the dissidents, in conjunction with
growing international (Western) support behind a coup attempt, and the likely
parapolitical goals behind this agenda.
The demise of the Golden Triangle: bad for
business
According to a report by Thomas Fuller of the International
Herald Tribune, the Golden
Triangle has, in recent years, lost its prominence as a narco-region. In fact,
the legendary Triangle now accounts for as little as 5 percent of world opium
supply, according to some estimates. [Notorious
Golden Triangle loses sway in opium trade, Thomas Fuller, International
Herald Tribune, September 11,
2007]
Not surprisingly, the Golden Crescent and Afghanistan,
now under control of the US and its drug-intelligence proxies, are by far and
away the world�s number one opium suppliers, as well as the top overall drug
producing region, dwarfing Colombia and the Golden Triangle.
In fact, the demise of the Golden Triangle in recent years
can be traced to geostrategic developments that run counter to the agenda of
international interests whose financial and banking system depends on the
multi-billion dollar cash flows of the criminal drug trade.
As noted by Fuller:
1. The United Nations credits Myanmar�s central government
for leading opium eradication.
2. Militias with long-standing ties to the heroin business
have also pushed eradication.
3. China has played a major role pressing opium growers to
eradicate.
4. The Laotian government has led its own opium eradication
campaign. Officials see the link between poverty and opium, and the fact that
�it is mostly organized crime syndicates that profit.�
These narco-developments, parallel with 1) other
financial and political reasons why a new Mynamar government would be
preferred; 2) a fragile
and teetering world economy facing numerous financial bubbles and insolvency;
and 3) continued failure to control either the Middle East or contain the
rising political and economic power of China, cast a different light on the
sudden burst of interest on the part of the Bush administration to back a coup
or regime change in Myanmar.
The Bush administration, the epitome of criminal political
power, does not support �human rights.� It will utilize every means, including
overt military force, to protect geostrategic interests that depend on the
world drug trade.
The
revitalization of the Golden Triangle drug trade, and the installation or
support for an openly pro-US regime in Myanmar, benefits Western financial
interests. Any geostrategic foothold in Southeast Asia also benefits efforts to
contain China.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor