Lackluster �300�: Artistic adventurism or cultural terrorism?
By Shirzad Azad
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Mar 29, 2007, 01:09
The
West has had a long history of designating other nations as backward and itself
as a great civilization and the model of progress. As the leader and the top
representative of the Western civilization, the United States has
enthusiastically followed this tradition through its movie-making mafia,
Hollywood, and after bashing many other nations, including Africans, Indians,
Chinese, and Japanese, it has recently turned its attention to the Iranians.
It
is a bare fact that history is always written by the victors. Unfortunately,
due to a turbulent past not only other nations but also a large number of the
Iranians themselves do not have an accurate and undistorted knowledge about the
ancient history of Iran, called Persia.
Since
the invasion of Persia by the Muslim Arabs in 651 C.E., many of the states and
the systems which dominated and ruled the Iranians portrayed their ancient
background much in the same way director Zach Snyder did in the movie 300,
and lots of their works on history
treated the pre-Islamic Iranian civilization much the way that Frank Miller�s
novel did.
Iranian
civilization has long been struggling to defend its ancient heritage
simultaneously on two different fronts, one before its classical rival, Western
civilization, and another versus an Arab-Islamic culture or pro-Islam domestic
forces. With a long-standing and proud civilization, the Iranian legacy has so
far succeeded in overcoming so many hostile waves, and its significant
contribution in many aspects to world civilization is indispensable.
Iran
is not simply a polity of a single nation; it is truly a small continent of
many different ethnic groups that are the backbone of a multicultural country
and a community of various people and traditions. After all, 300 does
not just vilify the Iranians, it is an obvious assault to the all societies of
West Asia, Central Asia, North Africa and Eastern Europe, which were once parts
of Iranian wide empires in ancient times. The movie also degrades a large
community of Indian, Chinese, European and American people who come from
Iranian origins and Persian ancestors.
With
a great desire to sell and sensationalize, 300 is a pure fantasy in
which the Persian army is depicted as demons devoid of culture, feeling or
humanity, and in contrast to the noble Greeks, the Iranians are portrayed as
the bloodthirsty people who think of nothing except attacking and killing other
peoples. As an irresponsible and distorted image of ancient Persia, 300
depicts the Persian king, Xerxes and his savage soldiers as decadent, sexually
flamboyant and evil in nature.
As
the Japanese archaeologist, Takashi Okazaki, once pointed out, archaeological
finds from Iran and its former territories indicate an advanced culture in the
pre-Islam Iranian empires left behind. Regrettably,
today many of Iran�s highly valuable relics and historical objects are found in Western museums,
not in Iran. Some of those ancient antiquities
have been directly smuggled to the West upon their discovery.
The
people, who are familiar with art and often visit museums, will not be easily fooled by 300 or Hollywood�s similar baloney, such as the
2004 film Alexander. That is why when the exhibition of �The Glory of
Persia: 7,000 years of culture� was inaugurated in Tokyo�s Metropolitan Museum
last August it was welcomed by an unexpected turnout of the Japanese and
foreign residents. In this exhibition, 210 unique relics belonging to the 5th
millennium B.C.E. to the end of Sassanid empire era in 651 C.E. had been
selected from four Iranian museums. The record number of visitors encouraged
South Korea and China to request hosting the exhibition of �The Glory of Persia� after the two
Japanese cities of Tokyo and Nagoya.
As
usual, a worldwide protest by the Iranians against Hollywood�s assault has so
far backfired, and the Western-based media giants have professionally
manipulated and misused their anger in favor of 300 to increase its
sale. But the Iranians could not tolerate being indifferent about such
incontestable insults, and it is up to the conscience of the international
community to give its judgment. Iranians cannot afford more, because they are
condemned in a world in which the strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what
they must.
Shirzad
Azad is an East-West Asian Relations researcher at the Graduate School of
International Politics, Economics and Communication, Aoyama Gakuin University,
Tokyo, Japan.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor