One crime too many
By Mike Whitney
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Oct 23, 2006, 00:40
Iraq is the great
tragedy of our generation. Every day men and women are brazenly killed in their
own homes or cities by foreign troops who occupy the country without justification.
�liberation� has become a permanent state of martial law where one can never be
certain if his door will suddenly be kicked in and he will either be
shot or dragged off to some remote prison for torture.
Entire cities are
now under siege; surrounded by concertina-wire and massive walls of dirt. The
townspeople are forced to exit and enter through American-run checkpoints and
forced to verify their identity to their foreign jailors.
The country has
become so unsafe that it is impossible for independent journalists to gather
the information the world needs to grasp the horror of what is taking place
under the rubric of �democracy.� Meanwhile, �embedded� journalists continue to
reiterate the same, worn fictions, generated in the Pentagon or right-wing
think tanks, that somehow the Iraqi people are to blame for the massive tragedy
which was created by the invasion.
Riverbend summarizes the mood in Iraq saying, �There are women who have not
shed their black mourning robes since 2003 because each time the end of the
proper mourning period comes around, some other relative dies and the countdown
Iraq is in a
permanent state of bereavement. The suffering we have caused is immeasurable.
President Bush has brushed aside a new survey which shows that over 600,000
Iraqis have been butchered in his �war of choice.� The peer reviewed
epidemiological study appeared in �The Lancet� and has, thus-far, been
supported by every reputable analyst familiar with the methodology used to
determine the number of casualties.
As Dr. Curren Warf,
professor of pediatric medicine and board member of the Physicians for Social
Responsibility, said, �I wish to set the record straight. The Lancet� study is
superb science. The study followed a strict, widely accepted methodology to
arrive at its sobering conclusion. The study is being attacked not on
scientific grounds, but for ideological reasons.�
To Bush, it makes
no difference whether the number is 600,000 or 600 million; the cost in human
terms is irrelevant. In America; the life of one microscopic stem cell is of
more value that the entire population of Iraq. That�s what happens when racism
merges with apathy; the dead simply don�t count.
indifference to the Iraqi death toll to his �pro-life� rhetoric at home.
Consider how he cancelled his Crawford vacation to speed back to Washington to
sign legislation to save the life of Terri Schiavo, even though Schiavo was
showing no mental-activity and 19 courts had already ruled in her husband�s
favor to allow her to die peacefully. Later, an autopsy confirmed that her
brain had calcified and shrunk to half its normal size.
political value was of greater importance to Bush than the 650,000 men, women
and children he has slaughtered in Iraq.
There�s simply no
way to measure this degree of cynicism.
And �what if the
600,000 number is wrong?� Riverbend asks. �What if the minimum number is
correct: nearly 400,000? Is that better? Prior to the war Bush kept claiming
that Saddam killed 300,000 Iraqis over 24 years. After this latest report in
The Lancet, 300,000 is looking quite modest and tame. Congratulations Bush et
Bush�s crimes and
the crimes of the United States are far greater than Saddam�s. Saddam had no
intention of dismantling the government, the army, the civic institutions; of
looting the museums and killing the teachers and intellectuals, of ethnic
cleansing the Christians and the Sunnis, and inciting violence between the
sects. Saddam had no plan to increase malnutrition, to reduce the flow of clean
water, to cut off the electricity, to remove the social-safety net, to increase
the poverty and unemployment, or to set Iraqi against Iraqi in a vicious
struggle for survival. Saddam did not abide by the neoconservative theory of
�creative destruction,� which deliberately plunged an entire nation into chaos
destroying the fabric of Iraqi society and leaving the people to flock to
militias for safety.
Saddam was a
brutal, cold-blooded dictator, but compared to the calculated viciousness of
Bush, he looks like a pillar of virtue.
America will never
atone for its part in the genocide in Iraq. We have compromised our moral
authority for the promise of oil, and lost both in the process. The mission is
unraveling and the vulnerabilities of the empire have been thoroughly exposed.
We will not prevail.
The occupation of
Iraq is �one crime too many.�
(Note: Colin Powell
stated that �genocide� was taking place in Darfur when the figures showed that
approximately 200,000 Sudanese had been killed. Applying Powell�s standard to
Iraq, which has half the population of Sudan, The Lancet statistics prove that
the United States is perpetrating genocide in Iraq. )
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Copyright © 1998-2006 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor